• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

38% grads can’t find job within 1 year of layoff

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=2]38% grads can’t find job within 1 year of layoff[/h]
dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
PostDateIcon.png
June 2nd, 2014 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Editorial


Singaporean-workers-300x198.jpg
According to MOM statistics released last month, only 62% of degree holders are able to find a new job within 12 months of losing their job last year [Link].

That means, 38% of them can’t find a job within 1 year after they are laid off.


This is compared to the next lowest rate of 65% for workers with polytechnic diplomas and professional qualifications, and the highest of 71% for those with secondary qualifications.

Degree holders have had the lowest rate of finding new job after being laid off, since 2011.


Also since 2011, degree holders being made redundant was also disproportionately higher than other qualification groups. Last year, degree holders made up 39% of workers who were laid off.

Experts suggested three reasons for this:



  • jobs lost in restructuring tending to be held by graduates
  • greater demand for non-academic skills, and
  • substitution by “skilled foreign labour”


IT project manager Sylvia Tan, 51, lost her job of 29 years when her business unit was cut earlier this year due to restructuring.

“If I had been able to pick up new skills like cloud computing and analytics, maybe they would have retained me,” the computer science graduate said. “But they probably prefer to pay a younger person with less experience and newer skills.”

She found a similar role at a new company within a month, but only because she took a pay cut of 43%.

Many affected Singaporean workers are blaming the over-liberal “foreign talent” policy instituted by the government. In fact, with more “skilled foreign labour” being hired, it exacerbates the problem because the “skilled foreign labour” will tend to hire other “skilled foreign labour”, discriminating the Singaporean workers further.

A survey conducted by recruitment firm eFinancialCareers last year confirmed that a large number of companies in the finance industry are discriminating against Singaporean hires. According to the survey, a majority or 52% of the respondents said their companies had favored foreigners for some job openings (‘Survey confirms rampant job discrimination against SGs‘).

In fact, the situation was so bad that 2 Cabinet Ministers had to have a “friendly talk” with senior members of the financial industry.

Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin told Parliament in March last year that he and Finance Minister Tharman met senior members of the financial industry to urge them to develop a local talent pipeline. Mr Tan said, without going into specifics, that there had been complaints of foreign managers preferring to hire their own countrymen and his ministry was investigating the matter.

In view of complaints made by Singaporeans, MOM will be putting in place the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF) for getting the companies to consider hiring Singaporean workers first.

The FCF which will come into effect this August, requires that all positions paying less than $12,000 a month be advertised on a WDA jobs bank for 2 weeks before a foreign candidate can be hired.

The US, Britain and Australia all have similar skilled foreign workforce policies in place to prevent discrimination against their locals.

It remains to be seen how effective the FCF will be since there is no guarantee that a company will hire a Singaporean even after advertising on the WDA jobs bank. The company can easily discard all the Singaporean resumes after 2 weeks citing unsuitability and continue to hire the “preferred” foreign candidate.
 

SadPlumpGal

Alfrescian
Loyal
The job market is very dynamic. What is this about always wanting to have salary higher than last drawn pay even when your skills sets have become obsolete?

When I was working in a real estate agency as an administrator, I saw lots of people with dubious paper qualifications thinking the world of themselves.

This was partly due to all the brainwashing sales seminars that they attended to boost their ego, because they have little else.

8 out of 10 can't even complete a simple English sentence.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The job market is very dynamic. What is this about always wanting to have salary higher than last drawn pay even when your skills sets have become obsolete?

When I was working in a real estate agency as an administrator, I saw lots of people with dubious paper qualifications thinking the world of themselves.

This was partly due to all the brainwashing sales seminars that they attended to boost their ego, because they have little else.

8 out of 10 can't even complete a simple English sentence.

what types of paper qualifications are dubious?let me know so i can avoid them.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The 60% has voted for people, who let in these foreigners, who smash their rice bowls & their children & relatives too.
 

dr.wailing

Alfrescian
Loyal
what types of paper qualifications are dubious?let me know so i can avoid them.

Well, if you have paper qualifications from the following institutions:

1. NUS
2. NTU
3. SMU
4. LKY School of ........
5. S. Raja school of ......

Most of the so-called "experts" employed by the above are not really experts at all.

About 40% of the students in the above institutions are from non-English speaking countries who can't even write a whole term paper in English. They pay ghost writers to write for them. Do you think these students deserve to be awarded with degrees?
 

wMulew

Alfrescian
Loyal
The 60% has voted for people, who let in these foreigners, who smash their rice bowls & their children & relatives too.

Dumbfuck opposition supporting retard always blaming the govt. Look at this, these are the kind of loser "graduate" whose degree have long since become obsolete. Even if there are no foreigners, employer wont hire them.

IT project manager Sylvia Tan, 51, lost her job of 29 years when her business unit was cut earlier this year due to restructuring.

“If I had been able to pick up new skills like cloud computing and analytics, maybe they would have retained me,” the computer science graduate said. “But they probably prefer to pay a younger person with less experience and newer skills.”
 

dr.wailing

Alfrescian
Loyal
......Look at this, these are the kind of loser "graduate" whose degree have long since become obsolete. Even if there are no foreigners, employer wont hire them.

I totally agree with you, wMulew.

The PAP government should not even waste its precious time and resources to help such people. LHL should, through Amy Khor, tell such people to move out of Sinkapore or become toilet cleaners, hawker centre cleaners, road sweepers, etc...
 

meepokboy

Alfrescian
Loyal
now times are hard. and competitive. graduates cannot even find job after they are out from school.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Dumbfuck opposition supporting retard always blaming the govt. Look at this, these are the kind of loser "graduate" whose degree have long since become obsolete. Even if there are no foreigners, employer wont hire them.

Have you lost your jobs to foreigners...wtf??!!! blame the government...who in the fuck place, let in these people since 1984?? I think you were not born yet & may not even have hairs down there...
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I totally agree with you, wMulew.

The PAP government should not even waste its precious time and resources to help such people. LHL should, through Amy Khor, tell such people to move out of Sinkapore or become toilet cleaners, hawker centre cleaners, road sweepers, etc...

Who produces such graduates?? from a vending machine?? from Min of Edn school system.....in any other country such person making such remarks would have shoes thrown at her...
 

da dick

Alfrescian
Loyal
The job market is very dynamic. What is this about always wanting to have salary higher than last drawn pay even when your skills sets have become obsolete?

When I was working in a real estate agency as an administrator, I saw lots of people with dubious paper qualifications thinking the world of themselves.

This was partly due to all the brainwashing sales seminars that they attended to boost their ego, because they have little else.

8 out of 10 can't even complete a simple English sentence.

i can complete a simple english sentence. i just have a healthy habit of refusing to use capital letters, while i'm online. you have a job for me, ah phui? got at least $12 per hour, work 3 days, rest 2 days, and WON'T try to fire me when i go ICT or RT training or suddenly MOB-ilisation 3 times a year???

also i like to tell people to:kma: , and lim muh kopi. can a not?
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I totally agree with you, wMulew.

The PAP government should not even waste its precious time and resources to help such people. LHL should, through Amy Khor, tell such people to move out of Sinkapore or become toilet cleaners, hawker centre cleaners, road sweepers, etc...

Yes as the standard pap reply template goes....

There are jobs aplenty, its whether these lazy unemployed sinkies choose to take up these jobs....

Do you want jobs in a hawker center, food court or restaurant?
 

blindswordsman

Alfrescian
Loyal
There is a posting in this forum about a Brit graphic designer who came to SG, loitered around for a few months to find a job, and finally got one. Mind you, he is just a FTsh who could find employment within months and yet sinkie grads could not. What is happening in SG?

Are FTsh more employable than sinkies? What future holds for sinkies in their own country?
 

blindswordsman

Alfrescian
Loyal
I totally agree with you, wMulew.

The PAP government should not even waste its precious time and resources to help such people. LHL should, through Amy Khor, tell such people to move out of Sinkapore or become toilet cleaners, hawker centre cleaners, road sweepers, etc...

Hey buddy, you are wrong. If pappies do not help these jobless sinkies, why should these sinkies vote for pappies to run the Govt? Isn't it the duty of Govt to create employment opportunities for natives? Are pappies doing enough to help sinkies keep their jobs?

If sinkies have to become cleaners and sweepers while the FTsh keep the higher paying jobs in executive and management positions, this country no longer belongs to sinkies.
 

da dick

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yes as the standard pap reply template goes....

There are jobs aplenty, its whether these lazy unemployed sinkies choose to take up these jobs....

Do you want jobs in a hawker center, food court or restaurant?

restaurants? when i applied for casino restaurants, twice, i got rejection email which tell me don't apply ever again. sent 2nd time, no reply. and then they continue hiring more and more chinaman and pinoys anyway. i must be lazzzzzzy rite? :*:
 

lifeafter41

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=2]38% grads can’t find job within 1 year of layoff[/h]
dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
PostDateIcon.png
June 2nd, 2014 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Editorial


Singaporean-workers-300x198.jpg
According to MOM statistics released last month, only 62% of degree holders are able to find a new job within 12 months of losing their job last year [Link].

That means, 38% of them can’t find a job within 1 year after they are laid off.


This is compared to the next lowest rate of 65% for workers with polytechnic diplomas and professional qualifications, and the highest of 71% for those with secondary qualifications.

Degree holders have had the lowest rate of finding new job after being laid off, since 2011.


Also since 2011, degree holders being made redundant was also disproportionately higher than other qualification groups. Last year, degree holders made up 39% of workers who were laid off.

Experts suggested three reasons for this:



  • jobs lost in restructuring tending to be held by graduates
  • greater demand for non-academic skills, and
  • substitution by “skilled foreign labour”


IT project manager Sylvia Tan, 51, lost her job of 29 years when her business unit was cut earlier this year due to restructuring.

“If I had been able to pick up new skills like cloud computing and analytics, maybe they would have retained me,” the computer science graduate said. “But they probably prefer to pay a younger person with less experience and newer skills.”

She found a similar role at a new company within a month, but only because she took a pay cut of 43%.

Many affected Singaporean workers are blaming the over-liberal “foreign talent” policy instituted by the government. In fact, with more “skilled foreign labour” being hired, it exacerbates the problem because the “skilled foreign labour” will tend to hire other “skilled foreign labour”, discriminating the Singaporean workers further.

A survey conducted by recruitment firm eFinancialCareers last year confirmed that a large number of companies in the finance industry are discriminating against Singaporean hires. According to the survey, a majority or 52% of the respondents said their companies had favored foreigners for some job openings (‘Survey confirms rampant job discrimination against SGs‘).

In fact, the situation was so bad that 2 Cabinet Ministers had to have a “friendly talk” with senior members of the financial industry.

Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin told Parliament in March last year that he and Finance Minister Tharman met senior members of the financial industry to urge them to develop a local talent pipeline. Mr Tan said, without going into specifics, that there had been complaints of foreign managers preferring to hire their own countrymen and his ministry was investigating the matter.

In view of complaints made by Singaporeans, MOM will be putting in place the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF) for getting the companies to consider hiring Singaporean workers first.

The FCF which will come into effect this August, requires that all positions paying less than $12,000 a month be advertised on a WDA jobs bank for 2 weeks before a foreign candidate can be hired.

The US, Britain and Australia all have similar skilled foreign workforce policies in place to prevent discrimination against their locals.

It remains to be seen how effective the FCF will be since there is no guarantee that a company will hire a Singaporean even after advertising on the WDA jobs bank. The company can easily discard all the Singaporean resumes after 2 weeks citing unsuitability and continue to hire the “preferred” foreign candidate.

Many affected Singaporean workers are blaming the over-liberal “foreign talent” policy instituted by the government. In fact, with more “skilled foreign labour” being hired, it exacerbates the problem because the “skilled foreign labour” will tend to hire other “skilled foreign labour”, discriminating the Singaporean workers further.


Soon you will find the whole village being hired here to work in Singapore.
 

blindswordsman

Alfrescian
Loyal
restaurants? when i applied for casino restaurants, twice, i got rejection email which tell me don't apply ever again. sent 2nd time, no reply. and then they continue hiring more and more chinaman and pinoys anyway. i must be lazzzzzzy rite? :*:

No, you are not lazy, you happen to be a sinkie. Years ago, we had local Indians, Chinese or Malays coming by to install wiring for Singtel. Today, you find pinoys doing it. Are locals not wanted even by Singtel?
 
Top