- Joined
- Jun 13, 2024
- Messages
- 612
- Points
- 43
In Singapore, a law quietly exists that could force you to take a vaccine — whether you want it or not.
The Infectious Diseases Act (IDA), recently amended, grants the government the power to order forced vaccinations for any person or group during an outbreak, even if there is merely a suspicion of an outbreak.
( Infectious Diseases Laws in SG
https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Acts.../13-2024/Published/20240404...
)
If you refuse, you face serious consequences:
First-time Offense:
A fine of up to $10,000 or 6 months in jail
Repeat Offenders: Fines can double to $20,000, and jail time can extend to 12 months
No Accountability: Government & Vaccine Manufacturers Protected,
You Are Not
, , , . They are shielded from any legal responsibility — even if you suffer severe side effects or life-threatening reactions.
Before anyone blindly trusts a forced vaccine, it is essential to examine the disturbing history of one of the world’s largest vaccine producers — Pfizer
&
A Pattern of Deception
Since 2002, the company has paid over $3 billion in fines and settlements for various offenses, including:
* Misleading advertising
* Bribing doctors and health officials in multiple countries
* Engaging in false claims related to drug safety
2009 – Pfizer Convicted of Criminal Health Fraud
Fine: $2.3 Billion (Largest in U.S. History)
Crime: Felony misbranding & illegal promotion of Bextra for unapproved uses.
Source: [DOJ Official Release]
https://www.justice.gov/.../justice-department-announces...
This was not a minor regulatory breach—this was a felony conviction. Pfizer actively deceived regulators, doctors, and patients to boost profits, knowingly putting lives at risk.
To force citizens by law (Section 47, IDA) to take medical products from a company convicted of felony fraud is not just reckless—it violates the fundamental right to informed consent under international medical ethics and the Constitution’s guarantee of liberty and security of person.
No government has the moral or legal authority to compel injections from a repeat criminal offender.
If the act of refusal leads to jail under Section 65, this is coercion under duress, not consent.
– $
Crime: Bribing foreign doctors and officials in 8 countries to push drug sales.
SEC Case Summary https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2012-152
When a company bribes health professionals to promote products, it corrupts the integrity of the entire medical system. Pfizer didn’t just market it manipulated medical authorities with cash and incentives.
Mandating injections from a company that used bribery to influence regulatory decisions is a violation of public trust Singaporeans deserve medical neutrality—not forced compliance with products from corrupt corporations.
You cannot claim to uphold science and ethics while mandating products from a company that purchased medical endorsements abroad.
-
In 2021, a whistleblower revealed that during Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trials, data was falsified, patient safety was compromised, and adverse reactions were covered up. Despite this, the vaccine was pushed worldwide.
These claims were detailed in a report published by The BMJ, a reputable medical journal.
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635.abstract
https://science.thewire.in/.../company-that-managed.../
,
In 2024, Pfizer settled over 10,000 lawsuits alleging that the heartburn drug Zantac, which it once marketed, was linked to cancer.
Victims allege that Pfizer knew of the cancer risks but failed to warn consumers.
https://www.reuters.com/.../pfizer-agrees-settle-more.../
https://www.drugwatch.com/.../pfizer-settles-10000.../
– $.
Crime: Overcharging U.S. Medicaid by failing to report lowest prices.
DOJ Press Release
https://www.justice.gov/.../pfizer-agrees-pay-7846...
This is a direct act of economic exploitation of public health systems. Pfizer knowingly overcharged government programs meant to serve the most vulnerable.
If this is how Pfizer treated government health programs elsewhere, what protections do Singaporeans have when we're forced to use their products under threat of prison?
The IDA gives Pfizer blanket protection from liability (Section 67), while giving the people no way to sue for damages.
> We are forced to take the product.
> We cannot refuse.
> And if we’re harmed, we have no legal recourse.
That is not healthcare. That is legislated corporate immunity.
– $.
Crime: Providing luxury meals, speaker fees, and inducements to doctors to push migraine drugs.
Reuters https://www.reuters.com/.../pfizer-pay-597-million-over.../
This case reveals a continued pattern of deception and manipulation. Over a decade after its felony conviction, Pfizer was still buying influence in the medical community.
When our government partners with a company known for backroom deals with doctors, and then criminalizes refusal of their product, your medical freedom is no longer sovereign. It's politicized and weaponized.
The only people who benefit from this arrangement are the pharmaceutical shareholders, not the citizens of Singapore.
‘ , ’
Pfizer’s Criminal History + Temasek’s Conflict of Interest + Erosion of Singaporean Rights
Singaporeans are being subjected to coercive health laws that mandate vaccination under threat of imprisonment all while the state maintains financial interests in the very company producing the vaccine. This creates a conflict of interest so severe that it breaches ethical governance, legal neutrality, and the Singapore Constitution.
Pfizer: A Company with Criminal Track Record
Singapore law is now enforcing medical compliance using products from this exact company.
A lot more at urlr.me/eCSpUW
