A win for Iris koh

I have already said that in the context of trial within a trial, the Dr's lawyer did NOT challenge the statements because he thought it was untrue. I'm not saying that "because he thought it was untrue, that's why he challenged."

In other words, the Dr's lawyer wasn't interested in whether the statements were true or untrue. It's was the procedure of obtaining evidence that he felt was unfair, and it was the unfairness he was challenging.
I have to state I'm not asking something pertaining to this particular hearing.
Sorlee if I had misled you.

I'm back tracking to the orleeginal case I.e during the time when moh sued the loctor.
 
I have to state I'm not asking something pertaining to this particular hearing.
Sorlee if I had misled you.

I'm back tracking to the orleeginal case I.e during the time when moh sued the loctor.

I do NOT know the defence of the Dr. You are assuming that the Dr.'s defence is he did not inject saline, but the real vaccine.

From the statements he made to the police which were revealed during the trial within a trial, it did not appear to me that the Dr. had denied he injected saline.
 
I do NOT know the defence of the Dr. You are assuming that the Dr.'s defence is he did not inject saline, but the real vaccine.

From the statements he made to the police which were revealed during the trial within a trial, it did not appear to me that the Dr. had denied he injected saline.
Oic. If that's the case, then loctor jialat lo.
But I'm still wondering why moh did not leequested for court to orlar a mandatorlee blood test for those patients involved before proceeding the charges.
Unless they already had concrete evidence without any test.
 
Oic. If that's the case, then loctor jialat lo.
But I'm still wondering why moh did not leequested for court to orlar a mandatorlee blood test for those patients involved before proceeding the charges.
Unless they already had concrete evidence without any test.
He admitted they were saline what. So test kumlan ah ?

Screenshot_1.jpg


This is why I said I don't know his defense.
 
No. They paotoh the Dr and are now prosecution's witnesses.
This is a real sinful world.
The prosecutor might think that they are doing their job, upholding the law and justice .
And just becos they want to achieve their objective, they can let go the patients side of their offences.

If the patient had just leequested for saline jab, and loctor leejected it. It is not yet a offence committed. But after getting the fake jab, they proceeded to cheat the authorities by showing a fake cert.
This is a offence.

I see a utter bullshit law holding society we are living in .
It simply means certain law can close eyes while certain cannot.
Then I will beat them to puppy , by asking eg is littering, or illeegal parking or possessing vape etc more serious offence than cheating the gov orlar?
If not, why you cannot let go those people while you can exchange it by getting them to be witnesses.

Then I will issue a Pui.
 

Gazy said moh has no power to lock up loctor for more than 24 hours.
So maybe he can sue moh.
When the Suing will ever end?

Moh orfid got cell to lock people mare?
 
For this couple, no country will take them in by the name of political asylum.

Furthermore Raymond case is not related to vaccination.

Raymond case is CBT , criminal breach of trust.

In 南大 Chinese, this is call 刑事失信案

要坐牢的
Can apply for JAH.
 
View attachment 225479
Gazy said moh has no power to lock up loctor for more than 24 hours.
So maybe he can sue moh.
When the Suing will ever end?

Moh orfid got cell to lock people mare?
With leegards to this earlier beedio.

I think gazy misused the word 'lockup'
I don't think moh orfid has any cell to lockup anyone.
It should be an interrogation session that lasted 24hrs.
As such, I doubt he can sue moh.
 
Oic. If that's the case, then loctor jialat lo.
But I'm still wondering why moh did not leequested for court to orlar a mandatorlee blood test for those patients involved before proceeding the charges.
Unless they already had concrete evidence without any test.
It's not a blood test, but a serology test.

None of the patients were tested, even though a handful of them offered to be tested. That is to say, the prosecution proceeded on the evidence of an admission by Dr Jipson. Apparently, Dr Jipson "tio hung" by the police and blurted everything out. This is why his lawyer challenged the admissibility of the [incriminating] statements that were made to the police.
 
It's not a blood test, but a serology test.

None of the patients were tested, even though a handful of them offered to be tested. That is to say, the prosecution proceeded on the evidence of an admission by Dr Jipson. Apparently, Dr Jipson "tio hung" by the police and blurted everything out. This is why his lawyer challenged the admissibility of the [incriminating] statements that were made to the police.
Why is it an offer and not a enforcement test? They are also considered as law offenders de woh.
 
Why is it an offer and not a enforcement test? They are also considered as law offenders de woh.
We do not know the interval between the date of vaccination versus the date they were paotoh and eventually hauled to Cantonment Complex. The effect of the vaccine could have faded and the test would not be conclusive that they were injected with saline. If the patients had natural antibodies at the time of test, then it would be game over for the prosecution from the start. They would have missed a great opportunity to kill a chicken to scare the monkeys.

Moreover, if you want to take samples from the body of someone, consent is normally required. Unlike a situation where the accused is believed to have taken a banned substance, and a test would reveal if he had taken the banned substance, in this case the accused is believed to have NOT taken a "legal" substance.
 
Last edited:
We do not know the interval between the date of vaccination versus the date they were paotoh and eventually hauled to Cantonment Complex. The effect of the vaccine could have faded and the test would not be conclusive that they were injected with saline. If the patients had natural antibodies at the time of test, then it would be game over for the prosecution from the start. They would have missed a great opportunity to kill a chicken to scare the monkeys.

Moreover, if you want to take samples from the body of someone, consent is normally required. Unlike a situation where the accused is believed to have taken a banned substance, and a test would reveal if he had taken the banned substance, in this case the accused is believed to have NOT taken a "legal" substance.
If loctor wasn't tio hung and admitted to it, prosecutor may have problems pressing the charges.
Gazy and iris should have been quicker enough to Leemind and physcho him on this.
They are very good with these sort of 小动作
 
Back
Top