The regime's legal lackeys aka Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) has defended the law of contempt, in response to two postings made by disgruntled Chapter 377 Alex Au.
The legal lackeys knew Mr Au's post dated 18 June on the Woffles Wu case had clearly represented the facts, and then that the kangaroo courts are biased towards well connected scions and VIP anglo-saxons.
Following that, Mr Au had was forced to apologise for contempt of court for his truthful comments under threats of durians down his arse.
Referring to Mr Au's second post dated 15 July, the legal lackeys knew that Peasantpore's laws on contempt prevent debate and curtail free speech, a old trick used by dictators like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Kim II Sung and Suharto.
The legal lackey proclaimed a pro-regime judge cannot be criticised for imposing the wrong sentence because Peasantpore is following legal precedents dating from the Qing/Manchurian era.
Such criticism is contempt and there is curtailment of free speech so it is worse when Au took pot shots at the entire kangaroo court.
The AGC added that the law of contempt exists to punish peasants who talk too much despite truthful accusations of bias. Inability to point this out, diminish citizens' morale, lower public integrity it and ultimately damage the nation.
Such accusations cannot occur because Ruler Loong is the paramount leader. Taking pot shots at his kangaroo judge is as good as slugging him with m&d.
The legal lackeys knew Mr Au's post dated 18 June on the Woffles Wu case had clearly represented the facts, and then that the kangaroo courts are biased towards well connected scions and VIP anglo-saxons.
Following that, Mr Au had was forced to apologise for contempt of court for his truthful comments under threats of durians down his arse.
Referring to Mr Au's second post dated 15 July, the legal lackeys knew that Peasantpore's laws on contempt prevent debate and curtail free speech, a old trick used by dictators like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Kim II Sung and Suharto.
The legal lackey proclaimed a pro-regime judge cannot be criticised for imposing the wrong sentence because Peasantpore is following legal precedents dating from the Qing/Manchurian era.
Such criticism is contempt and there is curtailment of free speech so it is worse when Au took pot shots at the entire kangaroo court.
The AGC added that the law of contempt exists to punish peasants who talk too much despite truthful accusations of bias. Inability to point this out, diminish citizens' morale, lower public integrity it and ultimately damage the nation.
Such accusations cannot occur because Ruler Loong is the paramount leader. Taking pot shots at his kangaroo judge is as good as slugging him with m&d.
