-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Compensation for AMDK is always much more than to Sinkies
- Thread starter A Singaporean
- Start date
These are the talents we want right?Ang mohs didn't come all the way to Sinkieland to get paid Sinkie wages. Even their condo rental alone eats up a chunk of their monthly salary.
Commoners shd crowd funding to sue the angmoh back knowing cycling on taxpayers road is a induced risk cycling on public road.
Commoners can sue him for economic lost hours stopping, stalling and blocking car users whose livelihood depend on no accident road usage.
Crowdfund to sue this white trash to show that he is a menace to road users stalling the country economic loss from this risk taker cyclist... claim economic loss worth billions of dollars for the car road users.
Chao angmoh knows only to claim his economic loss than how about the country economic loss of his menace and reckless behaviour knowing he has a potential of getting hit by vehicles on public road. An induced risk to economic loss of road users...
Can also go sue Transport department too for allowing risk cyclists on public roads...
The only way to revenge these motherfucker cyclists who caused road accident have induced economic loss to the country causing traffic jams to cars, trucks and buses business earnings.....
Time is money for the car road users...
Commoners can sue him for economic lost hours stopping, stalling and blocking car users whose livelihood depend on no accident road usage.
Crowdfund to sue this white trash to show that he is a menace to road users stalling the country economic loss from this risk taker cyclist... claim economic loss worth billions of dollars for the car road users.
Chao angmoh knows only to claim his economic loss than how about the country economic loss of his menace and reckless behaviour knowing he has a potential of getting hit by vehicles on public road. An induced risk to economic loss of road users...
Can also go sue Transport department too for allowing risk cyclists on public roads...
The only way to revenge these motherfucker cyclists who caused road accident have induced economic loss to the country causing traffic jams to cars, trucks and buses business earnings.....
Time is money for the car road users...
Last edited:
sillypore laws are outrageously nonsense!
such foreign talent who earns millions in sinkieland do not have have any personal insurance or medical insurance for this instance !???
why is there 100% liability on driver whom he had not broken any traffic rules but poor in safety engagements where "safety" takes 2 to clap???
was cyclist in the middle of left lane?
can driver anticipate a slower moving cyclist than road limits appears in front of him the moment driver cuts onto left lane at speed from middle lanes?
why are all the consequences of an erroneous cyclist behaviorists not considered?
it is very very obvious there are cahoots between insurances with bloody sinkie law that are all trying to raise premiums to all transport insurances on sillypore roads!
and bloody sinkie law is instrumental to these commercial schemes!
this country's jurisdiction is just full of shits !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
such foreign talent who earns millions in sinkieland do not have have any personal insurance or medical insurance for this instance !???
why is there 100% liability on driver whom he had not broken any traffic rules but poor in safety engagements where "safety" takes 2 to clap???
was cyclist in the middle of left lane?
can driver anticipate a slower moving cyclist than road limits appears in front of him the moment driver cuts onto left lane at speed from middle lanes?
why are all the consequences of an erroneous cyclist behaviorists not considered?
it is very very obvious there are cahoots between insurances with bloody sinkie law that are all trying to raise premiums to all transport insurances on sillypore roads!
and bloody sinkie law is instrumental to these commercial schemes!
this country's jurisdiction is just full of shits !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cyclists take priority because they were around long before cars were invented.
and the frontline bank staff have to take all the shit from customers everyday who lost money on their investments, being paid $2500 a month?
cheebye, that will jack up cost of car insurance, fuck this amdk for cycling on the road, should have just killed him
7 years to close this case 
On Nov 19, 2014, at 8pm, Mr Pollmann, who is married and the father of two children, was cycling along Brickland Road in Bukit Batok when Ye Xianrong's car crashed into him from behind.
According to a High Court judgment issued in October 2017, Ye, 36, was checking his blind spot for traffic before filtering into another lane. Failing to keep a lookout ahead, he got too close to the cyclist. He jammed his brakes when he realised they were about to collide, but it was too late.
Mr Pollmann was thrown off his bicycle and sustained serious head injuries, spending six months in hospital.
On Nov 19, 2014, at 8pm, Mr Pollmann, who is married and the father of two children, was cycling along Brickland Road in Bukit Batok when Ye Xianrong's car crashed into him from behind.
According to a High Court judgment issued in October 2017, Ye, 36, was checking his blind spot for traffic before filtering into another lane. Failing to keep a lookout ahead, he got too close to the cyclist. He jammed his brakes when he realised they were about to collide, but it was too late.
Mr Pollmann was thrown off his bicycle and sustained serious head injuries, spending six months in hospital.
Some of the jobs are much better suited for the ang mohs... early childhood education, certain creative arty-farty jobs, management, HR etc.
In fact, ang mohs, Japs and Koreans were the original three main sources of FTs since long ago, if you disregard the jiuhu folks. This was before the rise of Tiongland and the CECA nonsense, and before other SE Asian countries started also exporting PMETs instead of merely maids, construction workers and food sellers.
In fact, ang mohs, Japs and Koreans were the original three main sources of FTs since long ago, if you disregard the jiuhu folks. This was before the rise of Tiongland and the CECA nonsense, and before other SE Asian countries started also exporting PMETs instead of merely maids, construction workers and food sellers.
That was the time after horse carriage where bicycle kills horses.
If this bastard can prove that his livelyhold depends on riding bicycle to work at the time of his accident than he can claim loss of income.
He was given a car from the company but he abused the benefit given it to her wife to use. He has chosen to ride bicycle to work induced risk of road accident on public roads.
if he use this bicycle for entertainment purposes, such as exercise or pleasure than it is outside of the scope to claim loss of income from accident.
He can be sued by car road users for economic losses by F&B, or other related biz, cause cancellation becos of this motherfucker cyclist caused an accident on the road and caused hours of traffic jam.
Time to crowdfund to sue this angmoh bastard who think only his economic loss matters. Sue him for billions of economic loss to the business of his induced risk road accident...
fuck off menace cyclist...
If this bastard can prove that his livelyhold depends on riding bicycle to work at the time of his accident than he can claim loss of income.
He was given a car from the company but he abused the benefit given it to her wife to use. He has chosen to ride bicycle to work induced risk of road accident on public roads.
if he use this bicycle for entertainment purposes, such as exercise or pleasure than it is outside of the scope to claim loss of income from accident.
He can be sued by car road users for economic losses by F&B, or other related biz, cause cancellation becos of this motherfucker cyclist caused an accident on the road and caused hours of traffic jam.
Time to crowdfund to sue this angmoh bastard who think only his economic loss matters. Sue him for billions of economic loss to the business of his induced risk road accident...
fuck off menace cyclist...
Cycling is a means of transport and a good exercise. More motorists should give it a go.
So let's get into it.
Let's crowdfund to help the driver who knock him.
A company give an exceutive a car is for his safety going to work or going home aftervwork.
No cycling to work or business and insurance doesn't cover cycling to work or business so is the employer work agreement.
Cyclying outside of work time is at cyclist risk and is not covered under employer agreement.
As such he cannot claims economic loss of income if he got an accident outside his scope of work.
But he is liable to be sued by car owner for his induced risk of a road accident of being knock down by vehicles.
His induced risk of causing a road accident will cause traffic jam and economic loss to businesses whose business depend on clear roads free from menace cyclists hoarding roads and a road accident traffic jam from cyclists.
Let's crowdfund to help the driver who knock him.
A company give an exceutive a car is for his safety going to work or going home aftervwork.
No cycling to work or business and insurance doesn't cover cycling to work or business so is the employer work agreement.
Cyclying outside of work time is at cyclist risk and is not covered under employer agreement.
As such he cannot claims economic loss of income if he got an accident outside his scope of work.
But he is liable to be sued by car owner for his induced risk of a road accident of being knock down by vehicles.
His induced risk of causing a road accident will cause traffic jam and economic loss to businesses whose business depend on clear roads free from menace cyclists hoarding roads and a road accident traffic jam from cyclists.
Last edited:
It is about time to come up with cyclist risk insurance and charge a bomb fee to the cyclist... go claim from insurance...
The clause of cycling to work or biz or cycling for entertainment the insurance is different.
Then the clause of is there an alternative transport to use than cycling to work...
Then a clause of how and where he ride his bicycle and he can only ride a fix road and destination, and not during peak hours.
Is he covered with protective gears to protect his bones, skull and flesh in case of an road accident.
This will nail these bastard cyclists restricted to fix road to be covered by insurance or risk losing his own life at his perils....
The clause of cycling to work or biz or cycling for entertainment the insurance is different.
Then the clause of is there an alternative transport to use than cycling to work...
Then a clause of how and where he ride his bicycle and he can only ride a fix road and destination, and not during peak hours.
Is he covered with protective gears to protect his bones, skull and flesh in case of an road accident.
This will nail these bastard cyclists restricted to fix road to be covered by insurance or risk losing his own life at his perils....
If everyone cycled the world would be a much better place. Give it a go you won't regret it.
Similar threads
