China’s rise to superpower in peace is a first for mankind

[mojito]

Wrong. This century be long to India the new super power.

 

[mudhatter]

you believe ccp (fake) numbers?

i dont believe fake numbers from ceca virus tiongs yanks russkies zionists stinkypura turkey bangla egypt norkies etc etc

if you believe fake numbers from yanks or ceca, then you should believe fake numbers from tiongs.

 

[mudhatter]

example

here are two of the longest supercar convoys in malaysia

650+ and 700+ strong SUPERCAR convoys apaprently.

haven't seen anything CLOSE TO this in ceca virus yet.

truth be told, i don't see that many supercar convoys in yankee territory either.

so lots of countries pump out fake numbers and stats no doubts abt it.








doesn't match their GDP stats. where are proportionately long supercar convoys in ceca virus? turkey? russkie? yankees?

yankee gdp supposed to be what? 50 or 60 times as big as malaysia? so they have to show a supercar convoy that's 35000 to 42000+ strong.

i don't think they have what it takes.

so a lot of these fake gdp stats are pumped out by many countries.

 

[eatshitndie]

like this how to be superpower?

China's military rocket force uncovers 'shortcomings' - PLA Daily​

Fri, September 15, 2023 at 12:06 AM PDT

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinas-military-rocket-force-uncovers-070627949.html

 

[eatshitndie]

example

here are two of the longest supercar convoys in malaysia

650+ and 700+ strong SUPERCAR convoys apaprently.

haven't seen anything CLOSE TO this in ceca virus yet.

truth be told, i don't see that many supercar convoys in yankee territory either.

so lots of countries pump out fake numbers and stats no doubts abt it.








doesn't match their GDP stats. where are proportionately long supercar convoys in ceca virus? turkey? russkie? yankees?

yankee gdp supposed to be what? 50 or 60 times as big as malaysia? so they have to show a supercar convoy that's 35000 to 42000+ strong.

i don't think they have what it takes.

so a lot of these fake gdp stats are pumped out by many countries.

density and size, just like iq and race (pun intended). amerika is too large for all ferraris to assemble in one convoy, but it has the largest owned fleet by far compared to all other cuntries. a 2009 tally by ferrari says it all on relative percentages of all types and models. by end of 2009, amerika had over 36.9k ferraris of all makes and models. by now in 2023 that number should be over 69k, over 69 times more than the numbers in ml and sg combined.
https://ferraris-online.com/how-many-ferraris/

 

[mudhatter]

China & America: The End Game Has Already Arrived…China’s rise to superpower in peace is a first for mankind, ushering in a new world order​

September 9th, 2023

No bombs, no attacks, no wars, no overthrowing of other govts and foreign elections of those who don’t agree with your interests, Imran Khan of Pakistan, being the lastest leaving once again, Pakistan in chaos and misery.

https://johnsonwkchoi.com/2023/09/0...st-for-mankind-ushering-in-a-new-world-order/

View attachment 188738

btw how come tiongs have changed tune and now in their state controlled media calling Imran Khan's ouster a machination of Yankees? Why only now?


seems like 1400 million tiongs dun have enough english speaking authors who can craft a media narrative, and then tiongkok can help pakistan out by bringing Imran Khan to power again.

since now tiongs admit, which they never did in the past, that imran kahn was ousted by yankees and paki military is a yankee orderly, then why can't tiongs PROVE they are a superpower by ousting yankee presence from Pakistan altogether. dun forget, pakis are next to tiongs while yanks come from 10k to 12k km away.

either you admit that tiongs are not a superpower, at all, (this is true0 or you admit that imran kahn was not ousted by yankees through their pakistani agents (this is false). both can't be true.

the truth is tiongs can't even save pakistan next door. wtf is going to line up or align with tiongs?

 

[mudhatter]

density and size, just like iq and race (pun intended). amerika is too large for all ferraris to assemble in one convoy, but it has the largest owned fleet by far compared to all other cuntries. a 2009 tally by ferrari says it all, and this report only focuses on 1 type and or model of ferrari.
https://ferraris-online.com/how-many-ferraris/

excuses.

SUPERCARS are not restricted to ferraris.

and dun forget cars incl SUPERCARS are dirt cheap due to low taxes in ang moh kia countries. they still dun have 35,000 to 42,000 strong supercar convoys.

and that article is also from 2009, 14 years old.

dun make excuses mate.

i haven't seen any 35,000 to 42,000 strong SUPERCAR convoy in yankee territory. or proportionately longer SUPERCAR convoys, not just ferraris.

bearing in mind, cheaper prices (like 10% or 20% of stinkypura prices?), where are these supercar convoys?

 

[eatshitndie]

excuses.

SUPERCARS are not restricted to ferraris.

and dun forget cars incl SUPERCARS are dirt cheap due to low taxes in ang moh kia countries. they still dun have 35,000 to 42,000 strong supercar convoys.

and that article is also from 2009, 14 years old.

dun make excuses mate.

i haven't seen any 35,000 to 42,000 strong SUPERCAR convoy in yankee territory. or proportionately longer SUPERCAR convoys, not just ferraris.

bearing in mind, cheaper prices (like 10% or 20% of stinkypura prices?), where are these supercar convoys?

impossible to assemble a convoy of ferraris over 36.9k strong anywhere in america lah. the largest supercar show in carmel doesn’t even have enough parking space for 6.9k cars in one tight spot the size of sg yeast coast park and fark.

 

[mudhatter]

impossible to assemble a convoy of ferraris over 36.9k strong anywhere in america lah.

yeah because they dont have that many supercars.

dun show me those old cheap ferraris which are aplenty btw in yankee territory. seen plenty of them.

plenty of scrapyards for thousands of old unused fighter and bombers aircrafts though.



why you think supercars are restricted to ferraris? they could be pagani bugattis aston martins mclarens koeniggseggs and they are ALL far cheaper in ang moh countries than stinkypura btw.



we all know why such long convoys arent found in any of these countries. they simply dun possess that many supercars.
dun tell me this counts as a SUPERCAR for yanks

is that how they tallied their sales statistics?

 

[mudhatter]

density and size, just like iq and race (pun intended). amerika is too large for all ferraris to assemble in one convoy, but it has the largest owned fleet by far compared to all other cuntries. a 2009 tally by ferrari says it all on relative percentages of all types and models. by end of 2009, amerika had over 36.9k ferraris of all makes and models. by now in 2023 that number should be over 69k, over 69 times more than the numbers in ml and sg combined.
https://ferraris-online.com/how-many-ferraris/

Oh i see you edited your post.

1. that is not ferrari's OFFICIAL site, that is a voluntary blog kept by a retailer who can't make ends meet.

2. this counts as SUPERCAR in their stats.

3. show us the convoys of ALL supercars. facts speak louder than words.

4. still can't believe this counts as supercar in their stats

 

[mudhatter]

since stinkypura MRT has decisively failed, Malaysia has now surpassed stinkypura in its MRT or public transport system too. stinkypura is an all out failure.

u can thank eunuch loong for that.

a random malaysian MRT trip



clean neat maintained developed advanced country malaysia

1. just need to get rid of kuffar rats sooner or later

2. increase muslim population
3. acquire strategic weapons.

good enough.


stats pumped out by some countries dun seem to match reality

 

[superpower]

Oh i see now, cpc pumpng in money/ budget for progpnd to counter cia budget





how the hell are chinks a superpower?

1. military ? no chance. 10 out of 10, tiongkoks are behind yanks in almost every arena. no invention to begin with just mere copy paste and poor copies at that. these morons cant even copy well just inferior mongoloids.


2. culture? tiongs got culture?

we've all heard abt, seen the chink tourists, don't talk about tiong culture.

3. engineering, science tech? zero. except copy paste, tiongkok got no invention in last 50 years. same as all other mongoloids btw. this is why japs have been stagnant for last 30 odd years and why stinkypura has only been a monye laundering and tax evasion hub nowadays. they all admit ang moh kia are superior, in that there is no doubt.

4. commercial success? sorry, no superpowerdom there. yankee dollar = global reserve currency (thanks soley due to their miltiary which tiongs have no chance of surpassing), which means yanks can print as many dollars as they like.

while tiongs have to slave away as sweatshop workers to earn dollars pritned by yanks.


5. anything else?


in fact tiongs are the biggest failure EVER in human history.

1. ONLY country in human hisotry which could not conquer subdue decimate pulverize destroy a SMALLER ceca country is tiongkok (under cpc).

fact.


2. tiongkok has failed, REPEATEDLY, to surpass a 4 times smaller country called the united states that comes from 10k to 12k km away.
this failure has NEVER been experienced by stinkypura in its entire history.

NEVER did stinkypura FAIL, AT ALL, against a 4 times smaller country whether the country came from afar or near. period.

1. True, if you're talking about conventional warfare. But in some areas, e.g. hypersonic missiles and drone technology, the Chinese have surged ahead. Just so, the number of nuclear warheads on both sides will mean Mutually Assurred Destruction. Anyway unlike the imperialist ways of the US (and the Brits before them), China has no interest in conquering faraway lands and converting them to their own ideology. They're obsessed about raising living standards, maintaining stability, guarding territorial integrity (avoiding the repeat of past humiliations like the ceding of Taiwan, HK and Macau). Because - that's the irony - there are no alternative parties, no elections: if the CCP fails to deliver, there will be massive riots, civil war even... and it will be like warlord era of the early post-Republican years.

2. 5,000 years of civilization. Need we say more? At the height of Tang culture, China was already the world's largest economy and Europe was still in the dark ages after the fall of the Roman Empire. Till the 1850, China was still the world's largest economy (India #2 before being run over by the Brits). What goes up must come down, and vice versa. That's the big lesson of history. Paper, gun powder, movable type, compass, porcelain, silk, tea, pasta, even skiing... in today's terms it would be intellectual property theft by the West. How does one even calculate the payable damages?

3. No longer true. A recent Aussie study finds that China is now leading the US in 37 out of 44 critical technology fields, including nanoscale tech and synthetic biology:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-race-in-all-but-a-few-fields-thinktank-finds

4. The Yanks have long had a free ride by getting off the gold standard (to finance the Vietnam War, which it lost miserably) and establishing a fiat currency regime in which it is not only the world's reserve currency, it is also the only country to be able to go heavily in debt by borrowing money in its own currency and determining its own monetary rates. But the writing is on the wall: the CIA bombing of the Nord Stream, weaponising the $ in sanctions against Russia and Iran, the fallout from the Ukraine War on Europe and Brics nations - all this has led to a steady de-dollarization push among many nations, including Brazil, Argentina, India, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Middle East. The reserve currency status will not be toppled soon, but it may not last past mid-century.

Throughout China's 5,000 year history, it has always been engaged in warfare with 'barbarian' nations to the north, south and west - a cycle of conquering and being conquered by its enemies (most notably the Mongols and the Manchus). Always defending its borders. Zero globalist ambition, hence the navel-gazing concept of the Middle Kingdom. Fast-forward to the 21st century: still obsessed about its borders, reclaiming lost territory, no interest in a hegemonic world order.

Some things don't change.

 

[syed putra]

China has no interest in conquering faraway lands and converting them to their own ideology. They're obsessed about raising living standards, maintaining stability, guarding territorial integrity (avoiding the repeat of past humiliations like the ceding of Taiwan, HK and Macau).

Tell that to tibetans, mongolians uighyrs and manchoos.

 

[superpower]

like this how to be superpower?

China's military rocket force uncovers 'shortcomings' - PLA Daily​

Fri, September 15, 2023 at 12:06 AM PDT

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinas-military-rocket-force-uncovers-070627949.html

Look at the long list of NASA and Soviet near-fatal and fatal incidents in the past 50 years. Didn't stop either from becoming superpowers locked in the Cold War.

To paraphrase GCT: If there's no shortcoming, I worry

 

[superpower]

Tell that to tibetans, mongolians uighyrs and manchoos.

Big difference between guarding your borders against neighbouring aggressors and going round the world in warships conquering native lands. If you studied Chinese history, you'd know that the Chinese were invaded much more often by their neighbours than vice versa. The nation grew in good times under strong rulers, and fragmented into lawless states under ineffectual ones. Border skirmishes were always a result of provocation by neighboring tribes. The ultimate humiliations were the subjugation of the entire nation under the Manchus and Mongols. BTW, the Hans never ventured into the northeast or north of the Gobi desert. It was the northern 'barbarians' who invaded southwards.

It is no wonder the Chinese have an insecurity complex about defining borders and preserving territorial integrity. How many nations look at history through a 5,000-year lens and count cycles in 200 year epochs, with each dynasty writing the history of the preceding one, painstakingly analyzing its victories and losses and shortcomings in dealing with natural disasters and famine and vowing to reclaim lost territory (fan qing fu ming - overthrow the Qing, revive the Ming)?

That China is painted by the Western media and powers to be a power-hungry hegemon bent on instituting a new world order through violent physical conquest is merely a projection of their Neanderthal 'nature red in tooth and claw' psyches. 500 years of European adventurism, colonisation and exploitation have resulted in 1/10th of the world's population subjugating the other 9/10th.

Christopher Columbus' small pirate boat vs Zheng He gigantic junk: that's the difference in a nutshell. One resulted in the 'discovery' and conquest and exploitation of the New World, the other fostered trade along the Maritime Silk Road.

 

[superpower]

it has surpassed them a few years ago if you count ppp.

problem is then ceca gdp looks much closer to tiongs' and tiongs dun like this idea.

they'd much rather be behind yanks but lead ceca by a considerable margin than be world leaders.

talk abt shooting their own foot.

GDP matters little.

E.g. indon.

fact thta both tiongs and yanks keep talking up either GDP or manufacturing tells us they are both utterly incapable countries.

yes it's true.

this is why it's also incredible that these bunch of morons can't be surpassed by current lot of muslims.

i mean for God's sake, why is that there is not a single Muslim country which has n't tested nukes and icbm in public? anti satellite missiles in public? while ceca have? while norkies have done 2 of 3?

we are talking of 76 IQ ceca and 25 million norkies?

so there are no muslim countries with bigger popn than norkies?

how come not a single one of the loud mouth braggarts like iran turkey pakis have tested nukes icbm and anti satellite missiles?

Pakistan is one of the nine official states possessing nuclear weapons. Detonated 5 devices in 1998. Iran is probably the next Muslim state to join the club.

So what? Nuclear weapons don't make you a superpower, they don't put bread on the table, a shelter over your heads. By your admission, nuclear-armed North Korea is just a 'statelet' - non-nuclear South Korea's GDP is 57x the North's.

Nuclear states understand this: nuclear weapons are just a deterrent, a geopolitical bargaining chip, nothing more. Use them and both you and your enemies will be annihilated completely.

 

[superpower]

 

[syed putra]

Big difference between guarding your borders against neighbouring aggressors and going round the world in warships conquering native lands. If you studied Chinese history, you'd know that the Chinese were invaded much more often by their neighbours than vice versa. The nation grew in good times under strong rulers, and fragmented into lawless states under ineffectual ones. Border skirmishes were always a result of provocation by neighboring tribes. The ultimate humiliations were the subjugation of the entire nation under the Manchus and Mongols. BTW, the Hans never ventured into the northeast or north of the Gobi desert. It was the northern 'barbarians' who invaded southwards.

It is no wonder the Chinese have an insecurity complex about defining borders and preserving territorial integrity. How many nations look at history through a 5,000-year lens and count cycles in 200 year epochs, with each dynasty writing the history of the preceding one, painstakingly analyzing its victories and losses and shortcomings in dealing with natural disasters and famine and vowing to reclaim lost territory (fan qing fu ming - overthrow the Qing, revive the Ming)?

That China is painted by the Western media and powers to be a power-hungry hegemon bent on instituting a new world order through violent physical conquest is merely a projection of their Neanderthal 'nature red in tooth and claw' psyches. 500 years of European adventurism, colonisation and exploitation have resulted in 1/10th of the world's population subjugating the other 9/10th.

Christopher Columbus' small pirate boat vs Zheng He gigantic junk: that's the difference in a nutshell. One resulted in the 'discovery' and conquest and exploitation of the New World, the other fostered trade along the Maritime Silk Road.

Under tang dynasty China army was beaten back by khwarezm Muslim forces otherwise they would have expanded westward.

 

[superpower]

Under tang dynasty China army was beaten back by khwarezm Muslim forces otherwise they would have expanded westward.

The expansion westward was (1) to basically to control the trade routes that crossed the Tarim basin, (2) to capture and subdue the Turks who were always staging incursions on its western borders. All Chinese Emperors value stability above all - any border war or unrest is a threat to their reign.

 

[duluxe]

This forum needs some balance la.

Monikers like duluxe, ChinaCommunistSG and eatshitndie posting un-rebutted anti-China drivel on a daily basis actually makes one wonder if this forum isn't sponsored by the CIA.

@superpower your CCP master's new 10 dash line, the lanjiao enlarged so long you call there raise in peace? It's bullying small countries.