i see a similarity between armstrong fans & con hee fans.
You can count me out of that category. I happen to think that Lanstrong is a cheat, a liar a bully and an egomaniac whereas Con Hee fans think he's a saint.
However, to go after just one drug cheat just because he has the highest profile smells very much like a hatchet job rather than the quest for truth and justice.
Cycling has been riddled with dope from day one. Tommy Simpson died at the top of Mont Ventoux because he was doped to the eyeballs with amphetamine which was the drug of the era before EPO and they erected a monument to honor the moment and location where he collapsed.
And if anyone tells thinks that Indurain won the tour clean from 1991 to 1995, they must be living in a different dimension.
The winner in 1996 has already confessed to doping.
The winner in 1997 was Jan Ullrich. Clean? Yeah right!
The winner in 1998 was Marco Pantani. Clean? You have to be kidding.
We all know what happened in 2006.
The 2007 and 2009 tour was won by Contador. Clean? This is the guy who tried to blame his failed drug test on a piece of steak.
So why is only the Lance Era expunged from the history books?