377A is just a wayang

[Extremist]

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

are u gay too?

 

[laksaboy]

Sad Plump Gal spotted behind the gay couple.

 

[wMulew]

Alex Au is probably hiding somewhere poking himself with a stick after seeing that

 

[Equalisation]

Itu star tattoos are for target practice of white liquid bullets atau apa ?

 

[Extremist]

Did any of these faggots ever get charge under 377A?

 

[gingerlyn]

Did any of these faggots ever get charge under 377A?

Bro, I suggest you to read this article.
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2007/10/377a-to-prevent-what-harm

Quote:
It is true that there are these assurances of non-enforcement, but this is not the same as a repeal of 377A. The present policy of non-enforcement can be changed, and changed without notice for whatever reason the government of the day deems fit.
More than that, while 377A may not be enforced, discriminatory policies can potentially be built on the logic of its existence –
Employment of the criminal law to prohibit activity which the government does not really think ought to be prohibited, on the sole basis that “the majority” wants it to be prohibited, is fraught with danger. The moral force of the criminal law is blunted if there are crimes which are, the government assures the public, never to be enforced, and its “perpetrators” never brought to court and punished.
Unquote:

 

[laksaboy]

Bro, I suggest you to read this article.
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2007/10/377a-to-prevent-what-harm

Quote:
It is true that there are these assurances of non-enforcement, but this is not the same as a repeal of 377A. The present policy of non-enforcement can be changed, and changed without notice for whatever reason the government of the day deems fit.
More than that, while 377A may not be enforced, discriminatory policies can potentially be built on the logic of its existence –
Employment of the criminal law to prohibit activity which the government does not really think ought to be prohibited, on the sole basis that “the majority” wants it to be prohibited, is fraught with danger. The moral force of the criminal law is blunted if there are crimes which are, the government assures the public, never to be enforced, and its “perpetrators” never brought to court and punished.
Unquote:

Having the 377A law is like entering a bank with a (toy?) gun but reassuring the people there that you're not going to rob the bank.

 

[jw5]

Alex Au is probably hiding somewhere poking himself with a stick after seeing that

So is Debonerman.

 

[Annunaki]

These two CB Kia gay or not gay I also feel like punching them in the face.

 

[3_M]

Bro, I suggest you to read this article.
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2007/10/377a-to-prevent-what-harm

Quote:
It is true that there are these assurances of non-enforcement, but this is not the same as a repeal of 377A. The present policy of non-enforcement can be changed, and changed without notice for whatever reason the government of the day deems fit.
More than that, while 377A may not be enforced, discriminatory policies can potentially be built on the logic of its existence –
Employment of the criminal law to prohibit activity which the government does not really think ought to be prohibited, on the sole basis that “the majority” wants it to be prohibited, is fraught with danger. The moral force of the criminal law is blunted if there are crimes which are, the government assures the public, never to be enforced, and its “perpetrators” never brought to court and punished.
Unquote:

PAP is making a mockery of the law by trying to be politically correct. Either the government enforce 377A or they abolish it. There should be no grey area when comes to law.

 

[NewWorldRecord]

disgusting

 

[Kuailan]

FUCKING ASSHOLE WHAT ARE they trying to Proved??

 

[SlickJon]

these faggots just want 377A appealed so that they can do hanky panky in public...

thats what Tan Eng Hong was charged for before it was changed to doing an obscene act in public...