• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Man has rape charge reduced to outrage of modesty

hurley

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
1,170
Points
0
31-year-old woman agrees to go to budget hotel with man provided that they kiss only.
what kind of stunt is she pulling?


20120119.115435_posed_photo_hands.jpg


An IT analyst who faced a rape charge after forcing himself on a woman he met after two dates had the offence reduced to one of aggravated outrage of modesty instead.

Ng Han Tong, 37, also known as Jimmy Ng, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to three years' jail and six strokes of the cane yesterday.

The Straits Times reported that he and the 31-year-old woman first met online in January 2010 before meeting in person in March.

Ng, who is married, went with the woman to a karaoke pub, and took a walk on a Sentosa beach, where they then kissed.

He tried to touch the woman inappropriately that night, but she resisted.

On their second date the next day, he suggested that they meet, and they ended up in a Chinatown hotel room after visiting a pub. The court was told that she agreed to go to the hotel upon his reassurance that they would only kiss.

However, Ng then tried to remove the woman's clothes, even though she tried to push him away. He also ignored her when she said she did not want to have sex with him.

The court was told that Ng tried to persuade her to perform various sex acts, but she resisted most of his suggestions.

He proceeded to have sex with her anyway, and did not use a condom.

The woman left the hotel in a taxi after that and reported him to the police for rape the next day.

In mitigation, Ng's lawyer R.S Wijaya said that Ng had been stressed and unhappy because he and his wife was unable to conceive at the time of the offence. Ng's wife, also an IT analyst, had forgiven him and expressed that she had no wish to divorce him in a letter to the court, as he was a 'caring and understanding husband'.

Ng's wife described him as a fillial son who was popular among his colleagues and lent his time to charitable causes for the elderly and needy families.

It was unclear why the rape charge was reduced to one of outrage of modesty. The maximum sentence for the latter offence is a jail term of between two and 10 years and caning.
 
False rape claims should be heavily penalized too. The lives of many innocent men have been ruined by some psycho bitch who cried rape.

Jailed for 4 years, for a rape he didn't commit.
http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/03/william-mccaffery-sues-over-4-years-in.html


hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. such "cry-wolf" slut only requires some cold cucumber for her own pleasure.
3. prick or dick is optional mah!
4. she is as guilty as the poor dick.
5. free bonking, can it down on writing.
 
31-year-old woman agrees to go to budget hotel with man provided that they kiss only.
what kind of stunt is she pulling?


20120119.115435_posed_photo_hands.jpg


An IT analyst who faced a rape charge after forcing himself on a woman he met after two dates had the offence reduced to one of aggravated outrage of modesty instead.

Ng Han Tong, 37, also known as Jimmy Ng, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to three years' jail and six strokes of the cane yesterday.

The Straits Times reported that he and the 31-year-old woman first met online in January 2010 before meeting in person in March.

Ng, who is married, went with the woman to a karaoke pub, and took a walk on a Sentosa beach, where they then kissed.

He tried to touch the woman inappropriately that night, but she resisted.

On their second date the next day, he suggested that they meet, and they ended up in a Chinatown hotel room after visiting a pub. The court was told that she agreed to go to the hotel upon his reassurance that they would only kiss.

However, Ng then tried to remove the woman's clothes, even though she tried to push him away. He also ignored her when she said she did not want to have sex with him.

The court was told that Ng tried to persuade her to perform various sex acts, but she resisted most of his suggestions.

He proceeded to have sex with her anyway, and did not use a condom.

The woman left the hotel in a taxi after that and reported him to the police for rape the next day.

In mitigation, Ng's lawyer R.S Wijaya said that Ng had been stressed and unhappy because he and his wife was unable to conceive at the time of the offence. Ng's wife, also an IT analyst, had forgiven him and expressed that she had no wish to divorce him in a letter to the court, as he was a 'caring and understanding husband'.

Ng's wife described him as a fillial son who was popular among his colleagues and lent his time to charitable causes for the elderly and needy families.

It was unclear why the rape charge was reduced to one of outrage of modesty. The maximum sentence for the latter offence is a jail term of between two and 10 years and caning.

The girl must be very dense if she goes to a hotel with a guy and think that he only wanted to kiss. The report also stated that "He proceeded to have sex with her anyway", shows that she was a willing party. KNN crying wolf after giving in. I personally think that the Women's Charter has given too much power to women.
 
Last edited:
Wah, now we know there are girls that has fetish for being a Kiss Buddy! :D
 
Why he pleaded guilty:confused:

Did he use force or threaten her and wrongfully restrained her?

Next time any girlfriend in the bed room can also say outrage of modesty leow:confused:
 
Last edited:
Si Bei Cock. It is obvious the girl is a willing party le. How can the court believe her word against the guy's word when she herself is willing to go to the hotel.

The guy also damn unlucky. There are 1000 such case happening in Singapore every weekend and he is the guy that ganna such shit.
 
Back
Top