• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Come in & watch CNA political forum, opposition beat PAP hands down

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
From the debate, it is very clear that the FAPee TRAITORS are bent on their pro-FTrash stance and sucking dry Sporns efficiency. While the Oppos seek to reverse that to allow Sporns to regain their nationhood and control of their future. Ask yourself which you prefer for yourself and children at the voting booth. There are no short of capable Sporns who are willing to serve the country, but refuse to do so under the evil Leegime. But if the FAPee TRAITORS are toppled, they will answer to the call of the nation, so don't be taken in by the FAPee TRAITORS' BS that only they can run the govt. Go with your heart!
 

Frankiestine

Alfrescian
Loyal
How come part 2 and 3 no longer airing? But on the surface I am impress by Dr. Vincent SDP and Gerard of WP. Their presentation and rebuttal sounds structure and concise but not so for Lina and the Malay guy from SDA. They really made themselves looked bad.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How come part 2 and 3 no longer airing? But on the surface I am impress by Dr. Vincent SDP and Gerard of WP. Their presentation and rebuttal sounds structure and concise but not so for Lina and the Malay guy from SDA. They really made themselves looked bad.

Was very impressed with VW. He must surely be a threat to the MIW. A pity he joined SDP. Pray hard he goes for a SMC instead of teaming up in GRC.
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Indeed. If VW doesn't get elected while someone like Tin Pei Ling walks straight into Parliament, there's something very wrong with the system.

TOC Interview With Vincent Wijeysingha

YOu can give Tan Pei Lin 45 minutes in the forum and Dr Chee Soon Juan just 15 minutes to counter. He will send her crying for Papa Mama after the show and than the whole PAP gang will come to support her emotionally and CNA will call off such future programmes to save PAP more face.
 

Khun Ying Pojaman

Alfrescian
Loyal
YOu can give Tan Pei Lin 45 minutes in the forum and Dr Chee Soon Juan just 15 minutes to counter. He will send her crying for Papa Mama after the show and than the whole PAP gang will come to support her emotionally and CNA will call off such future programmes to save PAP more face.

I'm very sure someone of Dr Chee's stature will not do such a thing.

But for the entire 45 minutes, Miss Tin will think and think.
 

Frankiestine

Alfrescian
Loyal
Indeed. If VW doesn't get elected while someone like Tin Pei Ling walks straight into Parliament, there's something very wrong with the system.

TOC Interview With Vincent Wijeysingha

Indeed there is already something wrong with the system and its called GRC. I figured that those PAPPIES knew years ago that if the election is based on a SMC system they are going to lose lots of seats. So with all the gerrymandering, they hit upon a near sure win formula of GRC and each time the percentage seems to drop then they resort back to the usual gerrymandering again. I have said all along, to me GRC is not constitutional as it does not recognize my right to vote based on the politician rather then the party.
 

aangsc

Alfrescian
Loyal
Would very much like to see WP Low Thia Kiang, Sylvia Lim and their secret weapon Chen Show Mao debate as a team , will definitely be a box office if done in debate style like those of junior college and university. Perhaps the govt should seriously consider such option as it is good for the development of great leaders and politicians.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
I have said all along, to me GRC is not constitutional as it does not recognize my right to vote based on the politician rather then the party.

Does the constitution specifically state that voting for an individual is a right of every singaporean?
 

Khun Ying Pojaman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Would very much like to see WP Low Thia Kiang, Sylvia Lim and their secret weapon Chen Show Mao debate as a team , will definitely be a box office if done in debate style like those of junior college and university.

You're going to be disappointed because WP has positioned itself as a PAP back-up, not alternative. WP becomes relevant only, according to WP tagline, "if PAP falters". Indirectly, WP is saying that PAP has yet to falter.

So with the mass, indiscriminate influx of foreign workers taking over PMET jobs, PAP has not faltered in policy terms. With public housing screaming through the roof, PAP has not faltered in policy terms.

Having said that, I will still vote for opposition, WP or not. Just don't expect WP to debate. They're PAP's 'B' Team, in reality.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Would very much like to see WP Low Thia Kiang, Sylvia Lim and their secret weapon Chen Show Mao debate as a team , will definitely be a box office if done in debate style like those of junior college and university. Perhaps the govt should seriously consider such option as it is good for the development of great leaders and politicians.
PAP will send in all the senior counsels as a team?
 

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The one who devised the GRC system must be rewarded with order of temasek medal

GRC system is not invented by pap. it's called the party block vote in electoral terms. Cameroon, Chad, Djibouti all world famous admired democracies used party block vote for parliamentary elections long before us in 1988. Cameron lagi best, 300 lawmakers all elected in 1 party block. "1 GRC for the whole of Cameron."

PAP probably didn't invent NCMP system too. Ecuador used to have an electoral system which if the second-place party wins half the votes of the first party, it is rewarded with a seat. ( best loser seats )

PAP champion, our electoral system all copied from first world African and South American democracies. :biggrin:
 

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Indeed there is already something wrong with the system and its called GRC. I figured that those PAPPIES knew years ago that if the election is based on a SMC system they are going to lose lots of seats. So with all the gerrymandering, they hit upon a near sure win formula of GRC and each time the percentage seems to drop then they resort back to the usual gerrymandering again. I have said all along, to me GRC is not constitutional as it does not recognize my right to vote based on the politician rather then the party.

PAP are not going to lose a lot of seats with 66% popular vote. In FPTP system, if a party had a landslide 60% popular vote, they should expect to win at least 90% of seats.

GRC not constitutional? you vote for the party based on the candidates and their party. if you want to differ between candidates and party, that's your problem. :biggrin:
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
There you go again. You have done this so many times. If you do not know how these things work at least read about it and educate yourself. We are talking about Westminister model that has been modified extensively. You might as well cite Iraq, USSR and China. They all operate one form of block voting or another.

People talk about cars and you talk about planes. Except for being in the transportation category they are worlds apart.


GRC system is not invented by pap. it's called the party block vote in electoral terms. Cameroon, Chad, Djibouti all world famous admired democracies used party block vote for parliamentary elections long before us in 1988. Cameron lagi best, 300 lawmakers all elected in 1 party block. "1 GRC for the whole of Cameron."

PAP probably didn't invent NCMP system too. Ecuador used to have an electoral system which if the second-place party wins half the votes of the first party, it is rewarded with a seat. ( best loser seats )

PAP champion, our electoral system all copied from first world African and South American democracies. :biggrin:
 
Top