American suppliers still support Hwawei and by-past Dotard's BAN! They want to ride on 5G & Chinese Power, told Dotard go fuck spider!
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2019-06-27/doc-ihytcerk9583114.shtml
美政府沮丧地发现：封杀华为后 诡异的一幕终于来了
2019年06月27日 08:16
环球时报
256
“美国企业跨过政府制裁，恢复向中国华为公司供货”，《纽约时报》25日的这一报道得到各方确认。彭博社26日称，美国商务部和白宫官员对这些美国公司恢复向华为出货“感到沮丧”。美国智库彼得森国际经济研究所研究员马丁·乔真帕说，“如果对他们的供应链造成影响，美国公司可以将技术研发转移出美国，因为中国是一个巨大市场”。
“美国企业跨过政府制裁，恢复向中国华为公司供货”，《纽约时报》25日的这一报道得到各方确认。美国最大的电脑存储芯片生产商美光科技25日确认，已经在两周前恢复向华为供货。英国广播公司（BBC）26日称，除了美光，英特尔等美国半导体行业领导者都已经恢复向华为供货。《纽约时报》感叹，“这些交易充分说明，打击华为是多么困难。改变将世界电子行业和全球商业连结在一起的贸易关系网络，可能会带来意想不到的后果。”
据彭博社26日报道，美光科技首席执行官桑杰·梅赫罗特拉在25日的电话会议中表示，该公司经研究后确认，可以向华为出售不受美国商务部禁令约束的一部分产品，已于过去两周开始发货。他说，“我们认为能合法地恢复一些现有产品的出货，因为它们不在出口管理规范的范围，也不在实体清单的限制内。但华为的情况仍存在相当大的不确定性。”这使得美光的股价26日开盘后飙升近15%，并带动其他芯片股的上涨。彭博社的数据显示，华为是美光最大的客户之一，美光大约13%的年收入来自对华为的销售。
《纽约时报》25日称，今年5月，美国商务部将华为列入所谓“实体清单”，阻止华为购买美国企业的零部件。许多企业高管对美国的贸易管制缺乏深入了解，导致他们起初暂停了对华为的供货，直到律师弄清楚哪些产品可以发货。知情人士表示，包括英特尔和美光在内的美国公司“已经找到向华为出售技术的方法”。
彭博社26日引述投资机构分析师卡西迪的话说，美国的出口禁令中有个漏洞，如果芯片中使用的美国技术未达到25%，就可以不受禁令的约束，“美光正是利用了这个漏洞”。另一位分析师福克斯表示，即使一个企业的总部在美国，只要它拥有海外子公司和业务，就能将自己的技术归为“外国技术”。
《纽约时报》25日引述知情人士的话说，特朗普政府对美国企业恢复向华为供货的情况一直有了解，但官员们就如何回应看法不一。一些官员认为，这些销售活动破坏了政府向华为施压的努力，另一些人则持支持态度，因为它可以减轻禁令对美国企业的冲击力。华为曾表示，每年从美国公司采购大约110亿美元的技术。彭博社26日称，美国商务部和白宫官员对这些美国公司恢复向华为出货“感到沮丧”。
美国商务部前官员、律师合伙人沃尔夫对《纽约时报》表示，他为多家为华为供货的美国科技公司提供过咨询。这些企业都急切地想弄清楚，要如何继续向华为供货，一些企业正在考虑将部分产品的生产线及服务全部转移至美国以外。
美国智库彼得森国际经济研究所研究员马丁·乔真帕说，“如果对他们的供应链造成影响，美国公司可以将技术研发转移出美国，因为中国是一个巨大市场”，“一些大赢家可能会是其他国家”。报道称，美国企业并不是华为重要技术的唯一来源，如在华为智能手机的内存芯片方面，美国企业有三星和海力士这样的韩国竞争对手。“如果美光科技无法向华为供货，订单会轻易地转向对手。”
“华为期待德国的爱情！”德国《法兰克福汇报》26日报道，德国经济研究所最近受华为所托，对华为德国公司的效益进行了调查。24日的新闻发布会举办地点与德国国会大厦和总理府只有一步之遥。报告的作者格拉尔德在发布会上说，“华为影响着德国数字生态系统的布局”。
报告显示，2008年至2018年，华为在德国的营业额平均每年增长26%，2018年营业额达到近27亿欧元。而华为在德公司的员工人数每年平均增长13%，目前达到2600人。德国28142个就业岗位与华为有关联。
本报驻美国、德国特约记者 萧 强 青 木
The US government was frustrated to find that after the ban on Huawei, the strange scene finally came.
June 27, 2019 08:16 Global Times
256
“U.S. companies have crossed government sanctions and resumed supply to Chinese Huawei companies.” The New York Times’ 25th report was confirmed by all parties. Bloomberg said on the 26th that the US Department of Commerce and White House officials "feeling" that these US companies are returning to Huawei. Martin Johanpa, a researcher at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in the US think tank, said, "If you influence their supply chain, American companies can transfer technology research and development out of the US because China is a huge market."
“U.S. companies have crossed government sanctions and resumed supply to Chinese Huawei companies.” The New York Times’ 25th report was confirmed by all parties. Micron Technology, the largest computer memory chip maker in the United States, confirmed on the 25th that it has resumed its supply to Huawei two weeks ago. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) said on the 26th that in addition to Micron, Intel and other US semiconductor industry leaders have resumed supply to Huawei. The New York Times lamented, "These transactions fully demonstrate how difficult it is to combat Huawei. Changing the trade network that links the world's electronics industry to global commerce can have unintended consequences."
According to a report by Bloomberg on the 26th, Meiguang Technology CEO Sanjay Mehrotra said in a conference call on the 25th that the company confirmed that it can sell some products that are not subject to the US Department of Commerce ban. Shipments have been shipped in the past two weeks. He said, "We believe that we can legally restore the shipment of some existing products because they are not within the scope of export management regulations and are not within the limits of the entity list. However, there are still considerable uncertainties in Huawei's situation." This caused Micron's share price to rise nearly 15% after the opening on the 26th, and led to the rise of other chip stocks. According to Bloomberg data, Huawei is one of Micron's largest customers, and about 13% of Micron's annual revenue comes from sales to Huawei.
The New York Times said on the 25th that in May this year, the US Department of Commerce listed Huawei as a so-called "physical list" to prevent Huawei from purchasing parts and components of US companies. Many corporate executives lacked a deep understanding of US trade controls, causing them to initially suspend their supply to Huawei until the lawyers figured out which products could be shipped. People familiar with the matter said that US companies, including Intel and Micron, "have found ways to sell technology to Huawei."
Bloomberg quoted investment analyst Cassidy on the 26th as saying that there is a loophole in the US export ban. If the US technology used in the chip does not reach 25%, it can be free from the ban. "Micron is using this. Vulnerabilities." Another analyst, Fox, said that even if a company is headquartered in the United States, as long as it has overseas subsidiaries and businesses, it can classify its technology as "foreign technology."
The New York Times quoted people familiar with the matter on the 25th, saying that the Trump administration has always had an understanding of the return of US companies to Huawei, but officials have different opinions on how to respond. Some officials believe that these sales activities undermine the government's efforts to pressure Huawei, while others are supportive because it can reduce the impact of the ban on US companies. Huawei has said that it purchases about $11 billion in technology from US companies every year. Bloomberg said on the 26th that the US Department of Commerce and White House officials "feeling" that these US companies are returning to Huawei.
Former US Department of Commerce official and lawyer partner Wolfe told the New York Times that he has advised a number of US technology companies supplying Huawei. These companies are eager to figure out how to continue to supply Huawei, and some companies are considering transferring all of their production lines and services outside the United States.
Martin Johanpa, a researcher at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in the US think tank, said, "If you influence their supply chain, American companies can transfer technology research and development out of the US because China is a huge market." "Some big winners may It is another country." According to the report, US companies are not the only source of Huawei's important technologies. For example, in the memory chips of Huawei smartphones, US companies have Korean competitors such as Samsung and Hynix. "If Micron Technology can't supply Huawei, the order will easily turn to the opponent."
"Huawei looks forward to Germany's love!" Germany's "Frankfurt Report" reported on the 26th that the German Economic Research Institute was recently asked by Huawei to investigate the benefits of Huawei's German company. The press conference on the 24th was held just a stone's throw from the Reichstag and the Prime Minister's Office. The author of the report, Glad, said at the press conference that "Huawei affects the layout of the German digital ecosystem."
According to the report, from 2008 to 2018, Huawei's turnover in Germany increased by an average of 26% per year, and its turnover in 2018 reached nearly 2.7 billion euros. The number of Huawei employees in Germany has increased by an average of 13% per year, currently reaching 2,600. 28,142 jobs in Germany are related to Huawei.
The newspaper's special correspondent in the United States and Germany Xiao Qiang Qingmu
