• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Home Team officer forced to resign over fatality at training exercise

Extremist

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
2,799
Points
0
People always envy folks in government service and the public sector because we seemingly have “iron-rice bowl” jobs and are well-taken care of by the government.

Well, I’ve learnt the very hard way this isn’t true: we are as susceptible, if not more prone, to being let go if anything were to go wrong on the job.

Believe me, if you were doing things that were highly visible to so many, and given how the government seems to adopt a “cover backside” approach to dealing with ever-rising public complaints, it’s easy to become a target and become the next to start packing your desk at work.

I am a 38 year old PMET with vast experiences in both the public and private sectors, and I hold an MBA and a bachelor’s degree from the National University of Singapore.

While I didn’t go to the top schools, I guess you could say I was among the top 20-30% of my batch in terms of academics, having gone through the full PSLE-O Level-A Level route to university.

I joined a government organization in 2010 as senior officer in a mid-career switch, and I was in the limelight for a while because everyone who knew me was of the opinion I could rise through the ranks quickly based on my experiences and maturity: for a while too, it did seem that way, as I was asked to head projects very quickly– prominent projects– that would ‘add visibility’ to my track record, in the words of my senior directors.

Then disaster struck as a training exercise went wrong, and we had a fatality.

The trainee who died was a promising young officer, and the family raised hell over the issues of training safety and such, and complained all the way up to the powers that may be at the Ministry.

Now to be very honest, I wasn’t directly involved in the whole incident: I was not even an overseeing officer, but I was in charge of that branch, and therefore was held accountable.

The officers who were responsible were similarly taken to task, but ultimately, as the head, it was my ass on the line.

I was then subjected to months of inquiries and investigations, and a polygraph examination, and eventually, after 24 months of putting me through all that, my boss called me up to the office one day and suggested I resign voluntarily so it made it easier to close the loop.

Else, there would be more investigations and inquiries, polygraph examinations, and a date with the courts to determine the outcome, and there is a possibility I could find myself in prison for “negligence”.

I was thus a victim of a disciplinary charge that arose administratively, not because of actions on my part. I was made a scapegoat in the hope that the family would somehow be appeased knowing some sort of action was taken, and I guess what the higher-ups were aiming for was some out-of-court settlement and the case closed.

I have no idea if the other officers directly responsible were asked to leave as well, or if they were even allowed to leave lest they needed someone to go face the full legal consequences.So where does that put me?

It didn’t matter that I was a high-performer at work, that when it came to rankings, I was one of the top dogs, or that I diligently discharged my duties because I took my job seriously– what mattered was that someone’s head had to roll, and who better than the head of the department first?

Like so many of you, I too, have a family to feed, I too, have my own set of challenges to manage– all these didn’t matter.

I suppose all is not lost, because I could try finding a job back in the private sector, but hearing all these stories about how local PMETs are facing resistance in securing employment, I’m beginning to wonder if I should continue living here.

Screw the “we want to prevent a brain drain” nonsense from the government, I say it does make you wonder if the government is truly sincere about taking care of the needs of born-and-bred Singaporeans.
 
Now to be very honest, I wasn’t directly involved in the whole incident: I was not even an overseeing officer, but I was in charge of that branch, and therefore was held accountable.


Reminds me of Wong Kan Seng and Mas Selamat!
 
Can someone ask him who did he voted for during his civil service years?
 
It's just like a parade commander who fucks up during NDP.

Kiss goodbye to promotion and say hello to hentak kaki.
 
Now start singing, "Like a Rolling Stone" by Bob Dylan.

What about "Blowing In The Wind"? Or "Knocking On Heaven's Door"? Or "Mr Tambourine Man"?

All very nice songs too.
 
He was the scapegoat because he did not cultivate his political connections but honed his technical expertise instead.

That's not talent. The real PAP talents were the scholars who did nothing, achieved little, kissed many asses, built in escape routes and taichi into their daily effort. But they get paid millions.

You will never find them blamed for anything.
 
Those who did little claimed the credit.
Those who did the most ended up a "debit".
 
nothing new from gahmen agencies, i had a friend who had been working in a stats board for nearly 16 years. he can get promoted and demoted in the following year. no reason given, just that he dun know how to kiss ass and his boss gave him a bad report.

the officer should bring up his case to the pap politicians, after reading thru the passage, it seems to me how come the safety officer not charged but he who is the branch head? if his account is true, then something may be amiss?
 
Firstly, he wasnt made the scapegoat, he resigned coz he had no balls to face the music (if any), thinking that resigning is gong to absolve himself of any responsibilities. If he was wrong, even he resign, also will be charged.

Secondly, he talks as if he indeed was not responsible. Being the head of the branch, all wrong doings has his ass on the line. Conversely, any merits earned, he will be credited for it, even though he wasnt even the overseeing officer. He was too lazy to walk around, get a feel of the ground on what was being carried out and how far actual practices deviated from the manual. Simply put, he got lazy... In the real world, and anywhere not in the SAF, responsibilities come with appointments, not whether you were on the ground when things happened.

Lastly, it is other people's son we are talking about, would he spoke so nonchalantly if it was his son who died? The above article pretty much sums up the quality of officers and people in commanding positions we have in the SAF. If you have a kid going in to SAF, his death will be seen as an obstacle to someone else's promotion prospects from the way this so-called "high flyer" thinks... Good luck!
 
Last edited:
Agree with all the points that you made. He does have a responsibility and if he carried it well, he would not have resigned. He would have fought it all the way.

Firstly, he wasnt made the scapegoat, he resigned coz he had no balls to face the music (if any), thinking that resigning is gong to absolve himself of any responsibilities. If he was wrong, even he resign, also will be charged.
!
 
The real PAP talents were the scholars who did nothing, achieved little, kissed many asses, built in escape routes and taichi into their daily effort. But they get paid millions.

You will never find them blamed for anything.

Agreed. Even the CEO of NEA got away scot-free during the current haze crisis. She even managed to get a Ministar (Ms Vivien, I think) to defend her at a carefully choreographed TV talk show.
 
Agreed. Even the CEO of NEA got away scot-free during the current haze crisis. She even managed to get a Ministar (Ms Vivien, I think) to defend her at a carefully choreographed TV talk show.

Not NEA, you mean MDA surely...?
 
Guess this chap not an elite n member of the familee. So got thrown to the wolves.
 
Guess this chap not an elite n member of the familee. So got thrown to the wolves.

Probably you are right, he is not elite and not THAT high-flyer.. but his over-inflated ego thinks he should be absolved of all shit, to the extent that a death of a trainee (someone else's son) shouldnt be a hindrance in his career. Curious what his occupation is now.
 
Back
Top