• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

EDB's "Queen Bee" Just Got Stung By Chinese Hornets

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
1,489
Points
0
This is what will happen when we start boasting prematurely.

http://www.todayonline.com/Singapor...g-over-solar-manufacturing-plant-in-Singapore

Clouds looming over solar manufacturing plant in Singapore?
by Neo Chai Chin [email protected]
07:42 AM May 25, 2010

SINGAPORE - Will the Renewable Energy Corporation's (REC) $2.6 billion solar manufacturing plant in Singapore - the world's largest, which is nearing completion - stand up to competition from Chinese manufacturers?

An analyst from investment research firm Morningstar raised the question on May 11 when he labelled REC's stock overvalued.

"Essentially, REC's Singapore plant (currently in ramp-up) is the company's last chance to solve the woes of its wafer and panel segments, both of which have destroyed incredible amounts of shareholder value during the last two years," wrote Mr Stephen Simko, a stock analyst covering the technology sector.

The Norway-based REC's stock has fallen about 70 per cent in value over the past year.

"If Singapore fails to bridge the wide divide between the wafer and panel production costs of REC and Chinese solar companies such as Trina, Yingli and LDK Solar, these segments - 70 per cent of total sales - will be proven to essentially have no value. In our opinion, this is how events are likely to play out," he added.

When REC chose Singapore to build a new plant in 2007, it was a boost to Singapore's clean energy hub ambitions and the Economic Development Board's (EDB) then-managing director Ko Kheng Hwa said it would be a "queen bee" attracting a hive of solar activities to Singapore.

Last year, the EDB also set aside $680 million to develop the clean technology sector over the next six years.

So how widely shared are Morningstar's sentiments, and is it cause for Singapore to worry?

While some industry experts noted that Morningstar's analysis was valid, others felt there was a need to look at the bigger picture of the solar energy industry.

"I believe to some extent the analyst's assessment is true," said Mr Ravi Krishnaswamy, Asia-Pacific director of energy and power systems at Frost and Sullivan.

But with REC's aim to keep manufacturing costs below 1 ($1.76) per watt, if achieved, would give it a "slight edge" over the Chinese, whose costs are about US$2 ($2.81) per watt, he said.

The way for manufacturers to stay ahead of the competition is to deliver all-round value to customers, said Dr Michael Quah of the National University of Singapore's Energy Studies Institute (ESI).

"As to pricing, just remember that panels are but one component in the supply and value chain; what the consumer sees, and what the public and government projects buy, are complete systems, not simply panel prices," said Dr Quah, ESI's principal fellow and chief scientist.

On REC's declining stock prices, he had this to say: "If there is a lesson from the current stock market gyrations globally, it is that stock prices reflect public sentiment more than ground reality."

When contacted, REC vice-president and Investor Relations officer Mikkel Torud said production costs for wafer, cell and module production are expected to come down with the Tuas South plant, compared to its European manufacturing facilities.

REC's Singapore plant has begun test production, and announced last month its plans to run at nearly full capacity in the fourth quarter of this year to meet demand in Asia. Its planned capacity is 740mw of wafers, 550mv of solar cells and 590mv of modules.
 
WIll kena slaughtered by the Chinese. Part of their stimulus package had a huge renewable energy portion. As such Beijing is building giant solar power generation capability.

So Chinese mfg can supply to these projects which will in return reduce their unit cost.
 
We just have to be always in front at cutting edge .

Not some low yield manufacturing plant .
 
If SG can commercialize multi-junction photovoltaics with an efficiency of 45+% and maintain a market lead for at least 2 years, I will tok myself into a eunuch and worship PAP. :D:D:D

But the most likely scenario would be GLC/Foreign joint venture that will employ dirt cheap chinamen and become a CSM within 5 years.

WIll kena slaughtered by the Chinese. Part of their stimulus package had a huge renewable energy portion. As such Beijing is building giant solar power generation capability.

So Chinese mfg can supply to these projects which will in return reduce their unit cost.
 
Good point. It's going to degenerate into another CSM. Mfg to HC is like shit to flies! It's going to be abt cut-throat mfg and/or supply chain costs competition and nobody can drive down costs better than the Chinese! One big honey pot for the losers. We always get sucked into losing deals and never learn. We know fuckall abt R&D much less hold any IP rights, so whilst Sinkies clutch at straws to survive, the early movers will be laughing all the way to the bank and we end up another Suzhou!

If SG can commercialize multi-junction photovoltaics with an efficiency of 45+% and maintain a market lead for at least 2 years, I will tok myself into a eunuch and worship PAP. :D:D:D

But the most likely scenario would be GLC/Foreign joint venture that will employ dirt cheap chinamen and become a CSM within 5 years.
 
Back
Top