• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Guess why??? Why did AGC drop corruption charges against Iswaran despite PCA’s section 8’s presumption clause?

searcher1

Alfrescian
Loyal
IF Singaporean really want Justice, stop giving them mandate
The Opposition cannot check the system without being the Govt.
Dont forget with the Elected President in place, he will almost block everything
The purpose is to show the Public, see how useless they are, nothing can be done
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
y dey now oni drop n change charges? ...

dey dunno ze law meh? ... dey telling me dey dun even noe wat dey r doing? ...
 

3_M

Alfrescian
Loyal
I don't understand. Once upon a time, there was a powerful old man bought a few condos in prime district together with his son. The developer gave them a hefty discount and they gladly accepted the offer. How come they were not charged under section 165?
 

sbfuncle

Alfrescian
Loyal
The prosecution's justification to amend the corruption charges under s.6(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act to s.165 of Penal Code is flawed.

The "litigation risk" was in reference to corruption charges. In other words, there was no litigation risk with respect to the 32 lesser charges of accepting gifts and 1 charges for obstruction of justice. That is to say, irrespective of the corruption charges, the Prosecution would still have secured a conviction for the lesser charges. That is also to say, if the Prosecution had proceeded with both corruption and accepting gifts charges, regardless of the litigation risk with respect to the corruption charges, the Prosecution would still have secured a conviction for the lesser charges WITHOUT THE NECESSITY of accepting a guilty plea for the lesser charges.

On the other hand, if there was a risk that they might not secure a conviction for the lesser charges and that the Prosecution might not get anything, then it would be worthwhile to consider giving up the corruption charges for a sure conviction under the lesser charges via a guilty plea. So, if anything, the Prosecution should have concerned itself with whether there was a litigation risk with respect to the lesser charges, and not the corruption charges.

骗人的!
KNN the law is so complicated.
Seems like is su kah yee gong.
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
KNN the law is so complicated.
Seems like is su kah yee gong.
Imagine I owe you 1 punch on the face and 1 slap on the wrist. Your lawyer tells you it's difficult to prove the punch on the face, in other words, a litigation risk. Your lawyer says nothing about the slap on the wrist, meaning you will surely get to slap my wrist even if I don't plead guilty.

On the day of trial, your lawyer tells you: "Uncle, we may not be able to prove the punch on the face. So I advise you we drop the punch on the face completely but in return we get him to plead guilty on the slap on the wrist."

Then you tell your lawyer: "Hey! I thought I was going to slap his wrist anyway, plead guilty or not. So what in return do I get for forgoing the punch on the face?"

Your lawyer says: "Actually nothing."

Then you tell your lawyer: "Then if we take him to task for both claims, the worst case scenario is I still get to slap his wrist, right?"

Your lawyer says: "KNN uncle, you broke my secret code."
 

birdie69

Alfrescian
Loyal
IF Singaporean really want Justice, stop giving them mandate
The Opposition cannot check the system without being the Govt.
Dont forget with the Elected President in place, he will almost block everything
The purpose is to show the Public, see how useless they are, nothing can be done
I thought the elected president promised dragon and phoenix during campaign.
 

Hightech88

Alfrescian
Loyal
IF Singaporean really want Justice, stop giving them mandate
The Opposition cannot check the system without being the Govt.
Dont forget with the Elected President in place, he will almost block everything
The purpose is to show the Public, see how useless they are, nothing can be done

Problem is, PAP has cleverly designed a system whereby opposition will always self-pwn and good candidates will only join PAP which will continue to perpetuate PAP's power to arse-fark Sinkies for at least the next 1000 years til a farking Tsunami or asteroid wipe us out, LOL.
 

KingFook Sr

Alfrescian
Loyal

Guess why??? Why did AGC drop corruption charges against Iswaran despite PCA’s section 8’s presumption clause?
- So simple​

.
This is how corruption can be mitigated when their own PAP are caught with corruption.
 

searcher1

Alfrescian
Loyal
I don't understand. Once upon a time, there was a powerful old man bought a few condos in prime district together with his son. The developer gave them a hefty discount and they gladly accepted the offer. How come they were not charged under section 165?

No mortals dare to challenge the Gods that time.
This time is just a Iswaran, he is not deity-level in their eyes
Look out closely on the Son of Woody Goh, he is a Demigod
 

searcher1

Alfrescian
Loyal
I thought the elected president promised dragon and phoenix during campaign.

He played the "Ong-Lye" popular card & presented himself seemly no harm innocent image
They want safe PAP-gene President to block Opposition IF they happen to win a freak election.
Now he is moonlighting ... got free time as he is only needed his presence only on 9th August
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
So is correction not corruption huh. I knew it, pap is all a long clean and onest like ah gong said! :cool:
 

Patriotmissile

Alfrescian
Loyal
Daft Sinkies still believe the kangaroo courts of a totalitarian regime will actually dispense justice. :roflmao:

A little trip down memory lane...

Litigation-Financing-2-1.jpg
Is this cock gay still in charge of certis sicko?
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I don't understand. Once upon a time, there was a powerful old man bought a few condos in prime district together with his son. The developer gave them a hefty discount and they gladly accepted the offer. How come they were not charged under section 165?

dotter oso ...

dat dotter bot 2 4 herself summor ...
 

bigozt

Alfrescian
Loyal
Corruption is the norm. From the political action lobbyists at the steps of Congress; in the darkened offices of China Communist Party provincial chiefs; in the halls of Kremlin and alcoves of Westminister, deal$ are being made. Call it political donations or whatever, but black is black, shit is shit. Likewise high level gifting is the norm in the F1 world from Monaco to Las Vegas. SG does not want to be a laughing stock of the world to carry the anti corruption mantle when greater powers don’t give a fuck.
 

nabeifuckpap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Problem is, PAP has cleverly designed a system whereby opposition will always self-pwn and good candidates will only join PAP which will continue to perpetuate PAP's power to arse-fark Sinkies for at least the next 1000 years til a farking Tsunami or asteroid wipe us out, LOL.
More like woke candidates join PAP and WP

SDP and PSP better get into Parliament and do a forensic audit of all PAP shit, at least they don't hire woke cheebyes who suck Democrats and CCP cock
IMG_20240901_072615.jpg
 

Lizzert

Alfrescian
Loyal
Dumb sinkies should ask
"If there was really such a litigation risk, why didn't Iswaran insist on court proceedings since
he has the BESTSEST lawyer in Singapore..who has never lost a case when representing any of the men in white ?"
 
Top