AMP versus People's Association

[myfoot123]

By PAP logic, those partisan establisments should not get funding.

People's association has received numerous fundings for being partisan. What is the different between AMP not getting funding for being partsian (unclear) and PA receiving 200% support in funding (with well know partisan agenda)



AMP vs PA (former threatened with no funding and latter got 44mil to rebuild RCs)

Leslie chew vs Amy cheong (the latter allowed to leave Singapore unscathed whereas the former got his passport held and interrogated for 3 days by CPIB)

SMRT vs PRC driver (the former got warning and latter got weeks of imprisonment)

NTUC vs Singaporean workers (the former only interested in running supermart for profit while the latter's salary were depressed for years with no proper representation, now MOM has to take the rap that NTUC labour union is not capable of doing for its members)

The list goes on...(please add..)

 

[laksaboy]

They are all running dog subsidiary organizations of the PAP. AMP is for the Melayu running dogs.

There are also various trade/commerce organizations and Chinese clan associations which are the running dog proxy organizations of the PAP.

 

[myfoot123]

Till now, the secret ministers still dare not come out to admit they forced Nizam to quit. The longer the secret holds, the worse image PAP is going to suffer. Let's see how long these mysterious MPs will hide.

 

[myfoot123]

President of Marauh wrote to Shit Times forum criticising PAP for its double-standard. She said many PAP ministers also head VWO and NGO and still received funding. By depriving AMP, PAP is playing up partisan card and not Nizam. She cut straight into PAP wound. I wonder which standard template will PAP use to bombard her?