• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Dr Chee, a real threat to PAP... Democratically Speaking

yellowarse

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
the PAP is very cunning. they are playing up the sentiment that dr chee is here to divide the opposition.

Agree, they want SDP to be a counterbalance to WP to split the opposition vote in 2016, knowing that WP is on the rise, having won a GRC.

At the very worst, he'd just be a toothless threat, his reputation among the conservative masses having been torn to shreds by the MSM, the CST ouster, and his various run-ins with the law through the years.

Either way, PAP gains.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
I'll take your bet then. Where's the proof that he's a fake opposition, just like those jokers in WP? :confused:

ze bet is on, your move uncle GD .............................................

but after euro 2012, cruxx will need to prove also that he has a liver and at least one kidney left..................... :biggrin:
 

Reddog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wanted to buy another of his book but found that it was sold out. Where can I buy more for my overseas friends ?
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Bro, for such matters it shouldn't be guess work. Not fair for the person involved.

Let's just say I am prepared to bet my liver and kidney on being right.

Jokes aside, the way you have left this, it's already not fair for the person involved.

If he's not a mole, you have disparaged what he has supposedly tried to do for the better part of his life.
i don't think we can assume he's a mole simply because he didn't succeed in moving the opposition forward, in taking any parliamentary seats, and at times even made the opposition look bad. All human beings have flaws, it could be because he was too ambitious early on, too angry for his supposed injustice, too silly to see the bigger picture, etc. The pappies are ruthless where it comes to dealing with people who oppose them or disagree with them or with those they perceive as trying to put them down. Surely I don't have to repost "that quote" again.
 

tanwahp

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Agree, they want SDP to be a counterbalance to WP to split the opposition vote in 2016, knowing that WP is on the rise, having won a GRC.

The only way that can happen is if SDP intentionally goes to Hougang, Aljunied or other wards contested by WP. If not, how can this method work?

WP has announced where it would contest and the only place they are stepping into is Tampines, but that issue is with NSP not SDP. It is a very big hint for opposition parties as to where they can work on. For SDP, it means Sembawang and Holland-BT will be free and untouched.

Of course, the third party may not only be in the form of WP. NSP or RP may want to claim Sembawang or HBT grounds.
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
Agree, they want SDP to be a counterbalance to WP to split the opposition vote in 2016, knowing that WP is on the rise, having won a GRC.

At the very worst, he'd just be a toothless threat, his reputation among the conservative masses having been torn to shreds by the MSM, the CST ouster, and his various run-ins with the law through the years.

Either way, PAP gains.

Ya man, since GE2011 the WP really had the ruling party on the ropes.

One can only wish Chee will not undo WP's good work so far. :mad:
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
Chee and JB were too personal. If Chee focuses on the people's issues and not personalities, he may be able to connect with voters more. A lot of what Old Man did to JBJ and CSJ had to do with personal revenge due to their perceived personal attacks.
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Chee and JB were too personal. If Chee focuses on the people's issues and not personalities, he may be able to connect with voters more. A lot of what Old Man did to JBJ and CSJ had to do with personal revenge due to their perceived personal attacks.
Political success comes from disassociation with personal vendetta. Political collapse comes from over indulgence in personal revenge.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
i don't think we can assume he's a mole simply because he didn't succeed in moving the opposition forward, in taking any parliamentary seats, and at times even made the opposition look bad. All human beings have flaws, it could be because he was too ambitious early on, too angry for his supposed injustice, too silly to see the bigger picture, etc. The pappies are ruthless where it comes to dealing with people who oppose them or disagree with them or with those they perceive as trying to put them down. Surely I don't have to repost "that quote" again.

Believe me bro. Nothing to do with what you stated above.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Though the 30K secret offer certainly raises issues over agenda, I am sure it is not to divide the opposition nor to act as a counterbalance but to smear the entire opposition with the same brush. The collateral damage across the opposition would be the end result.

Chee by nature is very myopic and at the same time very resolute on certain things such a human rights, Myanmar etc. He is also bound to be bring in or associate with foreign detractors and champagne socialists and NGOs. Though these things tend to appeal to the certain niches, it bound to put off the majority of heartlanders. I am sure the PAP is wanting for the fallout to impact all opposition and make the PAP look real sweet.

Here is a case in point - Ravi damaged the VW's 2011 campaign to some extent. Though it did harm Viv to some extent, the greater damage was on VW.

And we all can guarantee with 100% certainty that the MSM will focus mainly on Chee and the SDP for all the wrong reasons and drown out the rest. The impression that they are looking to create is the Chee is the only alternative to the PAP.

2016 will be interesting.



Agree, they want SDP to be a counterbalance to WP to split the opposition vote in 2016, knowing that WP is on the rise, having won a GRC.

At the very worst, he'd just be a toothless threat, his reputation among the conservative masses having been torn to shreds by the MSM, the CST ouster, and his various run-ins with the law through the years.

Either way, PAP gains.
 

Conqueror

Alfrescian
Loyal
So CSJ is a threat to PAP. If he is a threat why give him a $470,000 discount to stand for election? If he is a threat, he would have raised the full sum himself If he has the support to be a threat? Or is he now considered the new pseudo-opposition?


Why worry at this juncture ? Take a step at a time. When the time is ripe, everyone has the chance to reap profits and skim the cream. PAP has to pretend to be lax. They are buying time to fill the island with more pro-PAP craps. 5 years is long enough to gain their foothold.

When pro-oppo Sinkies become the minority, why bother with an SDP leader who is not the aung san suu kyi of Sinkiesland. :cool:
 

Cruxx

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ya man, since GE2011 the WP really had the ruling party on the ropes.

One can only wish Chee will not undo WP's good work so far. :mad:

Spot on!

[video=youtube;AdfP2wmtuNk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdfP2wmtuNk[/video]
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
With CSJ in government, I worry it would. For some 20 years, he has said nothing about how to run government, not even constituency.

Just look at what the PAP has done to Spore, millions of foreigners in Spore displacing Sporeans, incompetent people in the gov't, untold loses by LKY/Ho Ching/LHL, corruption in the gov't, etc .....

I doubt CSJ has enough people to form a new gov't but I sure want people like him in the gov't to keep a watchful eye on the PAP & to raise questions on behalf of "lesser mortals". The more opposition members we have in parliament the better because we can all see that even LKY can abuse his position :rolleyes:
 

Cruxx

Alfrescian
Loyal
Just look at what the PAP has done to Spore, millions of foreigners in Spore displacing Sporeans, incompetent people in the gov't, untold loses by LKY/Ho Ching/LHL, corruption in the gov't, etc .....

I doubt CSJ has enough people to form a new gov't but I sure want people like him in the gov't to keep a watchful eye on the PAP & to raise questions on behalf of "lesser mortals". The more opposition members we have in parliament the better because we can all see that even LKY can abuse his position :rolleyes:

Learn from the enlightened Europeans. Coalition governments are the way to go. :biggrin:
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Learn from the enlightened Europeans. Coalition governments are the way to go. :biggrin:

Yes, one thing I learned from my stay in Canada, is that the Canadians understand the dangers of giving too much power to a party. They have provincial & federal elections & most Canadians are savy enough to make sure to vote for different parties in these 2 elections and thereby have a balance of 2 opposing parties. They also have term limits for PMs. A PM can only hold office for only 2 terms. A LKY would never be allowed to be created in the Canadian system.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Bro, quite a naive comment. You expect GD to publish his reasons and provide proof as well as an affidavit. GD carries a level of credibility based on his professional background and track record in here. Notice he never give advice on surgery of the eye and did you wonder why.

He is referring to a pattern of behaviour over a period of time that does not reconcile with a politician with his level of education and backgound. Proof via admission, payments and fund transfer records, photos of clandestine meetings etc are stuff of spy books and movies.

As not being fair to the individual is quite a stretch. These things will not arise if the conduct is inline with expected behaviour. Take KJ for example. Despite being hopelessly unelectable no one will consider KJ's motives even though he wrecked the opportunity for his party to capture seats. The same cannot be said of James Gomez from the moment he began writing books and got into the roundtable. You knew that this guy was trouble and he did so spectacularly in front of a camera. Then you have NSP, Seow and even Juffrie.

People are bound to form opinions and views and you cannot stop them.






Jokes aside, the way you have left this, it's already not fair for the person involved.

If he's not a mole, you have disparaged what he has supposedly tried to do for the better part of his life.
i don't think we can assume he's a mole simply because he didn't succeed in moving the opposition forward, in taking any parliamentary seats, and at times even made the opposition look bad. All human beings have flaws, it could be because he was too ambitious early on, too angry for his supposed injustice, too silly to see the bigger picture, etc. The pappies are ruthless where it comes to dealing with people who oppose them or disagree with them or with those they perceive as trying to put them down. Surely I don't have to repost "that quote" again.
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
6437191920111028000510046.jpg
 
Top