https://tw.news.yahoo.com/停桃機管制區-客機驚傳千萬零件遭竊-120517453.html
停桃機管制區…客機驚傳千萬零件遭竊
三立新聞網 setn.com
28.9k 人追蹤
三立新聞網
2019年5月14日 下午10:05
記者陳啓明／桃園報導
桃園市長美公司前年底購買一架波音747客機，放置桃園國際機場管制區內，卻遭不明人士竊走客機內價值3000多萬元儀器零件，長美公司今天召開記者會，質疑國安有漏洞，決定向桃園機場、長榮航太等公司提告。桃機公司則表示，法規規定航空器所有人應負保管責任，而桃機的電子圍籬、監控系統等安全設備，目的是維護安全秩序，並非監控航空器本體，因此沒有國安問題，機場公司並無相關保管責任。
▲千萬零件遭竊的波音747客機。（圖／翻攝畫面）
長美公司負責人吳明龍今天在律師陳麗玲陪同下召開記者會，陳麗玲說，長美公司於2017年12月向泰國東方航空公司購買波音747客機，由於該飛機是委由長榮航太負責維修，2018年1月由長榮航太書面通知交機，當時飛機停在機場管制區內，無法上機檢查，沒想到長美公司於當月底登機檢查時，發現客機起落架控制桿、左右航向儀、陀螺儀、姿態儀、磁羅盤等32項零件遭人拆除竊走。
長美公司當下則立即向航警報案，桃機公司無法交代零件為何不翼而飛；長美公司指出，機場國門竟有小偷任意攜帶飛機零件進出，認為國安出現重大漏洞，而偷竊零件若被誤用在其他飛機使用，恐怕會引發航安危機。
長美公司表示，該客機重要零件遭竊，尤其該機停在機場管制區，桃機公司還是要收取560萬元停管費根本不合理，將向桃機公司提起民事訴訟，要求退還停管費，另外也將重新對長榮航太提告，維護權益。
桃園機場公司對此表示，法規規定航空器所有人應負保管責任，而桃機的電子圍籬、監控系統等安全設備，目的是維護安全秩序，並非監控航空器本體，因此無長美公司所指稱之國安問題，機場公司並無相關保管責任。
桃機說，停放於桃機的航空器均應依「桃園國際機場股份有限公司經營機場專用區設施收費基準」收取停留費用，至於長美公司所積欠的停留費，桃機已依法辦理行政執行。
更多三立新聞網報導
Stop the peach control area... The passenger plane was shocked and the parts were stolen.
[三立新闻网 setn.com]
Sanli News Network setn.com
28.9k person tracking
Sanli News Net
May 14, 2019, 10:05 PM
Reporter Chen Qiming / Taoyuan Report
Taoyuan Mayor Company purchased a Boeing 747 aircraft at the end of the year and placed it in the control area of Taoyuan International Airport. However, an unknown person stole more than 30 million yuan of instrument parts from the passenger plane. Changmei Company held a press conference today to question the loopholes in Guoan. Decided to report to Taoyuan Airport, Evergreen Hangtai and other companies. Taoji Company stated that the regulations stipulate that the owner of the aircraft should be responsible for the custody, and the safety equipment such as the electronic fence and monitoring system of the peach machine is to maintain the safety order. It is not the monitoring of the aircraft body. Therefore, there is no national security problem. Related custody responsibility.
▲ Boeing 747 aircraft with 10 million parts stolen. (Figure / flip screen)
Wu Minglong, head of Changmei Company, held a press conference accompanied by lawyer Chen Liling. Chen Liling said that Changmei Company purchased Boeing 747 aircraft from Thai Eastern Airlines in December 2017. Because the aircraft was commissioned by Evergreen Hangtai, 2018 In January, the aircraft was notified in writing by Evergreen Hangtai. At that time, the aircraft was parked in the airport control area and could not be checked on the plane. I did not expect Changmei Company to find the passenger aircraft landing gear lever, left and right heading instrument when boarding the aircraft at the end of the month. 32 parts such as gyroscopes, attitude meters, and magnetic compasses were removed and stolen.
Changmei Company immediately immediately reported to the aviation case that Taoji Company could not explain why the parts were missing. Changmei Company pointed out that the airport country door had thieves carrying aircraft parts in and out, and believed that Guoan had major loopholes, and if the stolen parts were Misuse of other aircraft, I am afraid it will lead to a peace crisis.
Changmei Company said that the important parts of the passenger plane were stolen. In particular, the aircraft was parked in the airport control area. It is simply unreasonable for Taoji Company to charge a 5.6 million yuan to stop the management fee. It will file a civil lawsuit with Taoji Company to request the refund of the stop. Fees will also be re-reported to Evergreen Airways to protect rights and interests.
Taoyuan Airport Company stated that the regulations stipulate that the owner of the aircraft should be responsible for the custody, and the safety equipment such as the electronic fence and monitoring system of the peach machine is to maintain the safety order, not to monitor the aircraft body, so no company has been alleged. For the national security issue, the airport company has no relevant custodial responsibility.
Taotao said that the aircraft parked in the Taoji machine should be charged according to the "Taoyuan International Airport Co., Ltd. operating airport special area facilities charging benchmark" to collect the stay fee. As for the stay fee owed by Changmei Company, the Taoji machine has been administratively executed according to law.
More Sanli News Network reports
停桃機管制區…客機驚傳千萬零件遭竊
三立新聞網 setn.com
28.9k 人追蹤
三立新聞網
2019年5月14日 下午10:05
記者陳啓明／桃園報導
桃園市長美公司前年底購買一架波音747客機，放置桃園國際機場管制區內，卻遭不明人士竊走客機內價值3000多萬元儀器零件，長美公司今天召開記者會，質疑國安有漏洞，決定向桃園機場、長榮航太等公司提告。桃機公司則表示，法規規定航空器所有人應負保管責任，而桃機的電子圍籬、監控系統等安全設備，目的是維護安全秩序，並非監控航空器本體，因此沒有國安問題，機場公司並無相關保管責任。
▲千萬零件遭竊的波音747客機。（圖／翻攝畫面）
長美公司負責人吳明龍今天在律師陳麗玲陪同下召開記者會，陳麗玲說，長美公司於2017年12月向泰國東方航空公司購買波音747客機，由於該飛機是委由長榮航太負責維修，2018年1月由長榮航太書面通知交機，當時飛機停在機場管制區內，無法上機檢查，沒想到長美公司於當月底登機檢查時，發現客機起落架控制桿、左右航向儀、陀螺儀、姿態儀、磁羅盤等32項零件遭人拆除竊走。
長美公司當下則立即向航警報案，桃機公司無法交代零件為何不翼而飛；長美公司指出，機場國門竟有小偷任意攜帶飛機零件進出，認為國安出現重大漏洞，而偷竊零件若被誤用在其他飛機使用，恐怕會引發航安危機。
長美公司表示，該客機重要零件遭竊，尤其該機停在機場管制區，桃機公司還是要收取560萬元停管費根本不合理，將向桃機公司提起民事訴訟，要求退還停管費，另外也將重新對長榮航太提告，維護權益。
桃園機場公司對此表示，法規規定航空器所有人應負保管責任，而桃機的電子圍籬、監控系統等安全設備，目的是維護安全秩序，並非監控航空器本體，因此無長美公司所指稱之國安問題，機場公司並無相關保管責任。
桃機說，停放於桃機的航空器均應依「桃園國際機場股份有限公司經營機場專用區設施收費基準」收取停留費用，至於長美公司所積欠的停留費，桃機已依法辦理行政執行。
更多三立新聞網報導
Stop the peach control area... The passenger plane was shocked and the parts were stolen.
[三立新闻网 setn.com]
Sanli News Network setn.com
28.9k person tracking
Sanli News Net
May 14, 2019, 10:05 PM
Reporter Chen Qiming / Taoyuan Report
Taoyuan Mayor Company purchased a Boeing 747 aircraft at the end of the year and placed it in the control area of Taoyuan International Airport. However, an unknown person stole more than 30 million yuan of instrument parts from the passenger plane. Changmei Company held a press conference today to question the loopholes in Guoan. Decided to report to Taoyuan Airport, Evergreen Hangtai and other companies. Taoji Company stated that the regulations stipulate that the owner of the aircraft should be responsible for the custody, and the safety equipment such as the electronic fence and monitoring system of the peach machine is to maintain the safety order. It is not the monitoring of the aircraft body. Therefore, there is no national security problem. Related custody responsibility.
▲ Boeing 747 aircraft with 10 million parts stolen. (Figure / flip screen)
Wu Minglong, head of Changmei Company, held a press conference accompanied by lawyer Chen Liling. Chen Liling said that Changmei Company purchased Boeing 747 aircraft from Thai Eastern Airlines in December 2017. Because the aircraft was commissioned by Evergreen Hangtai, 2018 In January, the aircraft was notified in writing by Evergreen Hangtai. At that time, the aircraft was parked in the airport control area and could not be checked on the plane. I did not expect Changmei Company to find the passenger aircraft landing gear lever, left and right heading instrument when boarding the aircraft at the end of the month. 32 parts such as gyroscopes, attitude meters, and magnetic compasses were removed and stolen.
Changmei Company immediately immediately reported to the aviation case that Taoji Company could not explain why the parts were missing. Changmei Company pointed out that the airport country door had thieves carrying aircraft parts in and out, and believed that Guoan had major loopholes, and if the stolen parts were Misuse of other aircraft, I am afraid it will lead to a peace crisis.
Changmei Company said that the important parts of the passenger plane were stolen. In particular, the aircraft was parked in the airport control area. It is simply unreasonable for Taoji Company to charge a 5.6 million yuan to stop the management fee. It will file a civil lawsuit with Taoji Company to request the refund of the stop. Fees will also be re-reported to Evergreen Airways to protect rights and interests.
Taoyuan Airport Company stated that the regulations stipulate that the owner of the aircraft should be responsible for the custody, and the safety equipment such as the electronic fence and monitoring system of the peach machine is to maintain the safety order, not to monitor the aircraft body, so no company has been alleged. For the national security issue, the airport company has no relevant custodial responsibility.
Taotao said that the aircraft parked in the Taoji machine should be charged according to the "Taoyuan International Airport Co., Ltd. operating airport special area facilities charging benchmark" to collect the stay fee. As for the stay fee owed by Changmei Company, the Taoji machine has been administratively executed according to law.
More Sanli News Network reports
