Chinese Vaccine is a Bloody Joke

Froggy

Alfrescian (InfP) + Mod
Moderator
Generous Asset
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
28,877
Points
113
The Pfizer vaccine showed efficacy of 95%
The Moderna vaccine was 94.1%
Sinovac is 50.4% DAFUG



https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/C...sappoints-at-50.4-efficacy-latest-Brazil-data

Sinovac vaccine disappoints at 50.4% efficacy: latest Brazil data
Results come as scientists slam biomed center for raising 'unrealistic' hopes

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F8%2F8%2F7%2F0%2F31720788-4-eng-GB%2FCropped-1610500961RTX8LW9X_resized.JPG

The Butantan biomedical production center in Sao Paulo, Brazil, is being blasted by scientists and observers for releasing partial data only days ago that generated unrealistic expectations. © Reuters
January 13, 2021 10:34 JST

SAO PAULO (Reuters) -- A coronavirus vaccine developed by China's Sinovac Biotech was just 50.4% effective at preventing symptomatic infections in a Brazilian trial, researchers said on Tuesday, barely enough for regulatory approval and well below the rate announced last week.

The latest results are a major disappointment for Brazil, as the Chinese vaccine is one of two that the federal government has lined up to begin immunization during the second wave of the world's second-deadliest COVID-19 outbreak.

Several scientists and observers blasted the Butantan biomedical center for releasing partial data just days ago that generated unrealistic expectations. The confusion may add to skepticism in Brazil about the Chinese vaccine, which President Jair Bolsonaro has criticized, questioning its "origins."

"We have a good vaccine. Not the best vaccine in the world. Not the ideal vaccine," said microbiologist Natalia Pasternak, criticizing Butantan's triumphant tone.

Last week, the Brazilian researchers had celebrated results showing 78% efficacy against "mild-to-severe" COVID-19 cases, a rate they later described as "clinical efficacy."

They said nothing at the time about another group of "very mild" infections among those who received the vaccine that did not require clinical assistance.

Ricardo Palacios, medical director for clinical research at Butantan, said on Tuesday that the new lower efficacy finding included data on those "very mild" cases.

"We need better communicators," said Gonzalo Vecina Neto, a professor of public health at the University of Sao Paulo and former head of Brazilian health regulator Anvisa.

Piecemeal disclosures about Chinese vaccine trials globally have raised concerns that they are not subject to the same public scrutiny as U.S. and European alternatives.

Palacios and officials in the Sao Paulo state government, which funds Butantan, emphasized the good news that none of the volunteers inoculated with CoronaVac had to be hospitalized with COVID-19 symptoms.

Public health experts said that alone will be a relief for Brazilian hospitals that are buckling under the strain of surging case loads. However, it will take longer to curb the pandemic with a vaccine that allows so many mild cases.

"It's a vaccine that will start the process of overcoming the pandemic," Pasternak said.

Researchers at Butantan delayed announcement of their results three times, blaming a confidentiality clause in a contract with Sinovac.

In the meantime, Turkish researchers said last month that CoronaVac was 91.25% effective based on an interim analysis. Indonesia gave the vaccine emergency use approval on Monday based on interim data showing it is 65% effective.

Butantan officials said the design of the Brazilian study, focusing on frontline health workers during a severe outbreak in Brazil and including elderly volunteers, made it impossible to compare the results directly with other trials or vaccines.

Still, COVID-19 vaccines in use from Pfizer Inc with partner BioNTech SE and Moderna Inc proved to be about 95% effective in preventing illness in their pivotal late-state trials.

The disappointing CoronaVac data is the latest setback for vaccination efforts in Brazil, where more than 200,000 people have died since the outbreak began - the worst death toll outside the United States.

Brazil's national immunization program currently relies on CoronaVac and the vaccine developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca Plc - neither of which has received regulatory approval in Brazil.

Anvisa, which has stipulated an efficacy rate of at least 50% for vaccines in the pandemic, has already pressed Butantan for more details of its study, after it filed for emergency use authorization on Friday.

The regulator said it will meet on Sunday to decide on emergency use requests for CoronaVac and the British vaccine.

AstraZeneca failed to deliver active ingredients to Brazil over the weekend, leaving the government scrambling to import finished doses of the vaccine from India to begin inoculations.
 
So it is 50-50 only. 50% chance you'll live, 50% chance you'll die.
 
I wouldn't take any of them for the time being.

In the meantime the best protection against Covid is to catch Covid. Nothing primes the immune system better than an actual infection with a real virus.

Get it while you're young. If you're under 40 the odds of survival are even better compared to Influenza. The immunity should then stand you in good stead for far longer than any vaccine.

Growing up catching nasty viruses and surviving was part of the baptism of fire plus it's good for the soul.
 
KNN in this case If my uncle made appointment to inject and on the spot found out is sinovac can chicken out or die die force to inject? KNN if chicken out what is the penalty KNN
 
I wouldn't take any of them for the time being.

In the meantime the best protection against Covid is to catch Covid. Nothing primes the immune system better than an actual infection with a real virus.

Get it while you're young. If you're under 40 the odds of survival are even better compared to Influenza. The immunity should then stand you in good stead for far longer than any vaccine.

Growing up catching nasty viruses and surviving was part of the baptism of fire plus it's good for the soul.

While at it, you might inject yourself with HIV (virus that causes AIDS) as part of your baptism of fire... it could be good for your soul as well.
 
Inferior slanties with low IQ can only produce poor shoddy products. Cheap copy cats, copy paste items.

cheap knock offs as they are known.

slanties were, are and always will be an inferior subspecies

genetically inferior
 
Lee Hsien Loong and Ho Ching love to kiss the ass of the CCP regime, so no choice, had to order a shipment of Sinovac vaccines despite already procuring Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, so no one's feelings got hurt.

Vaccine diplomacy = 疫苗外交. :biggrin:
 


stinkies are an ugly lot

genetically inferior slanties + black ah neh

yucks....

:poop:

the genetic cr*p of chinks + ah nehs

come to think of it

stinkies got the worse end of the bargain in everything

no legend
no history
ugly looks
no originality
no creativity
no initiative
copy cat
copy paste
and still falls short of target

just an inferior breed
even uglier shorter darker than their northern slanty cousins
and uglier darker shorter than their northern ceca cousins
both of whom are as ugly as they get too

and historical underachievers
 
The Pfizer vaccine showed efficacy of 95%
The Moderna vaccine was 94.1%
Sinovac is 50.4% DAFUG



https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/C...sappoints-at-50.4-efficacy-latest-Brazil-data

Sinovac vaccine disappoints at 50.4% efficacy: latest Brazil data
Results come as scientists slam biomed center for raising 'unrealistic' hopes

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F8%2F8%2F7%2F0%2F31720788-4-eng-GB%2FCropped-1610500961RTX8LW9X_resized.JPG

The Butantan biomedical production center in Sao Paulo, Brazil, is being blasted by scientists and observers for releasing partial data only days ago that generated unrealistic expectations. © Reuters
January 13, 2021 10:34 JST

SAO PAULO (Reuters) -- A coronavirus vaccine developed by China's Sinovac Biotech was just 50.4% effective at preventing symptomatic infections in a Brazilian trial, researchers said on Tuesday, barely enough for regulatory approval and well below the rate announced last week.

The latest results are a major disappointment for Brazil, as the Chinese vaccine is one of two that the federal government has lined up to begin immunization during the second wave of the world's second-deadliest COVID-19 outbreak.

Several scientists and observers blasted the Butantan biomedical center for releasing partial data just days ago that generated unrealistic expectations. The confusion may add to skepticism in Brazil about the Chinese vaccine, which President Jair Bolsonaro has criticized, questioning its "origins."

"We have a good vaccine. Not the best vaccine in the world. Not the ideal vaccine," said microbiologist Natalia Pasternak, criticizing Butantan's triumphant tone.

Last week, the Brazilian researchers had celebrated results showing 78% efficacy against "mild-to-severe" COVID-19 cases, a rate they later described as "clinical efficacy."

They said nothing at the time about another group of "very mild" infections among those who received the vaccine that did not require clinical assistance.

Ricardo Palacios, medical director for clinical research at Butantan, said on Tuesday that the new lower efficacy finding included data on those "very mild" cases.

"We need better communicators," said Gonzalo Vecina Neto, a professor of public health at the University of Sao Paulo and former head of Brazilian health regulator Anvisa.

Piecemeal disclosures about Chinese vaccine trials globally have raised concerns that they are not subject to the same public scrutiny as U.S. and European alternatives.

Palacios and officials in the Sao Paulo state government, which funds Butantan, emphasized the good news that none of the volunteers inoculated with CoronaVac had to be hospitalized with COVID-19 symptoms.

Public health experts said that alone will be a relief for Brazilian hospitals that are buckling under the strain of surging case loads. However, it will take longer to curb the pandemic with a vaccine that allows so many mild cases.

"It's a vaccine that will start the process of overcoming the pandemic," Pasternak said.

Researchers at Butantan delayed announcement of their results three times, blaming a confidentiality clause in a contract with Sinovac.

In the meantime, Turkish researchers said last month that CoronaVac was 91.25% effective based on an interim analysis. Indonesia gave the vaccine emergency use approval on Monday based on interim data showing it is 65% effective.

Butantan officials said the design of the Brazilian study, focusing on frontline health workers during a severe outbreak in Brazil and including elderly volunteers, made it impossible to compare the results directly with other trials or vaccines.

Still, COVID-19 vaccines in use from Pfizer Inc with partner BioNTech SE and Moderna Inc proved to be about 95% effective in preventing illness in their pivotal late-state trials.

The disappointing CoronaVac data is the latest setback for vaccination efforts in Brazil, where more than 200,000 people have died since the outbreak began - the worst death toll outside the United States.

Brazil's national immunization program currently relies on CoronaVac and the vaccine developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca Plc - neither of which has received regulatory approval in Brazil.

Anvisa, which has stipulated an efficacy rate of at least 50% for vaccines in the pandemic, has already pressed Butantan for more details of its study, after it filed for emergency use authorization on Friday.

The regulator said it will meet on Sunday to decide on emergency use requests for CoronaVac and the British vaccine.

AstraZeneca failed to deliver active ingredients to Brazil over the weekend, leaving the government scrambling to import finished doses of the vaccine from India to begin inoculations.

China's Covid test kits had an accuracy rate of around 30%, countries had to return them for a refund. You could get better odds flipping a coin. :roflmao:


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...cloud-china-s-european-outreach-over-covid-19

In Turkey, which imported its first batch of “several thousand” kits in early March, officials determined an accuracy rate of less than 35%, according to a senior official with direct knowledge of the matter. Their use was immediately suspended.
 
While at it, you might inject yourself with HIV (virus that causes AIDS) as part of your baptism of fire... it could be good for your soul as well.

Unfortunately it does not work that way for HIV because the virus attacks the very immune system that is supposed to fight it.

For diseases such as HIV mankind's defense is genetic diversity. There is a proportion of the population that are immune to HIV and they will breed descendants who are also immune and mankind will survive the HIV scourge.

https://www.medicaldaily.com/why-some-people-are-immune-hiv-ebola-and-other-diseases-397940

For as long as disease has existed, there have been a select few people who have a natural resistance to certain illnesses. Whether it be a virus or genetic condition, natural resistance has long been documented and, for the most part, continues to baffle scientists. However, new research has started to give us an idea as to why some are born with such a fortunate trait.

HIV
There are some people who, despite frequent exposure to HIV, still don't contract the virus. According to The Tech, this is due to a mutation in the CCR5 gene called CCR5-delta 32.

Normally, HIV infects the body by grabbing onto the CD4 receptor and its co-receptor CCR5 and using them to enter the cell, and then reprogram it to spread throughout a body. However, in individuals with this mutation, the virus is unable to enter cells. The CCR5-delta32 mutation results in a smaller protein that isn't on the outside of the cell anymore. Most forms of HIV cannot infect cells if there is no CCR5 on the surface. People with two copies of the CCR5-delta32 gene (inherited from both parents) are virtually immune to HIV infection.
 
Fuck u dickhead. Fake news. The usual white trash used devious ploy to destroy Chinese and China name. Bad mouthing Chinese and China is safer. Try bad mouthing Allah and Muslims if u hv balls.

Motherfucker u.

1.6B people given 1.6% are supertalent they can't go wrong.

fucking Brazilian only good at removing cunt hairs might as well boil the hairs and turn into soup to treat 病毒.

Are u sure Pfizer is good.... nah.... marketing only like BE opium are arbitrate contain industrial chemicals and 5% opium only...

Fuck u frog man...



The Pfizer vaccine showed efficacy of 95%
The Moderna vaccine was 94.1%
Sinovac is 50.4% DAFUG



https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/C...sappoints-at-50.4-efficacy-latest-Brazil-data

Sinovac vaccine disappoints at 50.4% efficacy: latest Brazil data
Results come as scientists slam biomed center for raising 'unrealistic' hopes

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F8%2F8%2F7%2F0%2F31720788-4-eng-GB%2FCropped-1610500961RTX8LW9X_resized.JPG

The Butantan biomedical production center in Sao Paulo, Brazil, is being blasted by scientists and observers for releasing partial data only days ago that generated unrealistic expectations. © Reuters
January 13, 2021 10:34 JST

SAO PAULO (Reuters) -- A coronavirus vaccine developed by China's Sinovac Biotech was just 50.4% effective at preventing symptomatic infections in a Brazilian trial, researchers said on Tuesday, barely enough for regulatory approval and well below the rate announced last week.

The latest results are a major disappointment for Brazil, as the Chinese vaccine is one of two that the federal government has lined up to begin immunization during the second wave of the world's second-deadliest COVID-19 outbreak.

Several scientists and observers blasted the Butantan biomedical center for releasing partial data just days ago that generated unrealistic expectations. The confusion may add to skepticism in Brazil about the Chinese vaccine, which President Jair Bolsonaro has criticized, questioning its "origins."

"We have a good vaccine. Not the best vaccine in the world. Not the ideal vaccine," said microbiologist Natalia Pasternak, criticizing Butantan's triumphant tone.

Last week, the Brazilian researchers had celebrated results showing 78% efficacy against "mild-to-severe" COVID-19 cases, a rate they later described as "clinical efficacy."

They said nothing at the time about another group of "very mild" infections among those who received the vaccine that did not require clinical assistance.

Ricardo Palacios, medical director for clinical research at Butantan, said on Tuesday that the new lower efficacy finding included data on those "very mild" cases.

"We need better communicators," said Gonzalo Vecina Neto, a professor of public health at the University of Sao Paulo and former head of Brazilian health regulator Anvisa.

Piecemeal disclosures about Chinese vaccine trials globally have raised concerns that they are not subject to the same public scrutiny as U.S. and European alternatives.

Palacios and officials in the Sao Paulo state government, which funds Butantan, emphasized the good news that none of the volunteers inoculated with CoronaVac had to be hospitalized with COVID-19 symptoms.

Public health experts said that alone will be a relief for Brazilian hospitals that are buckling under the strain of surging case loads. However, it will take longer to curb the pandemic with a vaccine that allows so many mild cases.

"It's a vaccine that will start the process of overcoming the pandemic," Pasternak said.

Researchers at Butantan delayed announcement of their results three times, blaming a confidentiality clause in a contract with Sinovac.

In the meantime, Turkish researchers said last month that CoronaVac was 91.25% effective based on an interim analysis. Indonesia gave the vaccine emergency use approval on Monday based on interim data showing it is 65% effective.

Butantan officials said the design of the Brazilian study, focusing on frontline health workers during a severe outbreak in Brazil and including elderly volunteers, made it impossible to compare the results directly with other trials or vaccines.

Still, COVID-19 vaccines in use from Pfizer Inc with partner BioNTech SE and Moderna Inc proved to be about 95% effective in preventing illness in their pivotal late-state trials.

The disappointing CoronaVac data is the latest setback for vaccination efforts in Brazil, where more than 200,000 people have died since the outbreak began - the worst death toll outside the United States.

Brazil's national immunization program currently relies on CoronaVac and the vaccine developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca Plc - neither of which has received regulatory approval in Brazil.

Anvisa, which has stipulated an efficacy rate of at least 50% for vaccines in the pandemic, has already pressed Butantan for more details of its study, after it filed for emergency use authorization on Friday.

The regulator said it will meet on Sunday to decide on emergency use requests for CoronaVac and the British vaccine.

AstraZeneca failed to deliver active ingredients to Brazil over the weekend, leaving the government scrambling to import finished doses of the vaccine from India to begin inoculations.
 
Fuck u dickhead. Fake news. The usual white trash used devious ploy to destroy Chinese and China name. Bad mouthing Chinese and China is safer. Try bad mouthing Allah and Muslims if u hv balls.

Motherfucker u.

1.6B people given 1.6% are supertalent they can't go wrong.

fucking Brazilian only good at removing cunt hairs might as well boil the hairs and turn into soup to treat 病毒.

Are u sure Pfizer is good.... nah.... marketing only like BE opium are arbitrate contain industrial chemicals and 5% opium only...

Fuck u frog man...
U are a defnitely a CCP member. Becos u defend them so vigorously when everybody already know their products CMI. Their vaccine is the same CMI.
 
Fuck you. Motherfucker. U are fake angmoh white supremist dog.

U are a defnitely a CCP member. Becos u defend them so vigorously when everybody already know their products CMI. Their vaccine is the same CMI.
 
Fuck you. Motherfucker. U are fake angmoh white supremist dog.
U are an angry & crazy communist. Angmoh politics is crazy but their medical is good. CCP is bad with politics & medical. Better they just focus on TCM.
 
Motherfucket frogman.

If Chinese vaccine is that bad the Pfizer lab wld hv produced evidence in their own lab in US.

why need to use a 3rd world country to bad mouth Chinese vaccine?

Bloody wicked coward chao angmoh dog lab.

what is Venezuela country? Peasant 3rd world bad dog country.

China has the best no. 1 advanced supercomputer in the world, can they go wrong with the vaccine?

Does Pfizer used the best no.1 supercomputer in the world in US to do the product Testing and making? Nothing? So shut the fuck up, dickhead.

it can be 50% way of the mark? U are such an idiot brainwashed motherfucker.

getting a 3rd world country lab to do the testing? Come on man, I thought u hve big brain? Now I know u are m&d, kosong inside...

:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:


The Pfizer vaccine showed efficacy of 95%
The Moderna vaccine was 94.1%
Sinovac is 50.4% DAFUG



https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/C...sappoints-at-50.4-efficacy-latest-Brazil-data

Sinovac vaccine disappoints at 50.4% efficacy: latest Brazil data
Results come as scientists slam biomed center for raising 'unrealistic' hopes

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F8%2F8%2F7%2F0%2F31720788-4-eng-GB%2FCropped-1610500961RTX8LW9X_resized.JPG

The Butantan biomedical production center in Sao Paulo, Brazil, is being blasted by scientists and observers for releasing partial data only days ago that generated unrealistic expectations. © Reuters
January 13, 2021 10:34 JST

SAO PAULO (Reuters) -- A coronavirus vaccine developed by China's Sinovac Biotech was just 50.4% effective at preventing symptomatic infections in a Brazilian trial, researchers said on Tuesday, barely enough for regulatory approval and well below the rate announced last week.

The latest results are a major disappointment for Brazil, as the Chinese vaccine is one of two that the federal government has lined up to begin immunization during the second wave of the world's second-deadliest COVID-19 outbreak.

Several scientists and observers blasted the Butantan biomedical center for releasing partial data just days ago that generated unrealistic expectations. The confusion may add to skepticism in Brazil about the Chinese vaccine, which President Jair Bolsonaro has criticized, questioning its "origins."

"We have a good vaccine. Not the best vaccine in the world. Not the ideal vaccine," said microbiologist Natalia Pasternak, criticizing Butantan's triumphant tone.

Last week, the Brazilian researchers had celebrated results showing 78% efficacy against "mild-to-severe" COVID-19 cases, a rate they later described as "clinical efficacy."

They said nothing at the time about another group of "very mild" infections among those who received the vaccine that did not require clinical assistance.

Ricardo Palacios, medical director for clinical research at Butantan, said on Tuesday that the new lower efficacy finding included data on those "very mild" cases.

"We need better communicators," said Gonzalo Vecina Neto, a professor of public health at the University of Sao Paulo and former head of Brazilian health regulator Anvisa.

Piecemeal disclosures about Chinese vaccine trials globally have raised concerns that they are not subject to the same public scrutiny as U.S. and European alternatives.

Palacios and officials in the Sao Paulo state government, which funds Butantan, emphasized the good news that none of the volunteers inoculated with CoronaVac had to be hospitalized with COVID-19 symptoms.

Public health experts said that alone will be a relief for Brazilian hospitals that are buckling under the strain of surging case loads. However, it will take longer to curb the pandemic with a vaccine that allows so many mild cases.

"It's a vaccine that will start the process of overcoming the pandemic," Pasternak said.

Researchers at Butantan delayed announcement of their results three times, blaming a confidentiality clause in a contract with Sinovac.

In the meantime, Turkish researchers said last month that CoronaVac was 91.25% effective based on an interim analysis. Indonesia gave the vaccine emergency use approval on Monday based on interim data showing it is 65% effective.

Butantan officials said the design of the Brazilian study, focusing on frontline health workers during a severe outbreak in Brazil and including elderly volunteers, made it impossible to compare the results directly with other trials or vaccines.

Still, COVID-19 vaccines in use from Pfizer Inc with partner BioNTech SE and Moderna Inc proved to be about 95% effective in preventing illness in their pivotal late-state trials.

The disappointing CoronaVac data is the latest setback for vaccination efforts in Brazil, where more than 200,000 people have died since the outbreak began - the worst death toll outside the United States.

Brazil's national immunization program currently relies on CoronaVac and the vaccine developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca Plc - neither of which has received regulatory approval in Brazil.

Anvisa, which has stipulated an efficacy rate of at least 50% for vaccines in the pandemic, has already pressed Butantan for more details of its study, after it filed for emergency use authorization on Friday.

The regulator said it will meet on Sunday to decide on emergency use requests for CoronaVac and the British vaccine.

AstraZeneca failed to deliver active ingredients to Brazil over the weekend, leaving the government scrambling to import finished doses of the vaccine from India to begin inoculations.
 
Go fuck yrself. Change nick again and same shit in you.

Stick to yr original nick if u hv balls...

Waitifuck get new nick fuck u twice each time.

U are an angry & crazy communist. Angmoh politics is crazy but their medical is good. CCP is bad with politics & medical. Better they just focus on TCM.
 
Back
Top