$3,000 Defaulter Melvyn Tan is Back

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
25,134
Points
83
http://kementah.blogspot.com/2011/12/45-years-of-national-service-ns.html

[h=2]Friday, December 30, 2011[/h][h=3]45 Years of National Service: NS defaulter's homecoming for National Museum concert [/h]

45 Years of National Service 1967-2012.
This blog will mark the 45th year of NS in 2012 with a series of articles on defence matters Singaporeans can relate to. Your story ideas are, of course, welcome.



In a year that will mark 45 years of National Service (NS) in Singapore, one of the first classical concerts for 2012 will feature a piano recital by someone whose name is inextricably linked to national disservice.

Yes, <strike>Singapore-born British pianist</strike> convicted NS defaulter, Melvyn Tan, is coming to town.

His case was mentioned in Parliament in January 2006. His name was flamed by netizens in numerous discussions on NS obligations for Singapore-born males.

And in a bizarre example of freaky coincidences, his name appeared in a membership recruitment advertisement by SAFRA, the government-linked club for Operationally Ready NSmen (i.e. reservists) and full-time NSmen, in December 2005. Till today, I fail to see the humour of this ad. Maybe it's just me but I believe some defence issues are no laughing matter. The use of Melvyn Tan's name is a hideous example of black humour that parents of NSmen who gave their lives for their country will not find amusing. Please click on the image below and look at the name on the mock Safra card. It may have passed the spell check but the sanity check on this ad was sorely lacking.


Melvyn's homecoming next week, some six years after he triggered the most intense debate on NS defaulters in recent memory, is a timely reminder that time will heal most wounds. He has been elevated from the status of social pariah to a foreign talent courted by Singapore. Good for him.

Indeed, the newspaper article (see opening image) in the 29 December 2011 edition of the 90 cents newspaper sings praises to Melvyn without a single mention of his central role in triggering the debate on NS defaulters. The omission of this fact from an article published by a newspaper of record is interesting to mull over. He must be pleased as punch that his name now graces the national broadsheet under more cheerful circumstances.

Apparently forgiven by Singaporean authorities (because he has paid his fine?), forgotten by Singapore's mainstream media (because the writer did not check Newslink?) and overlooked by netizens who kicked up such a fuss in 2005, Melvyn is due to play at the National Museum of Singapore Exhibition Galleries. The duration of the event from 5 January to 27 January 2012 probably means he will be in Singapore to celebrate the Lunar New Year with his loved ones.

People who followed the Melvyn Tan saga probably recall that he was fined S$3,000 by a Singaporean civil court in 2005 for evading NS 28 years ago. The Tan family also forfeited the S$30,000 security deposit - in then-year dollars a princely sum - coughed up by Melvyn's parents in 1974 when he flew to London to study music.

When this amount of money is spread over a 10-year training cycle that most NSmen undergo and with the 2.5 years of full-time NS factored into the calculus, the penalty that the system extracted from the Tan family is in my opinion a small price to pay. It works out to a sum of S$2,640 a year for every year of NS Melvyn avoided, or just S$220 a month. Pocket change for well-heeled Singaporean families.

In exchange for this fine, the media attention and (apparently transient) cyberspace notoriety, Melvyn kept 2.5 years of his youth (NS was reduced to two years of full-time service in 2004) and was spared the kind of training Singaporean males are put through to keep the city-state safe.

While he chased his dream in London in flagrant disregard for his promise to return to serve NS, his loved ones back home slept safe and sound under the security umbrella carried aloft by every Singaporean son who answered the call to serve their country. His parents will never know the anguish that Singaporean families - especially mothers - experience when their sons and loved ones enter NS.

It is cruel comfort to families of NSmen who died that a defaulter ended up losing a hefty bond and fined by the system. In the past 45 years, a sizeable number of teenage soldiers and middle aged NSmen have died in the course of duty, each one an irreplaceable loss to a society whose birth rate is rapidly in decline.

If Melvyn really wants to put the past behind him, perhaps he could dedicate his performance to the NSmen who died serving their nation while he was away. It would inject meaning to his performance in a year in which Singaporeans will be reminded of how generations of NSmen have served with pride, dedication and distinction.

There must be pockets of Singapore's expatriate community with Singapore-born sons in the same boat as Melvyn who have calculated the possible impact of evading NS. All sorts of schemes and means will be tapped to keep their sons out of uniform. Some families may look at his imminent homecoming with relief and a sense of assurance that the system is able to forgive and apparently forget as grave a transgression as running away from the Singapore Armed Forces.

The Singaporean Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) had better update its tip sheet for National Education discussions on "The Case of Melvyn Tan" because scheming minds may conclude that the price of defaulting NS isn't that onerous afterall.

It appears that if one pays the penalty for defaulting NS, then the system and Singaporean society will someday forgive, forget and say: let's move on.

Posted by David Boey at <a class="timestamp-link" title="permanent link" href="http://kementah.blogspot.com/2011/12/45-years-of-national-service-ns.html" rel="bookmark"><abbr class="published" title="2011-12-30T23:44:00+08:00">11:44 PM</abbr>

 
[h=4]36 comments:[/h]<dl id="comments-block" class="avatar-comment-indent"><dt id="c2399572412247821627" class="comment-author ">
DK said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-2399572412247821627" class="comment-body">Wow, this is a complete mockery of the NS system. Thanks for spotting it.
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 12:16 AM <dt id="c2832113211497104321" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

contrarian said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-2832113211497104321" class="comment-body">This is one instance when I can't agree with you. You mention only the financial penalty of the sanction, but did not mention the other costs which included keeping out of the country until he was past the enlistment age, and giving up his citizenship.

At 36, I am still going through the NS cycle. But I will, in your words, "forgive and forget" those defaulters who leave and stay out until they are beyond the age of 40.
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 12:48 AM <dt id="c7559250508067326198" class="comment-author blog-author"> <noscript></noscript>
David Boey said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-7559250508067326198" class="comment-body">Dear contrarian,
Universality of opinion on this blog is neither sought-after nor important to me.

I value the time and effort that many of you have taken to share your feedback on issues raised here. By sharing your point of view, you contribute to the discussion and help everyone realise that there are many ways to see the same picture.

Re: The Case of Melvyn Tan. Internet discussions years ago in 2005 have commented on the offence of NS evasion and the subsequent penalty, of which the fine and loss of bond are specific, measurable and cannot be disputed (i.e. S$33,000 in total). Google has captured some of these viewpoints.

What is contentious is whether Melvyn got off lightly. This is what sparked off the uproar six years ago.

He could have come home anytime and need not have surrendered his Singapore citizenship.

Instead, his career was built up in London - an astute choice. Remember that in the 1970s and 1980s, Singapore's arts scene was not as vibrant or developed as the one you see today with the Esplanade and high level commitment to the arts.

If 40 is the new 30s, Melvyn has a good 20+ years of economically active life ahead of him.

His appearance at next week's National Museum concert crystallises the deepest fears and suspicions of the discussions in 2005/2006 - that he got off lightly for evading NS.

Is tax payer's money used to stage this concert? I wish someone would tell us.

Are the adverse consequences for NS defaulters that MINDEF talks about applicable only to men of NS liable age? Are these only monetary? So if a person calibrates his career trajectory properly, he could some day return with no social stigma at all?

If I could ask Melvyn one question, it would be simply this:"Why did you choose not to serve?"

I believe his reply would contribute substantially to us understanding why people run away from NS. It is only by having a good sense of ground sentiments that we can build a better system.

Happy New Year.

Best Regards,


David
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 8:19 AM <dt id="c8896726434088713679" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-8896726434088713679" class="comment-body">RE: If I could ask Melvyn one question, it would be simply this:"Why did you choose not to serve?"

It might not be too hard to fathom why. For him, and I dare say many others who have also filed the bond for deferment, and went abroad to complete their education prior to NS, it could have been a simple rational choice of not interrupting his professional education.

The only bee in the bonnet here is that he decided not to return after his deferment period. He made his choice, and chose to live with the consequences of "exile" for decades, not being able to come home. That itself is punishment enough because the roots of origin have been denied for decades though threat of punishment.

He's made it now. Singapore has gained a top-class son. He's come back, paid his fine according to the law and has been punished, let it go.
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 9:28 AM <dt id="c6993757532348052819" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-6993757532348052819" class="comment-body">Well done David for bringing this topic, i serve my NS and also serve as a regular in the training Wing, what NS is about is the "bonding during the sweat and tears,
if he choose "exile" and came back as "hero" yes it is a mockery to the system, even worse for an event mark for "NS"! So have money can escape NS?
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 10:15 AM <dt id="c5352376851980894969" class="comment-author "> <noscript></noscript>
Kojakbt said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-5352376851980894969" class="comment-body">Bro, good article which I think it will resonate with Singaporeans. Can I have your permission to republish this on TR Emeritus?
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 10:49 AM <dt id="c8082124483488887235" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-8082124483488887235" class="comment-body">I have never forgotten the Melvyn Tan saga and also that of our current President's son. There are still a lot of unanswered questions, conveniently swept under the carpet. I know of long term PRs whoe sons rejected NS but are still in our local universities NOW. How does the government account to the thousands of NS men/families who scarificed their time, opportunities and energy in the name of national defense. NS has no meaning to me anymore and I will think of ways and means for my son to skip NS. NS for locals, jobs/scholarships for foreigners, it certainly ring very true.
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 11:16 AM <dt id="c7679151103173232242" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-7679151103173232242" class="comment-body">I find it amusing how much weight you are giving NS as if NSmen were out there fighting an actual war everyday defending our country. It's cute.

The truth is that NS is a massive waste of human talent. We as a country would have been much better off if we didn't waste prime years of our best and brightest on a braindead grind. Even the government understands this when it chooses to send PSC scholars overseas before they are lobotomized by the NS machine.

If the government wants to promote creativity and entrepreneurship in preparation for a future where brainless white-collared automatons are not enough for maintaining the country's edge, then abolishing NS is the most concrete step it can make. Who has time to risk being an entrepreneur when you are already 2 years late to the game?
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 12:02 PM <dt id="c7587923138108135191" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-7587923138108135191" class="comment-body">Imagine if every family has the money and chooses to default on their sons' NS obligation by paying off the required fines and security bonds, what will happen to Singapore's national defence? I equate Melvin as a traitor rather than a "hero" regardless of how others may view him. It appears highly advantageous to be rich and famous in Singapore as the country's systems seem to be more lenient towards them.
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 12:26 PM <dt id="c2594720086785132991" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-2594720086785132991" class="comment-body">"The truth is that NS is a massive waste of human talent.". Is that so?

Anyone with such thinking must have taken national security for granted. Why did the British Army remained in Singapore after it separated from Malaysia if her national security was never an issue at all? We cannot assume Singapore forever is safe from foreign aggression. The frequent skirmishes between Thailand and Cambodia over such a trivial matter as who should "own" the old Preah Vihear temple is a stark reminder of the criticality of national defence. The invasion of Kuwait was practically a 'walk in' exercise for the late Saddam Hussein because of the latter's relatively weak armed forces. Without NS, how many foreign investors you think will be willing to invest their monies in Singapore. The issue of NS should be seen in a broader perspective than simply based on individual aspirations and preferences.
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 1:03 PM <dt id="c8739674828290861651" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-8739674828290861651" class="comment-body">National Service in 1974 was very different to NS in 2011. The treatment and training then was so much tougher. Torture and ill treatment was not uncommon. Our trainers were from Isreal no less. No such thing as welfare. Our boys have it good now

It could be argued if he had come back to serve in 1974, he might not be the world class pianist that he is today, unable to fulfill his full potential.

$30,000 in 1974 was no small amount. One could buy a brand new 5 room HDB flat then and still have change to do the renovation

Do not use today's standard to pass judgement on something that happened in 1974. It was a different world, a different time then
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 1:09 PM <dt id="c4106689943862100887" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-4106689943862100887" class="comment-body">"I find it amusing how much weight you are giving NS as if NSmen were out there fighting an actual war everyday defending our country. It's cute."

This guy probably didn't know between 70's to 90's there are times when we were at near conflict situation if not for NS.

Those serving between 1986 to 1992 in the Combat Bn knew well, I was a regular then when at those years , had to sleep with my boots on every now & then.
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 1:17 PM <dt id="c1793448195956955460" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-1793448195956955460" class="comment-body">Yes, perhaps Melvin should be tarred, feathered and branded on the forehead with a cattle brand.

But, seriously the law should be changed and backdated to provide for a two months jail term for all such 'returnees'. That 'having money is not enough'!
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 1:17 PM <dt id="c474876587816089838" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

Anonymous said... <dd id="Blog1_cmt-474876587816089838" class="comment-body">yeah, right? 30 K is a lot of monies. what a joke!
brand new 5 room in 1974? provided hdb build that and you win the lottery for flats first. that you cannot control. price is just a way to ensure you can own the flat and mbt isn't there to drive hdb prices mad yet.
<dd class="comment-footer">December 31, 2011 1:31 PM <dt id="c206577388829187771" class="comment-author ">
blank.gif

<dd id="Blog1_cmt-6449119085489232007" class="comment-body">
</dd></dl>
 
If I could ask Melvyn one question, it would be simply this:"Why did you choose not to serve?"

The above is the same question that I would want to ask.

As for the other factors, he can go through due process and can lead the life he chooses.
If he thinks he should be specially regarded because he is a concert pianist living overseas, he's greatly mistaken.
Neither should he be viewed as a pariah.
 
Guess which Third World dictator said this:

"I want you to recruit the most primitive people in the country, the uneducated and the jobless. In the Second World War, I saw the Japanese and the British. All the British soldiers were intelligent and educated. But as soldiers they were worthless. The most primitive Japanese soldier gets an order and executes it, and they were extraordinary soldiers. The fact is that the Japanese army defeated the British army.”
 
National Service or conscription goes way back in millennia in ancient China and other ancient civilizations. Soldiering or policing has been a job that few people want unless forced to do it, whether by laws or by circumstances. It's just human nature. What for go through tough training and discipline if there's something else easier to do earning more money? The ones who'd be interested would be the few ones with enough interest, knowledge, capability and ambition to make it to high ranks. However, they'd be the few? How to be a general when they're no foot soldiers? Through most of ancient China history, it was 1-from-2 conscription. 两丁抽一卒。 If you're the only son, you're exempted. If you have brothers, one in two of you must enlist. Four brothers, two must enlist and so forth.

If Singapore, being so small, especially small in citizenry population, doesn't have NS, our army would be reduced to less than 20,000 and our police force would be reduced to less than 5,000. NS pay must not exceed one-third of regular pay. Otherwise, only those army-crazies or police-crazies or desperadoes who can't make it in the world outside would want to sign on. Sign on or don't sign on, same pay, then sign on for what unless you're crazy over it?

Frankly, I wouldn't have signed on too if not for NS. Neither would most of my former colleagues. Almost all of them in my contemporary batches left after bond was up except one who was well known to be police-crazy (in Singlish, siao on) since PA recruit days. He's a Divisional Head of Investigation now.

Question is, out of hundreds, only one is seriously interested and committed. If we take this as fact and free-will of life, then I worry for the safety of Singaporeans, your women and children, for they'd be very few police officers left in the posts, stations and streets. I believe the situation in SAF would be even more dire if there's no NS. UK and USA have abolished NS in the 1950s and 1970s respectively. But they have the population base to have enough regulars.

PRC still has NS but it has a reverse problem, too big a population. PRC men must report for enlistment, but most of them were told to go home and forget it after enlistment. That's a case of circumstance and bureaucracy gone crazy, many of them want to sign on but got rejected. PRC is already feeding 3 million troops.
 
You guys are just jealous that he got away with it for a mere $220 per month.

you wish that you could do the same.
 
You guys are just jealous that he got away with it for a mere $220 per month.

you wish that you could do the same.


you are right .... I am fuckin jealous... i wish some1 string that guy balls....

I am not really in favour of death penalty... call me a idealistic psycho bastard, but I wan to see Yong Vui Kong hanged because others was hanged...

likewise I am not in favour of NS.... but since every1 have to serve ... no1 should be an exception....

he better pay a fuckin shitload of $$ if he wan to getaway with it......otherwise I wan to see Melvyn Tan hanged ...

that is what should be done to traitors
 
You guys are just jealous that he got away with it for a mere $220 per month.

you wish that you could do the same.

I am sure many people cannot. Therein lies the problem.

Should the "escape" clause be available to the well-heeled and connected? Remember, when he left for London he was still a nobody.
 
The issue is not Melvyn.

There are many defaulters who after living in limbo for decades, came back, paid the price and returned to society. They live a quiet life, many with regrets for the wasted years and the torment caused to their families. In some cases, the families carry the burden for sending an impressionable young man on a journey of never-ending stops and starts. I have yet to come across one who has not regretted it.

The issue is both this and previous occasions, the very State that legislated NS is involved in putting his show on the road and he is not doing it for free. It is a mightly slap to everyone who did NS. Even more tragic is those that lost life and limb whilst serving their nation only to see this mudderfucker using the State and the State carrying on as nothing has happenned. It includes the chap who lost his eye to a whipped antenna, the guardmen who fell to their death as the heli pilot released the catch prematurely, the artillery chapps there were blown to bits in NZ, the heli pilots who crashed in Brunei, the chap eho died as detonators in his pocket picked a stary signal, the OCT who was shot in the back and died during training, the F5 pilots who crashed into a Phillipines mountain, the many youngmen who fell and never rose again as they underwent training of some sort.

Teo Chee Hean gave a mighty speech in parliament after the first furore and promised measures that commensurates with the institution of National Service. Hogwash.

Will this society wilt and die if Melvyn does not perform in Singapore without the State being involved. Of is it alright to thumb your fucking noses on the Ah Peks and Ah Mahs who lost their sons.
 
Last edited:
The rogue here is the PAP govt. What the left hand gives, the right hand takes it away. It has to punish the defaulter and it is easy if it is Tan Wah Piow, Lee Siew Choh's son or any ornery motherfucker's son, but when it came to celebs, it cringes at the unpleasant task, end up just whacking the knuckles with a ruler as if anything else will scare the world of talents away. One country, many systems.
 
The case simply shows that if you are special, you will always be loved by the PAP, and that laws can be tweaked to accommodate "special" needs.
 
Frankly, I wouldn't have signed on too if not for NS. Neither would most of my former colleagues. Almost all of them in my contemporary batches left after bond was up except one who was well known to be police-crazy (in Singlish, siao on) since PA recruit days. He's a Divisional Head of Investigation now.

GTB. He is a rare breed in the SPF - a pianist!
 
The case simply shows that if you are special, you will always be loved by the PAP, and that laws can be tweaked to accommodate "special" needs.

double standards are not confined to the pap regime alone. every country will do the same thing. governing societies recognize that a few special geniuses are worth many times more than billions of useless good for nothings. they are global citizens, and no travel restrictions or laws apply to them. they are priceless assets to mankind. if einstein were to be alive today, he could morest your sister in sg and get away with it. michelangelo could sodomize you violently and you would be the one going to jail, not him.
 
The gahment should allow such option, those who want to opt-out of NS, pay a certain amount of $$$ to those who are willing... What a win-win situation!
 
The gahment should allow such option, those who want to opt-out of NS, pay a certain amount of $$$ to those who are willing... What a win-win situation!

Certificate of Exemption (COE)

Set a quota and bid for it every month.
 
Have you not heard of the saying, "Two wrongs doth not a right make"?

hello, bro, we recite the pledge of "equality, social justice..." At least you agree they practise double standards. Or is it 'enlightened meritocracy'?

double standards are not confined to the pap regime alone. every country will do the same thing. governing societies recognize that a few special geniuses are worth many times more than billions of useless good for nothings. they are global citizens, and no travel restrictions or laws apply to them. they are priceless assets to mankind. if einstein were to be alive today, he could morest your sister in sg and get away with it. michelangelo could sodomize you violently and you would be the one going to jail, not him.
 
Last edited:
Money buys you privilege. That's what money is for. If having money was not advantageous, nobody would bother making any.


Have you not heard of the saying, "Two wrongs doth not a right make"?

hello, bro, we recite the pledge of "equality, social justice..." At least you agree they practise double standards. Or is it 'enlightened meritocracy'?
 
Have you not heard of the saying, "Two wrongs doth not a right make"?

hello, bro, we recite the pledge of "equality, social justice..." At least you agree they practise double standards. Or is it 'enlightened meritocracy'?

you should know that the pledge is all bs for hoodwinking the 99% and making all feel warm and fuzzy. even the u.s. constitution is bs to many in power who have seen and used extra-constitutional powers to affect foreign affairs and policies in other countries. you should know that every country has a passport forging department outside the jurisdiction of domestic law and enforcement. if you don't know that, you're being naive and a clueless liberal bleeding heart.
 
Money buys you privilege. That's what money is for. If having money was not advantageous, nobody would bother making any.

Indeed. I could never understand why anyone would wanna put a child rapist like Roman Polanski behind bars when they should be demanding $$ from him instead. More innocent children should be sent to rich men like him for pleasure, I think. It's good for the economy, it's good for paedophiles. Win-win! :)
 
Back
Top