Yu mean its not profitable? Didn't you guys claim they made a killing on the contract? Ahahahaha..............
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Ho Ho Ho-sey ah - Ho Pin AIM replies. Happy now?
- Thread starter Confuseous
- Start date
Yu mean its not profitable? Didn't you guys claim they made a killing on the contract? Ahahahaha..............
all the money go into that ah neh pocket, leaving only $2 for the people.
Those potential bidders did not bid quoting exactly some of the reasons above.
That was exactly the point of my earlier post - how to make a tender apparently open when in fact it was not. I was talking generally but some points mentioned there could also apply here.
From the statement, seems more than one sumitte the bid, but withdrew, leaving only the S$2 company. Look at the sentences below the one mentioning NCS....
As one forummer stated, tender specs can be designed to spec out competitors, quite common in the market.
The question is why can give to a S$2 dollar company one har
As one forummer stated, tender specs can be designed to spec out competitors, quite common in the market.
The question is why can give to a S$2 dollar company one har
only 1 company apply. too many rules to follow. instruction purpsoely not clear.
What are the rules that cannot be followed or not clear? please be specific.
precisely. how to be specific when the tender itself is not specific.
in what ways was the tender not specific? please enlighten us.
in what way is the tender so enlightening, please be specific.
One of the companies which picked up the tender forms but did not submit was Hutcabb Consulting, and IT company which lists the AG's Chambers and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as its clients. Its CEO Mr Olivier Tian told the NewPaper on Friday that his company did not bid for the software project because the TCs did not provide sufficient information about it in the tender documents.
"It was very hard to make a decision based on what was provided. After paying more than$200-00, we simply got a thin stack of documents and the TCs were unable to provide us with more information" he said.
NEC Asia and NCS declined to comment on why they did not make a bid, while CSC Techologies Services could not be reached.
"It was very hard to make a decision based on what was provided. After paying more than$200-00, we simply got a thin stack of documents and the TCs were unable to provide us with more information" he said.
NEC Asia and NCS declined to comment on why they did not make a bid, while CSC Techologies Services could not be reached.
Thats means you have no proofs to back up your claim la. ahahahahahaha..................
What proof have you got? Is your Prime Minister whose dick you are sucking so hard an honorable man? Answer why if you think it is so you son of a prostitute!....hahahaahahaah
proofs to back up their claims.
I have stated so clearly in my post. If you cannot comprehend it, I cannot help you.
You made baseless statements and showed no specifics. How to agree or believe you bro?
Hai ya, why you care what they said about me? Don't you know they are jealous?
As long as I come home in time every night, you can reassure yourself again and again.
This time I let you bite as hard as you want to be sure they are still there but one small request..remove your denture please.
Similar threads
