• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Inderjit Singh: Govt FT policy is wrong!

Inderjit has always been forthright and his area of interest is sme and entreneurship. He has been rather vocal issues during this term of parliament. He is self made and does not need the PAP but he has been a PAP man since his university days.

He asked to step down from parliament and not contest the next GE. He has been very influential within the party because he seldom holds back. He is the closest thing to Tan Cheng Bock.
The only time I remember TCB speaking strongly against the party line was regarding the issue on non elected MPs.
I don't remember any other matter of significance. Can you?
 
Let me give you a background of this man. He used to run a clinic in the middle of Ama Keng farm land during the 70s and 80s. He was the village doctor. He was considered next to god by the people there. He treated not only the residents there but those who went into the jungle of Malaysia and fought alongside the communist. He was a committed socialist. He was also active during student union days.

He used to thrash the govt officials when the farmers had no voice. He was persuaded by GCT to become and MP.

Its common knowledge that any major policy change or introduction of new ones were formulated with Tan Cheng Bock in mind. They knew he would stand up. The press always played down his comments and speeches in Parliament.

Not many people are aware that he used to score the highest margins in elections but the PAP failed to convince him to anchor a GRC or use his constituency as an anchor because he believed that every MP might fight his own fight and get the seat correctly.

Its also well known that he does not regard the old man in any light and speaks as though the guy does not exist.

The only time I remember TCB speaking strongly against the party line was regarding the issue on non elected MPs.
I don't remember any other matter of significance. Can you?
 
He only became "vocal" after he "stepped down" as the speaker of parliament.
It's disappointing that even someone like you is not clear about this, although I do appreciate your clarity on other matters.

Speaker is supposed to be 100% neutral. In fact, some countries don't even count the speaker as a government MP once he is elected speaker.
 
16 March 2004
VETERAN backbencher Tan Cheng Bock yesterday asked why it was necessary for Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew to intervene in the Singapore Airlines pilots saga, when younger Government ministers were capable of handling the issue.
MP questions SM's intervention in SIA saga
VETERAN backbencher Tan Cheng Bock yesterday asked why it was necessary for Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew to intervene in the Singapore Airlines pilots saga, when younger Government ministers were capable of handling the issue.

Said the outspoken MP for Ayer Rajah: "Now, many have told me that SM should have let the younger ministers handle the issue by taking a back seat. They asked me: 'Why must SM run to their help so fast? They want to know'."

Handling the pilots' union was a matter that required "people management", "EQ (emotional quotient) as much as IQ (intelligence quotient)" and "political judgement", he said. "Do I believe that the new leaders can handle this issue? Yes. I'm sure they can," he asserted.

"You watch how our new leaders handle Sars, you watch how they handle the Asian financial crisis and you watch how they are managing our economic downturn," he said, noting that they had the confidence and ability.

And, for emphasis, he added: "When Singaporeans are afraid that our younger leaders cannot manage without Mr Lee Kuan Yew and are losing their sleep, I tell them: 'Don't worry. Our younger leaders can do it'." VETERAN backbencher Tan Cheng Bock yesterday asked why it was necessary for Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew to intervene in the Singapore Airlines pilots saga, when younger Government ministers were capable of handling the issue.

Said the outspoken MP for Ayer Rajah: "Now, many have told me that SM should have let the younger ministers handle the issue by taking a back seat. They asked me: 'Why must SM run to their help so fast? They want to know'."

Handling the pilots' union was a matter that required "people management", "EQ (emotional quotient) as much as IQ (intelligence quotient)" and "political judgement", he said. "Do I believe that the new leaders can handle this issue? Yes. I'm sure they can," he asserted.

"You watch how our new leaders handle Sars, you watch how they handle the Asian financial crisis and you watch how they are managing our economic downturn," he said, noting that they had the confidence and ability.

And, for emphasis, he added: "When Singaporeans are afraid that our younger leaders cannot manage without Mr Lee Kuan Yew and are losing their sleep, I tell them: 'Don't worry. Our younger leaders can do it'." VETERAN backbencher Tan Cheng Bock yesterday asked why it was necessary for Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew to intervene in the Singapore Airlines pilots saga, when younger Government ministers were capable of handling the issue.

Said the outspoken MP for Ayer Rajah: "Now, many have told me that SM should have let the younger ministers handle the issue by taking a back seat. They asked me: 'Why must SM run to their help so fast? They want to know'."

Handling the pilots' union was a matter that required "people management", "EQ (emotional quotient) as much as IQ (intelligence quotient)" and "political judgement", he said. "Do I believe that the new leaders can handle this issue? Yes. I'm sure they can," he asserted.

"You watch how our new leaders handle Sars, you watch how they handle the Asian financial crisis and you watch how they are managing our economic downturn," he said, noting that they had the confidence and ability.

And, for emphasis, he added: "When Singaporeans are afraid that our younger leaders cannot manage without Mr Lee Kuan Yew and are losing their sleep, I tell them: 'Don't worry. Our younger leaders can do it'."





The only time I remember TCB speaking strongly against the party line was regarding the issue on non elected MPs.
I don't remember any other matter of significance. Can you?
 
Solid rebuttal man! You are always armed to yr teeth!

16 March 2004
VETERAN backbencher Tan Cheng Bock yesterday asked why it was necessary for Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew to intervene in the Singapore Airlines pilots saga, when younger Government ministers were capable of handling the issue.
MP questions SM's intervention in SIA saga
 
Let me give you a background of this man. He used to run a clinic in the middle of Ama Keng farm land during the 70s and 80s. He was the village doctor. He was considered next to god by the people there. He treated not only the residents there but those who went into the jungle of Malaysia and fought alongside the communist. He was a committed socialist. He was also active during student union days.

He used to thrash the govt officials when the farmers had no voice. He was persuaded by GCT to become and MP.

Its common knowledge that any major policy change or introduction of new ones were formulated with Tan Cheng Bock in mind. They knew he would stand up. The press always played down his comments and speeches in Parliament.

Not many people are aware that he used to score the highest margins in elections but the PAP failed to convince him to anchor a GRC or use his constituency as an anchor because he believed that every MP might fight his own fight and get the seat correctly.

Its also well known that he does not regard the old man in any light and speaks as though the guy does not exist.
Thanks for the additional background information, Scroobal.
But you have not answered my question. :)
Sorry, I just saw your latest post. Has he raised any strong points which benefit the ordinary person and is against the ruling party and the ministers. This SIA case merely shows that he does not put oldman on a pedestal.
 
Last edited:
I can assure you that Cheng Bock was an exception. There are just too many and they are not in the public place and it covered small business to the ordinary man. Not many people are aware that he led the first revolt of the Singapore Medical Council in the 1970s.

It was him that gave courage to Tan Soo Khoon and Wan Soon Bee and they became the feared 3 much more than the opposition in Parliament.

Even CPF Board could not believe the govt agreed to allowing CPF funds for education.


Thanks for the additional background information, Scroobal.
But you have not answered my question. :)
Sorry, I just saw your latest post. Has he raised any strong points which benefit the ordinary person and is against the ruling party and the ministers. This SIA case merely shows that he does not put oldman on a pedestal.
 
Talk about high scoring, Tan Lead Shake lost his deposit versus Tan Cheng Bock.
 
I can assure you that Cheng Bock was an exception. There are just too many and they are not in the public place and it covered small business to the ordinary man. Not many people are aware that he led the first revolt of the Singapore Medical Council in the 1970s.

It was him that gave courage to Tan Soo Khoon and Wan Soon Bee and they became the feared 3 much more than the opposition in Parliament.

Even CPF Board could not believe the govt agreed to allowing CPF funds for education.

You are dreaming of a bygone era. These days we have LSS instead.
If scandal of Jack Neo did not break, we would probably have seen him as a canidate.
 
Back
Top