How come part 2 and 3 no longer airing? But on the surface I am impress by Dr. Vincent SDP and Gerard of WP. Their presentation and rebuttal sounds structure and concise but not so for Lina and the Malay guy from SDA. They really made themselves looked bad.
Was very impressed with VW. He must surely be a threat to the MIW. A pity he joined SDP. Pray hard he goes for a SMC instead of teaming up in GRC.
Indeed. If VW doesn't get elected while someone like Tin Pei Ling walks straight into Parliament, there's something very wrong with the system.
TOC Interview With Vincent Wijeysingha
YOu can give Tan Pei Lin 45 minutes in the forum and Dr Chee Soon Juan just 15 minutes to counter. He will send her crying for Papa Mama after the show and than the whole PAP gang will come to support her emotionally and CNA will call off such future programmes to save PAP more face.
Indeed. If VW doesn't get elected while someone like Tin Pei Ling walks straight into Parliament, there's something very wrong with the system.
TOC Interview With Vincent Wijeysingha
I have said all along, to me GRC is not constitutional as it does not recognize my right to vote based on the politician rather then the party.
I have said all along, to me GRC is not constitutional as it does not recognize my right to vote based on the politician rather then the party.
Would very much like to see WP Low Thia Kiang, Sylvia Lim and their secret weapon Chen Show Mao debate as a team , will definitely be a box office if done in debate style like those of junior college and university.
PAP will send in all the senior counsels as a team?Would very much like to see WP Low Thia Kiang, Sylvia Lim and their secret weapon Chen Show Mao debate as a team , will definitely be a box office if done in debate style like those of junior college and university. Perhaps the govt should seriously consider such option as it is good for the development of great leaders and politicians.
The one who devised the GRC system must be rewarded with order of temasek medal
PAP will send in all the senior counsels as a team?
Indeed there is already something wrong with the system and its called GRC. I figured that those PAPPIES knew years ago that if the election is based on a SMC system they are going to lose lots of seats. So with all the gerrymandering, they hit upon a near sure win formula of GRC and each time the percentage seems to drop then they resort back to the usual gerrymandering again. I have said all along, to me GRC is not constitutional as it does not recognize my right to vote based on the politician rather then the party.
Then GMS should enter the battleground. GMS alone can kick the balls of at least 3 Senior Counsels.
GRC system is not invented by pap. it's called the party block vote in electoral terms. Cameroon, Chad, Djibouti all world famous admired democracies used party block vote for parliamentary elections long before us in 1988. Cameron lagi best, 300 lawmakers all elected in 1 party block. "1 GRC for the whole of Cameron."
PAP probably didn't invent NCMP system too. Ecuador used to have an electoral system which if the second-place party wins half the votes of the first party, it is rewarded with a seat. ( best loser seats )
PAP champion, our electoral system all copied from first world African and South American democracies.