More anti-SDP than anti-WP posts in this present SBF

[Avantas]

I wondered whether you guys notice the discrepancy:

In the old SBF, there are 90% anti-WP posts and 10% anti-SDP posts.

In this new forum, it seems to be another way round.

Many anti-WP forumers such as ptader, MM, has gone MIA, replaced by new nicks who are anti-SDP.

It is obvious that the WP running dogs have forced Sam to leave the old SBF so as to make the new forum a WP forum to promote the fake opposition party.

A vote for WP = A vote for PAP.

Spread the message

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Not really clear. Apart from one rabid anti-SDP chap who I do not recognise from the old SBF I see the same old faces. Perhaps Ptader and MM have their own concerns for now?

 

[myjohnson]

If I were the PAP, I would station one of my dogs in every forum with substantial viewership to spoil every attempt by anyone to present anti PAP views. After all many of these dogs would do it not only for bones but just a pat on the head. Also can anyone be so cocksure that the forum they are in had not clandestinely been bought over by the powers that be already?

 

[Avantas]

You can already see the WP running dogs such as lockeliberal defending the PAP as and when the need arises.

If I were the PAP, I would station one of my dogs in every forum with substantial viewership to spoil every attempt by anyone to present anti PAP views. After all many of these dogs would do it not only for bones but just a pat on the head. Also can anyone be so cocksure that the forum they are in had not clandestinely bought over by the powers that be already?

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Avantas

Ok right seeing as I am a running dog....anything else you want to say abt me, where I stay what I do etc etc since you delight in doing that to others.




Locke

 

[leetahbar]

Dear Avantas

Ok right seeing as I am a running dog....anything else you want to say abt me, where I stay what I do etc etc since you delight in doing that to others.




Locke

smell the roses to stop their childish deja vu sick pranks.

whatever they are up to, it's usually NO GOOD and benefits none. they are just selecting people who dare disagree with them to victimise. same old style. same depiscable and deplorable antics.

 

[myjohnson]

Sorry I don't see him as one because I peruse and digest his views, something worthy of my time unlike some automatons around these parts. Nobody should hold a monopoly of views especially views of the contrived kind. We've had enough of that for the last 50 years.

 

[leetahbar]

i m surprised !! a notorious snake does that...all the time in his posting.

 

[Wisely]

The very first SBF wasn't anti-WP to begin with. If Sam was forced to make this a WP forum, how come he couldn't do it in his earlier forum? Why did he let anti-WP posts grow to 90% without doing anything?

 

[Alu862]

Because under Chee the SDP lost more votes and all its seats than were captured during Chiam's reign. The weak WP however appeared to be power in numbers.

 

[chinkangkor]

Because under Chee the SDP lost more votes and all its seats than were captured during Chiam's reign. The weak WP however appeared to be power in numbers.

Chee and SDP have done most to further the cause of opposition.

 

[Alu862]

Chee and SDP have done most to further the cause of opposition.

Define most. They have lost the most number of seats for a opposition party.

 

[Avantas]

Sam initially advocates a no hold bars approach in the old forum.

The anti-WP forumers grow after GE 2006 when WP's wayang ways infuriates many neutral forumers.

As the chorus of protests against WP grow, WP members such as Melvin Tan, Andrew Loh, Marcus Yap etc begin to send clones into SBF to attack their critics.

The clone wars became so nasty that at one point, Sam asked the WP people to F off to their own forums.

Seeing their tactics have backfired, WP members change their tactics by writing in to SBF host Walt Howes en masse to smear their critics leading to the banning of several of them.

Sam Leong was exasperated that he has no control of this and decided to quit Delphi. At the same time, WP members pressurize Sam to deregister the nicks of the anti-WP forumers in the new forum (I guess these WP DOGS must have known some dark secrets of Sam).

Hence in the new forum, many old SBF WP critics are absent and in their place are filled with new nicks who are pro-WP and anti-SDP.

These filthy WP DOGS are capable of anything. When E Jay wrote to ST to criticize LTK, these WP DOGS kept hoarding and stalking him for 6 months to the extent of writing to NUS to complain about E Jay. These useless cunts are nothing but cyberbulllies. They have no morals, integrity or character.

If these SCUMS can get into Parliament, there is no justice left in this world.

F**K the WP RUNNING DOGS DEAD ! I'd vote for a monkey than for them.

The very first SBF wasn't anti-WP to begin with. If Sam was forced to make this a WP forum, how come he couldn't do it in his earlier forum? Why did he let anti-WP posts grow to 90% without doing anything?

 

[BlueCat]

SDP with Chee is a goner.
WP with Low,at least he is doing some work in parliament,even MM Lee aslo think quite highly of him.

 

[kakowi]

Thanks Avantas for giving us a bit of history here. It is useful for newbies like me.

I have one question though: can the WP and SDP ever work together? Or will they let the background noise make them become lone rangers in search of the same truth?

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Kakowi

As Goebbels once said about propaganda. Repeat it often enough and it becomes the truth. I would like to add that my wish is that the new sammyboy does not have the horrendous attacks of the old though alas as it seems this would not be the case. Please note the following behavior from the old forum as memory serves me and which has thus far after a very quiet start been repeated ad nauseam and ad infinitum here.

1, GMS, Business and Marriage targeted for slime and clone attacks.
2. Melvin Business and Personal life targeted for attack and slime as well.
3. Andrew just personal life but mother brought into picture to attack him.
4. Me just personal, business, poison letters to Sylvia, grin and yes trying to pin certain actions on me at the WP Dinner

In the old forum certain individuals were banned because of crossing swords with another group over the posting of "publicly" available pictures on the SDP website. Some were banned to for discussing the identity of a long departed and missed forumer. As far as I know the only nicks that were banned by WP members that I know were those that were stalking addresses and pasting pictures of their streets and blocks on the flat



Locke

 

[leetahbar]

u missed out one quite recent episode:

exploiting others to do their dirty works during RP dinner

sgpolitic didn't report that. strange.

 

[kakowi]

Dear Locke,

For those who know the truth, they are able to shift it from the propaganda. For the others, they are not able to discern truth from half-truths, mis-truths and un-truths. It became quite bewildering. And for still others, a battle they find irritating. And wonders what will happen to Parliament should they be elected.

In the midst of all these, I wonder if WP and SDP became political parties in order to throw m&d at each other?

Other than self-gratification at the destruction of others, what levels of profit are derived?

Hopefully, some semblance of sense can be imposed by their respective leaders and common grounds be reached and affirmed.

Lone rangers need their Tontos. Zorro needs Catherine Zeta Jones.

Cheers,

 

[chinkangkor]

Define most. They have lost the most number of seats for a opposition party.

That's because as the most vocal opposition party, SDP gets the most number of karate chops, punches and side kicks from PAP.

 

[chinkangkor]

Because under Chee the SDP lost more votes and all its seats than were captured during Chiam's reign. The weak WP however appeared to be power in numbers.

Chee and SDP lost honourably in a lop-sided political contest against them. PAP won those three seats shamelessly.