More twists to the MRT depot tale !
<TABLE id=msgUN border=0 cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top>
Coffeeshop Chit Chat -
More twists to the MRT depot tale !</TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead vAlign=top><TD class=msgF width="1%" noWrap align=right>From: </TD><TD class=msgFname width="68%" noWrap>
kojakbt_89 <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate width="30%" noWrap align=right>Jun-4 9:22 pm </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT height=20 width="1%" noWrap align=right>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname width="68%" noWrap>
ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 20) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft rowSpan=4 width="1%"> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>
34123.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>
Jun 5, 2010
More twists to the MRT depot tale
<!-- by line -->By Maria Almenoar, Sujin Thomas & Teh Joo Lin
http://www.straitstimes.com/PrimeNews/Story/STIStory_535891.html
THE tale of the security breach at an MRT depot here took several twists yesterday:
Police were told of it only two days after it occurred, and the Swiss national who left his mark on a train might not have been working alone.
In a statement last night, police said the breach took place on the night of May 16 or early the next morning.
It added that police were informed only on May 19, at 7.15pm.
The Straits Times reported yesterday that a YouTube video of the incident was posted online on May 18.
That timeline of events meant the graffiti on the train, and the breach, went unnoticed for close to 48 hours.
In its statement yesterday, police said the 33-year-old Swiss national who was arrested on May 25 will be hauled to court today to face charges of vandalism and trespass.
It did not say why there was a time lapse between the breach and the police report.
Train operator SMRT was just as mum about what happened at its depot, which is surrounded by a chain-linked fence topped with barbed wire.
However, in a statement, it said: 'SMRT reported the breach to the police immediately when it was discovered.'
Replying to queries, its head of security, Mr Choy Kin Chong, would say only that more security staff had been deployed to increase patrols at its depots. It was also working with the authorities to install more surveillance and detection systems at the perimeters, he added.
Meanwhile, The Straits Times understands that a Briton might also have been involved in spray-painting the graffiti on the train. However, he might have left the country already.
News of the breach, reported in The Straits Times yesterday, has alarmed politicians and members of the public, who called for a review of security measures surrounding Singapore's public transport system.
SMRT has three other depots in Bishan, Ulu Pandan and Kim Chuan.
The other train operator, SBS Transit, has a train depot in Sengkang.
An ST check of SMRT's Changi depot, sitting opposite the Singapore Expo, showed two sections of fence that seemed to have been tampered with, along Xilin Avenue and Laguna Golf Green.
It now appears that the train had pulled out of the depot and ran for two days in full view of commuters.
The spray-painted graffiti bore the signature 'McKoy Banos', that of two 'artists' who have left their mark on trains around the world.
Banos, whose real identity is unknown, is notorious among graffiti enthusiasts for his designs and endorsement of Ironlak, a brand of spray paint. Believed to be a Briton, he also uses signature colours for his graffiti. A check of a website where his graffiti is displayed showed that they matched those found on the Singapore MRT train.
Yesterday, Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) chairmen urged SMRT to give a full account of how the breach happened.
GPC chairman for Home Affairs and Law, Mr Alvin Yeo, said: 'MRT trains are potential soft targets. I dare say that the suspects probably did it in the spirit of fun and adventure and not for something more sinister.
'But this could have been something more harmful than just graffiti.'
Agreeing, GPC chairman for Transport, Dr Lim Wee Kiak, referred to the ST report that the vandals would have to be at the depot for at least 20 minutes to do their paint job.
'They could have tampered with the train's brakes, taken ball-bearings out and compromised the safety of the train without anyone knowing,' he said.
He described the breach as a 'wake-up call'. It was an opportunity, he said, to review the security procedures for 'not only trains, but also other public transport like our buses'.
Mr Tan Chong Kuan, 46, a security expert with knowledge of the transport field, noted that while attention has been paid to securing train stations and trains on the move, 'the source of the threat can actually come from the depot itself'.
Mr Tan, who has 20 years' experience in security, asked: 'What if terrorists had entered the depot to plant a bomb inside the train or on its undercarriage, and they time it to explode, say, at 7.30am, when the train is packed?'
A spokesman for the Swiss embassy said yesterday that it was providing consular help to the Swiss citizen. He added that Swiss nationals living or vacationing in Singapore are subject to the laws and rules here.
If convicted of vandalism, the Swiss national faces a maximum punishment of up to three years' jail or fine of up to $2,000 and caning of no less than three strokes and up to eight strokes.
For trespassing into a protected place, he faces a maximum fine of $1,000 and two years' jail.
</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>