A win for Iris koh

[sbfuncle]

I have already said that in the context of trial within a trial, the Dr's lawyer did NOT challenge the statements because he thought it was untrue. I'm not saying that "because he thought it was untrue, that's why he challenged."

In other words, the Dr's lawyer wasn't interested in whether the statements were true or untrue. It's was the procedure of obtaining evidence that he felt was unfair, and it was the unfairness he was challenging.

I have to state I'm not asking something pertaining to this particular hearing.
Sorlee if I had misled you.

I'm back tracking to the orleeginal case I.e during the time when moh sued the loctor.

 

[NanoSpeed]

I have to state I'm not asking something pertaining to this particular hearing.
Sorlee if I had misled you.

I'm back tracking to the orleeginal case I.e during the time when moh sued the loctor.

I do NOT know the defence of the Dr. You are assuming that the Dr.'s defence is he did not inject saline, but the real vaccine.

From the statements he made to the police which were revealed during the trial within a trial, it did not appear to me that the Dr. had denied he injected saline.

 

[sbfuncle]

I do NOT know the defence of the Dr. You are assuming that the Dr.'s defence is he did not inject saline, but the real vaccine.

From the statements he made to the police which were revealed during the trial within a trial, it did not appear to me that the Dr. had denied he injected saline.

Oic. If that's the case, then loctor jialat lo.
But I'm still wondering why moh did not leequested for court to orlar a mandatorlee blood test for those patients involved before proceeding the charges.
Unless they already had concrete evidence without any test.

 

[NanoSpeed]

Oic. If that's the case, then loctor jialat lo.
But I'm still wondering why moh did not leequested for court to orlar a mandatorlee blood test for those patients involved before proceeding the charges.
Unless they already had concrete evidence without any test.

He admitted they were saline what. So test kumlan ah ?

This is why I said I don't know his defense.

 

[sbfuncle]

He admitted they were saline what. So test kumlan ah ?

View attachment 225433

This is why I said I don't know his defense.

In this case, any idea, were all those patients involved each leeceived a charges?
It is also a serious offence on the patient end de woh.

 

[NanoSpeed]

In this case, any idea, were all those patients involved each leeceived a charges?
It is also a serious offence on the patient end de woh.

No. They paotoh the Dr and are now prosecution's witnesses.

 

[sbfuncle]

No. They paotoh the Dr and are now prosecution's witnesses.

This is a real sinful world.
The prosecutor might think that they are doing their job, upholding the law and justice .
And just becos they want to achieve their objective, they can let go the patients side of their offences.

If the patient had just leequested for saline jab, and loctor leejected it. It is not yet a offence committed. But after getting the fake jab, they proceeded to cheat the authorities by showing a fake cert.
This is a offence.

I see a utter bullshit law holding society we are living in .
It simply means certain law can close eyes while certain cannot.
Then I will beat them to puppy , by asking eg is littering, or illeegal parking or possessing vape etc more serious offence than cheating the gov orlar?
If not, why you cannot let go those people while you can exchange it by getting them to be witnesses.

Then I will issue a Pui.