Serious AMDK Lost Everything After Retiring to Thailand!

Hard to say, there are too many doubtful things happened.

It could be a case of a dirty gov or dirty savage or both.

According to savage, the polis tricked him into signing bogus doc.
Why would polis want to do that?

Why would a dispute with neighbour over a driveway in 2010 turned ugly until this stage?

Why would their property be flipped until becum worthless, without the law involved?
You alleged they were cheated by Government or you believe they were cheated by Government.

I told you the property has nothing to do with the Government. The police made them sign a "bogus document" was a separate incident in 2017, even if it was true.

You should not use mix that incident with the property loss.
 
@sbfuncle

I will come to your question later. To be able to piece together everything, we need to understand the background from the limited information we have given. Take a close look at this family photo, and tell me apart from the AMDK, which one resembles an AMDK ?
View attachment 227425
My guess from pix is that the left standing one is the Thai-British wife and bottom right their british-thai daughter.
 
The 2nd Fairy Head

The 40-unit apartment complex was worth 1.2 million pounds. That is equivalent to 52 million baht ! And the wife being the sole legal owner of the apartment complex in Pattaya could have walked into any bank in Pattaya, and she would be treated like a queen. Instead, she chose a private moneylender.

This is where the family photo is important.

If you prefer to borrow money from a private moneylender than the established banks in your country, then obviously you know the private moneylender personally. God knows what kind of the documents they signed and what conditions they agreed that would eventually allow the private moneylender to foreclose the apartment complex.

Up to now, whether it's the boundary dispute with the neighbour or the loan arrangements with the private moneylender, these are civil matters that will NOT involve the police. The incident in 2017 must have pertained to a criminal matter. The police do NOT have the power to impose a jail term. Only the Court has the power. The police could only detain them for 48 hours, after which further extensions will have to be approved by the Court. Each extension is 7 days up to a maximum of 84 days, which figure is close to the story that they were jailed for 3 months. And that is to say, every extension of 7 days sought by the police, the couple would be given a chance to be heard in Court.

With the Court also involved every 7 days, the police cannot suka suka make them sign a document and jail them for 3 months. The police simple do NOT have the power !

Back to the family photo. None except the AMDK himself is of AMDK descent. The wife who is 66 is one year older than the AMDK. That is to say, when the AMDK fell lub lub with the Thai bu, she already had a family with a Thai jerk.

Did AMDK check if the private moneylender or the so-called "buyer in good faith" who eventually bought the 40-unit apartment complex is the Thai jerk himself or related to the Thai jerk?

The 40-unit apartment complex is the real deal - the goose that lays the golden eggs.

You want to know why the private moneylender was allowed to "flip" the goose? The AMDK had been sold out by his own lawyer.
 
The 2nd Fairy Head

The 40-unit apartment complex was worth 1.2 million pounds. That is equivalent to 52 million baht ! And the wife being the sole legal owner of the apartment complex in Pattaya could have walked into any bank in Pattaya, and she would be treated like a queen. Instead, she chose a private moneylender.

This is where the family photo is important.

If you prefer to borrow money from a private moneylender than the established banks in your country, then obviously you know the private moneylender personally. God knows what kind of the documents they signed and what conditions they agreed that would eventually allow the private moneylender to foreclose the apartment complex.

Up to now, whether it's the boundary dispute with the neighbour or the loan arrangements with the private moneylender, these are civil matters that will NOT involve the police. The incident in 2017 must have pertained to a criminal matter. The police do NOT have the power to impose a jail term. Only the Court has the power. The police could only detain them for 48 hours, after which further extensions will have to be approved by the Court. Each extension is 7 days up to a maximum of 84 days, which figure is close to the story that they were jailed for 3 months. And that is to say, every extension of 7 days sought by the police, the couple would be given a chance to be heard in Court.

With the Court also involved every 7 days, the police cannot suka suka make them sign a document and jail them for 3 months. The police simple do NOT have the power !

Back to the family photo. None except the AMDK himself is of AMDK descent. The wife who is 66 is one year older than the AMDK. That is to say, when the AMDK fell lub lub with the Thai bu, she already had a family with a Thai jerk.

Did AMDK check if the private moneylender or the so-called "buyer in good faith" who eventually bought the 40-unit apartment complex is the Thai jerk himself or related to the Thai jerk?

The 40-unit apartment complex is the real deal - the goose that lays the golden eggs.

You want to know why the private moneylender was allowed to "flip" the goose? The AMDK had been sold out by his own lawyer.

The actors/actress:

1. the wife
2. the moneylender
3. the buyer
4. the wife's lawyer

and possibly, 5, the neighbor who created the need for a lawsuit.

The director - the Thai jerk who was the ex-husband who 臥薪嘗膽 for 20 years.

The AMDK had an ego boosting experience when the Thai lady "fell for him". Every man craves for a moment of Brad Pitt, especially if in your entire life no one had ever praised you for being handsome. He had been Brad Pitt for 20 years. Thai ladies are very good at giving you that feeling - that you are the knight in shining armor who is going to deliver her family from poverty. That good feeling of lub lub is NOT free. :rolleyes:
 
In Thailand, u need to act like a poor 路蛇in order to enjoy your leetirement…cannot wealth show off that can attracted plying eyes esp Locals

U only deal with authorised Professional Bankers to manage your wealth
 
The AMDK had an ego boosting experience when the Thai lady "fell for him". Every man craves for a moment of Brad Pitt, especially if in your entire life no one had ever praised you for being handsome. He had been Brad Pitt for 20 years. Thai ladies are very good at giving you that feeling - that you are the knight in shining armor who is going to deliver her family from poverty. That good feeling of lub lub is NOT free. :rolleyes:
Another factor that @Boonsiong will confirm - Thai ladies give the best blowjobs ! :cool:
 
You alleged they were cheated by Government or you believe they were cheated by Government.

I told you the property has nothing to do with the Government. The police made them sign a "bogus document" was a separate incident in 2017, even if it was true.

You should not use mix that incident with the property loss.
I believe the gov has a role in played with those incidents. Both for the property and the arrest, and the jail.

What makes me into believing that.

1.When they fought in court in 2017, for the property thing, why they were arrested?

2. They made them signed a bogus doc, I believe it was to plead guilty to something.
 
The actors/actress:

1. the wife
2. the moneylender
3. the buyer
4. the wife's lawyer

and possibly, 5, the neighbor who created the need for a lawsuit.

The director - the Thai jerk who was the ex-husband who 臥薪嘗膽 for 20 years.


The AMDK had an ego boosting experience when the Thai lady "fell for him". Every man craves for a moment of Brad Pitt, especially if in your entire life no one had ever praised you for being handsome. He had been Brad Pitt for 20 years. Thai ladies are very good at giving you that feeling - that you are the knight in shining armor who is going to deliver her family from poverty. That good feeling of lub lub is NOT free. :rolleyes:
But why would the wife go to jail?
A staged one and never went to jail?
 
The actors/actress:

1. the wife
2. the moneylender
3. the buyer
4. the wife's lawyer

and possibly, 5, the neighbor who created the need for a lawsuit.

The director - the Thai jerk who was the ex-husband who 臥薪嘗膽 for 20 years.


The AMDK had an ego boosting experience when the Thai lady "fell for him". Every man craves for a moment of Brad Pitt, especially if in your entire life no one had ever praised you for being handsome. He had been Brad Pitt for 20 years. Thai ladies are very good at giving you that feeling - that you are the knight in shining armor who is going to deliver her family from poverty. That good feeling of lub lub is NOT free. :rolleyes:
I have to repeat again, women-free life is the best.

Thailand is great for food, relax chilled and shopping. Plus enjoy their modernised made up culture in the modern bangkok city.

i dunno but i love checking out their meat free cafe, eateries and restaurants. The people who frequent there are religious, spiritual, moral and health practitioners at all levels. i dun encounter such women-enticing situation at all after interacting with Thai ladies partly as i am very selective in who i talk to, maybe my frequency isn't compatible to these low frequency energy.
 
Last edited:
Cannot run when u are involved with local
Don't know the language and invested big money is ter nao lor.

You see gansiokbin, dare to buy multiple mudland properties de woh.
She is a half mudlander, proficient in m&d language too or else she wouldn't dare to do this.
 
I believe the gov has a role in played with those incidents. Both for the property and the arrest, and the jail.

What makes me into believing that.

1.When they fought in court in 2017, for the property thing, why they were arrested?

2. They made them signed a bogus doc, I believe it was to plead guilty to something.
You didn't read what I said.

The court case in 2017 had nothing to do with the property. I have said that the boundary dispute and the loan arrangements are strictly CIVIL matters and do NOT involve the police. Did you miss this post ?

Screenshot_1.jpg
 
Don't know the language and invested big money is ter nao lor.

You see gansiokbin, dare to buy multiple mudland properties de woh.
She is a half mudlander, proficient in m&d language too or else she wouldn't dare to do this.

LCB’ parents are from mudland .. she must learn to be filial to her mother :unsure:

Without her mother .. there won’t be her running around screaming & yelling at people :rolleyes:
 
Do you know the nature of the detention ?

I have told you it's a criminal matter and it has nothing to do with the property.
I had also wondered what was the caused of the detention.
The news only mentioned, after the lender flipped the property to becum worthless, they brought it to court.

Then suddenly polis made them signed bogus doc and had been arrested.

What did the court did the them afterwards was not mentioned.
 
I had also wondered what was the caused of the detention.
The news only mentioned, after the lender flipped the property to becum worthless, they brought it to court.

Then suddenly polis made them signed bogus doc and had been arrested.

What did the court did the them afterwards was not mentioned.
How many times must I tell you the jail issue relates to a separate matter in 2017.

By 2011 the property matter was over !
 
How many times must I tell you the jail issue relates to a separate matter in 2017.

By 2011 the property matter was over !
Oh like that.

If the arrest and the property were separate matter, then I will think why the wife also had to live with him in poverty, if she was part of the grand con scheme.

She would have run away.
Then later she wouldn't been arrested together le.
 
Back
Top