No, I am not a clone of parrardee.
But you are certainly a clone of TracyTan866:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?236562-Three-Reasons-SG-Can-t-Compete&p=2525136#post2525136
Last edited:
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Presidential Election 2017
- Thread starter ckmpd
- Start date
But you are certainly a clone of TracyTan866:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?236562-Three-Reasons-SG-Can-t-Compete&p=2525136#post2525136
I already said:
right?
ok...i take your challenge if there is a non pap challenger to do battle with pap candidate at PE 2017
PAP candidate wins 69.9% you win
PAP candidate gets <69.9% i win.
Is that ok?
Last edited:
Hahahah yes mudlanders apparently love to taunt suicide but will never HONOUR it one lah. One just did yesterday. That's their low life trick.
One the one hand you say you are certain which means very very sure that the non PAP candidate will win, then you call my challenge silly and unfair meaning you are therefore not certain of the win.
Make up your mind Miss otherwise too many of such posts will make you look indecisive and make you lose credibility even among your one brain cell supporters.
Or maybe you have the snake qualities, twisting and turning as and when.
So are you certain or not ?
Yes, just like if it's a one-on-one straight fight between LKY/LHL and LTK/CSJ, the candidate that LKY/LHL supports will most probably win at least 60% of the valid votes, as I've explained before:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?235838-This-Is-Terrible-and-Horrible&p=2515882#post2515882
By the way, just as some people consider WP to be PAP's "Team B", Tan Cheng Bock was also Tony Tan's "clone" (just in case Tony Tan lost five years ago), in my opinion.
Last edited:
Yes, just like if it's a one-on-one straight fight between LKY/LHL and LTK/CSJ, the candidate that LKY/LHL supports will most probably win at least 60% of the valid votes, as I've explained before:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?235838-This-Is-Terrible-and-Horrible&p=2515882#post2515882
By the way, just as some people consider WP to be PAP's "Team B", Tan Cheng Bock was also Tony Tan's "clone" (just in case Tony Tan lost five years ago), in my opinion.
let us be precise. dont muddle. Are you saying at least 60% or do you agree the bet is 69.9% and above? there is quite a difference between the two
your point is silly...I have clearly made my point
Actually, since you said:
so if it's a one-on-one straight fight between the "PAP" and the "non-PAP" candidate, I will only allow you to win if the "non-PAP" candidate wins at least 51% of the valid votes.
Last edited:
okay, at least 60%.
"Same result as last year's GE 2015, i.e. PAP wins roughly 70% of the valid votes,"
what happened to the cocksure figure you made? You chicken out within a few hours?
And what happened to the rest of my post that you deliberately refused to quote:
By the way, "70%", even "100%", is also equal to at least "60%".PAP wins roughly 70% of the valid votes, or at least 60%.
And I will certainly not let you win if the "non-PAP" candidate wins only 31%:
so if it's a one-on-one straight fight between the "PAP" and the "non-PAP" candidate, I will only allow you to win if the "non-PAP" candidate wins at least 51% of the valid votes, since you said:
Last edited:
And what happened to the rest of my post that you deliberately refused to quote:
By the way, "70%", even "100%", is also equal to at least "60%".
And I will certainly not let you win if the "non-PAP" candidate wins only 31%:
so if it's a one-on-one straight fight between the "PAP" and the "non-PAP" candidate, I will only allow you to win if the non-"PAP" candidate wins at least 51% of the valid votes, since you said:
just admit you chicken out... it is clear
Just admit that you are a typical immature, stubborn, bitchy, feminist, hypocritical, vain, middle-aged Chinese Sinkie woman, who initially said:
and after you said:
and I refused to accept, and said:
it is you who are now showing signs of "chickening out".
I'll tell you what, if you dare to say that the "non-PAP" candidate will win at least 51% in a one-on-one straight fight with the "PAP" candidate, I will also dare to say that the "PAP" candidate will win at least 70%, not just "at least 60%". Deal?
This is similar to what parrardee said:
to which you replied by accusing him:
followed by repeating his "immature" challenge yourself:
when parrardee had already said "If the PAP candidate is beaten, even by the slightest of margins...", meaning the "non-PAP" candidate winning at least 51% (or even 50.1%) of the valid votes.
I'm not pro-PAP, nor do I agree with everything parrardee (or any other pro-PAP Sinkie) says, but I am aware of the political climate in Singapore, whereas you're not.
Last edited:
Same result as last year's GE 2015, i.e. PAP wins roughly 70% of the valid votes, or at least 60%.
LOLOLOL. PE is not GE. In the only 2 contested elections decades apart, PAP stalwart and future "People's President" Ong Teng Cheong couldn't get 60% against a very reluctant candidate, Tony Tan not even 40%. But you don't have to worry you will be wrong. There will only be one candidate and no election.
If ckmpd is a clone of TracyTan866, I will chop
Similar threads
