Wow, your story gets more interesting every time.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
China's Belt and Road Initiative Has Failed. $200 Billion Gone
- Thread starter Peiweh
- Start date
Wow, your story gets more interesting every time.
They can try, but nobody will sell if it gets sanctioned as a rogue regime like Iran or North Korea. Good luck.
China cannot be isolated. Period.
The chinks are emerging for sure. But they will fuck it up and they will sink before they even get a chance to really ascend. The chink government is wasting money on unprofitable contracts for raw materials. They would waste less money fighting wars in iraq or afghanistan.
The Chinks were smart not to spend their money on unnecessary wars. The people of Iraq and Afghanistan had no issues with the yanks until they were invaded. Now, the yanks have to leave, having wasted ten of billions and nothing to show for it. And leaving a mess for the locals to clean up.
You are not that good but I think you can still offer some advice to the Chinks. So, sign up with a Chink company and be their special adviser. They pay well too.
@JohnTan how would you compare the Tang dynasty to the PAP?
The yanks have nothing to show for it because they had poor strategy in iraq and afghanistan. The guerillas did not run out of troops or weaponry or money throughout the insurgency. I thought that cutting enemy supply of menpower and means of waging war was part of 'Winning A War 101'. The allies used it to great effect in WW2 when they destroyed the axis ability to churn out weapons and resupply. And of course, they killed lots of german troops too.
You appointed yourself the first five-star General in SINKapore?
You can't cut any supply line in Afghanistan or Iraq without winning over the people. The Yanks cause hardship there, instead of providing hope and realization of a better life.
Why would we want to compare the Tang to the PAP?
The PAP is doing well because it is focused on serving the needs of the residents on the ground instead of being fixated with comparing to ancient empires.
Then you made the same fatal mistake as the US generals did.
You can't win over the people there as long as you don't share their religion. The mongols conquered afghanistan because they couldn't give a shit about what the locals thought. And the moslem arabs conquered afghanistan too because they too, don't give a shit about what non-believers think.
I agree with you that the Yanks should not have been in those two countries in the first place. But I also believe that you can win over hearts even if you don't share the same religion.
If those religionists are from East Asia, you might be able to win hearts and minds even if you are from a different religion. The Brits in HK, the Spanish in the Philippines or the French in Indo China are good examples. In islamic societies, it doesn't work. In Singapore, it took the PAP the accomplish it by co-opting m&ds into the government.
I don't see the US co-opting locals into the government in Iraq or Afghanistan. And when they do, the co-opted are publicly labelled as traitors and stooges, and totally denied of any legitimacy by the insurgents. Strangely, the US and their co-opted don't have the balls to call the talibans as pigs or unislamic, and thus, losing the propagand and legitimacy war.
The yanks have every right to be in afghanistan, just like the islamists here believe their moslem armies had every right to invade and ethnically cleanse non-moslem lands throughout history.
At least the yanks aren't sacking afghan or iraqi cities and carting away the local populace as slaves for american citizens. In that comparisons, the yanks have shown the moslem populace way more mercy than a moslem army would ever show non-moslem citizenry.
Coming back to this topic, I'm unsure as to why the chinks would spend so much money on foreign aid. In modern diplomacy, friendship lasts only as long as your money does. What does chinkland expect from all that foreign aid splashed out? More votes at the UN? The chinks already have a veto vote. Military alliance? The niggers don't have a modern army. They can't aid the chinks much. And the chinks already have a military base at Djibouti to guard the sea routes at the Red Sea.
The chinks are better off spending that money in chinkland to expand their own infrastructure or on healthcare, instead of wasting on loser banana republics.
The chinks are better off spending that money in chinkland to expand their own infrastructure or on healthcare, instead of wasting on loser banana republics.
Of course, those African and Middle East despots are easily bribed. How else do you think Tedros got the votes to become the chief of WHO?
Trillions your ass. More than 1/3 of that is in US treasury bonds. US can fuck CCPee anytime with that.
Please do your due diligence before sucking Tiong Cock.
Looks like you're not doing your due diligence as a CCPee cocksucker. You are bringing shame to Winnie the Pooh by posting here.
I think lending to Afrika is riskier. Bo chenghu one there.
everyone has failed in nigger continent so far. tiongs will not be spared.
I'm sure 200 years ago there were camel herders laughing at French engineers digging in the desert sands... called them arrogant, stupid and crazy.
When the Suez Canal was being built, the mega project also had its fair share of foreign and domestic critics/detractors and even saboteurs.
The project faced many political, engineering, manpower and financial issues but got completed in the end.
Today we all know what impact the new passageway had on international trade.
While those camel herders and their descendants continued to herd camels. Building great infrastructures, exploring space are clearly not for some
When the Suez Canal was being built, the mega project also had its fair share of foreign and domestic critics/detractors and even saboteurs.
The project faced many political, engineering, manpower and financial issues but got completed in the end.
Today we all know what impact the new passageway had on international trade.
While those camel herders and their descendants continued to herd camels. Building great infrastructures, exploring space are clearly not for some
Similar threads
