A win for Iris koh

[sbfuncle]

I read carefully, and for your ease of understanding, I'm restricting the charge to just cheating.

So now it's your turn to read carefully.

Then swee lor.
I can rest my case now. Phew.
As I had already mentioned earlier - unless his civil suit against lice media was more than just accusing him of cheating.

 

[sbfuncle]

Yes.

Sorlee if it is yes.
Then I cannot rest my case de woh.

May I ask, why the court need to allow him to lodge a civil case to sue lice media?
Becos it is a separate matter, right, becos is a civil suit.

We go step by step using Q&A OK?

 

[Hightech88]

 

[sbfuncle]

Sorlee if it is yes.
Then I cannot rest my case de woh.

May I ask, why the court need to allow him to lodge a civil case to sue lice media?
Becos it is a separate matter, right, becos is a civil suit.

We go step by step using Q&A OK?

@NanoSpeed

I do a self Q&A now. Can you help fill in the blank ?

Q1. May I ask, why the court need to allow him to lodge a civil case to sue lice media?
Ans : Becos it is a separate matter, right, becos is a civil suit.

Q2. Was the criminal case for pp to charge rn is for cheating?
Ans : Yes

Q3. Was the civil suit about rn suing lice media for defaming him of cheating
Ans : Yes

Q4. May I know what else is possible for rn or his AI lawyer to challenge in court if his criminal case is found guilty?
Ans : pls fill in the blank, if you know.
Eg, lice media said I'm a siao lang etc

Thank you.

 

[Geneco]

I must say that the level of planning to do the mRNA scam is much more meticulous than the false flag planning and execution of 9/11.

there's a good reason why god of "science" FAUCI needs to be pardoned from 2014

 

[Geneco]

This is an eventful week, I have also applied to Court intended to have full acquittal. I am simplifying the terms, so that normal readers can understand (while not prejudging the matter).

Firstly, I am innocent of the cheating charges, and I did not DO anything remotely close to what was accused.

In the last hearing, even the Prosecutor admits to the Court that 1 of the key elements (the "person" who received the cheated money) is wrong, and they are in the process of reviewing the evidence so as to eventually change the name of the "person" receiving the cheated money.

This is not a small error, the error if unchanged, the Prosecutor truly has to discharge me.

The irony is, if Prosecutor changes, Court has to approve basing on their evaluation criteria, and Court may NOT approve, subject to what I am representing to the Court, as in the amendment cannot be done because of some principle in law.

If they do not change, then they would be forced to discharge. If their application to amend is disapproved, then they would have to discharge as well.

If somehow the Court approves the amendment, the High Court can review it and might deny the amendment.

The problem now is, putting aside the "person", the actual alleged cheating of "co sharing of vending machine" in my view, has not a single piece of documentary evidence (and the documents I submit is over thousands of pages), but that one I will not prejudge, and I will leave it to the Court.

Thanks, updates as they come.

View attachment 224086

need some advice who ish SURE notch happy about this lololololol...