• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

WP's Statement on MRT service disruptions

willpower

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Workers' Party is deeply concerned about the frequency of MRT train service disruptions along the North-South and East-West (NS-EW) lines and the Circle Line, which are managed by SMRT Corporation (SMRT). We are particularly dismayed by the scale of the service disruption between Marina Bay and Braddell MRT stations on the evening of Thursday, 15th December, and how the crisis was managed.

Over 127,000 commuters were affected that evening, and 4,000 passengers were trapped for up to an hour in the packed trains, with limited ventilation in the carriages. At least two passengers had to be hospitalised and others had reportedly fainted. We note that train services were disrupted again on 17th December on the North-South line and services on the entire NW-EW lines will commence service only at 10am on 18th December, affecting thousands more commuters.

We are concerned that the apparent increasing frequency of train service disruptions may be reflective of much deeper infrastructural and technical problems plaguing the 24-year old NS-EW lines.

We question whether these service disruptions were due to insufficient investments in maintenance and upgrades, considering that the MRT system has come under heavy strain over the past 10 years due to the rapid increase in population and ridership. If so, were the lack of essential investments a result of pressure on the public listed MRT operators to minimise costs and maximise profits for the benefit of their shareholders, at the expense of the 2.3 million commuters?

A more immediate concern is the apparent inability of the MRT operators and the relevant government agencies to deal with crises of this scale, despite several large scale civil emergency exercises held in recent years, like Exercise Northstar. We dread to think how much worse the situation could be in the event of a terrorist attack or train collision.

We ask if the Land Transport Authority (LTA), as the regulator of the MRT operators, could have been more vigilant in ensuring that quality of service and safety standards, including train maintenance and operations, were met by SMRT.

The Government cannot stand at arms' length from this extremely serious disruption to the train services. In the matter of this essential public good, the Government is accountable to the people of Singapore for the performance of the MRT operators to ensure the safety and well-being of commuters.

THE WORKERS' PARTY
17 December 2011



Media contacts:

Mr Gerald Giam
Chair, WP Media Team
Email: [email protected]

Mr Pritam Singh
Vice Chair, WP Media Team
Email: [email protected]
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
A bit rhetoric if you ask me - looks more like a NSP release. But the part about terrorist attack is a good point. And I don't think WP stole from Uncle Yap who made the same point.

I also think it was clever to highlight the 2 passengers and others fainting. I didn't read about this. Perhaps intentional to raise this. Now, who was the corpcom chap who said people should not break windows. He should go out along with Saw. People were fainting. He might as well say when Seng Han Tong was set on fire, the grassroots chap should not try to put it out, but wait for fireman to come.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Excellent point.
I also think it was clever to highlight the 2 passengers and others fainting. I didn't read about this. Perhaps intentional to raise this. Now, who was the corpcom chap who said people should not break windows. He should go out along with Saw. People were fainting. He might as well say when Seng Han Tong was set on fire, the grassroots chap should not try to put it out, but wait for fireman to come.
 

freedalas

Alfrescian
Loyal
I'm not holding my breath for the PAP to respond by saying that the WP is making political capital out of this MRT episode.
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
A more immediate concern is the apparent inability of the MRT operators and the relevant government agencies to deal with crises of this scale, despite several large scale civil emergency exercises held in recent years, like Exercise Northstar. We dread to think how much worse the situation could be in the event of a terrorist attack or train collision.

I very much agree. MINDEF and MHA put up such a wayang over Ex. Northstar and yet they can't handle a MRT breakdown.
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
I'm not holding my breath for the PAP to respond by saying that the WP is making political capital out of this MRT episode.

Don't worry, ST reported all opposition parties not just WP alone (others include SPP, SDP and RP).

As for TODAY, total censor on opposition.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Talk is cheap. It's easy to fire potshots from the sidelines.

If the WP were running the show, the MRT system would be in far worse shambles!:rolleyes:
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Talk is cheap. It's easy to fire potshots from the sidelines.

If the WP were running the show, the MRT system would be in far worse shambles!:rolleyes:

to be fair to the pappies, it isn't operated by a political party. it was created by and within gov control, but was given lock, stock and barrel to a corporation to run it. at the time of handover, it was in pristine, flawless condition. a decade later, the entity that is headed by a retailer who knows shit about operating a subway system has degraded its best practice in running a major transport system that crisscrosses the island. a decade is a long time to change or destroy best practices.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is in line with their push for nationalizing the public transport system. Currently LTA builds and SMRT operates the rail system. Any upgrades to existing system is probably borne by SMRT. Hence if costs outweighs benefits, SMRT will not upgrade. The problem is, LTA has not defined minimum service standards to the public transport operators, the failure of which would result in penalties and fines. In short LTA has failed in its role of regulating the monopolies.

In fact, the whole public transport system is fucked up because it assumes the free market (aka GLCs like ComfortDelgro and SMRT) would meet the demands of a growing population. Privatizing the rail system without passing on risks of non-compliance (of service standards) is foolish.

Fines, penalties and tort liabilities should all be part of effective regulatory mechanisms by the LTA. That should keep them on their toes.

Damn bureaucrats should stop running Singapore like a third world colony.
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Leongsam said:
Talk is cheap. It's easy to fire potshots from the sidelines.

If the WP were running the show, the MRT system would be in far worse shambles!:rolleyes:

Should give them the chance. At least they will definitely not have Ms Saw as CEO.
 

freedalas

Alfrescian
Loyal
Talk is cheap. It's easy to fire potshots from the sidelines.

If the WP were running the show, the MRT system would be in far worse shambles!:rolleyes:

How would u know? Things might in fact be better. Hougang has been under WP's management for a long time now, is it in shambles? PAP was creating fear that Hougang would be in shambles if it falls to the opposition, well we all know that not only it did not turn out that way but in many aspects Hougang is better run, and with cheaper service and conservancy charges too. You think the residents at neighbouring Aljunied can't discern that and went ahead to vote WP in blindly. The kind of argument that things would be worse off under the opposition are used by people who wants to perpetuate they being in power and yet has no substance to show it. In any case, it's the role of the opposition in all democracies to highlight the failings of the govt so as to hold them accountable. I'm really surprised that you do not know such a simple political fact for someone who loves to behave as Mr Know-It-All.
 

freedalas

Alfrescian
Loyal
May I refer you to this thread. http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread....-can-play-and-gamble-mahjong-at-the-void-deck

If that doesn't prove my point, I don't know what does.

My dear Mr Leongsam, if u have read further down the thread instead of just glancing at the title, some other forummers said this is a common phenomenon in AMK as well. So it's not something that had happened just because WP is now in charge of Aljunied. In fact, it could well be so a familiar sight in every housing estate that no one iwill even bat an eyelid. The one who took the shot and posted it did so with an ulterior motive of discrediting the WP. Someone else could well have taken a similar photo at a PAP-run constituency. Another example of your political naivity.
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
NSP's non-comments are strange. Not that I want to pick on them, but members of parties are also commenting on their own Facebooks outside their parties' official comments.

A casual comment with a disclaimer by Jeannette and only when asked and no one else on FB. Louder on the race issue and TJS book launch.

NSP members got stake in SMRT is it? Or everyone went on holiday?
 
Last edited:

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
The one who took the shot and posted it did so with an ulterior motive of discrediting the WP. Someone else could well have taken a similar photo at a PAP-run constituency. Another example of your political naivity.

It may be occurring in other wards as well but the fact remains that it is much worse in Hougang. I lived in rented room in AMK for many years and it was very well run with very low levels of crime and vandalism.

Hougang has always been a terrible place. One of my colleagues moved out of Hougang because he couldn't stand it anymore.
 

freedalas

Alfrescian
Loyal
It may be occurring in other wards as well but the fact remains that it is much worse in Hougang. I lived in rented room in AMK for many years and it was very well run with very low levels of crime and vandalism.

Hougang has always been a terrible place. One of my colleagues moved out of Hougang because he couldn't stand it anymore.

If it's really that bad, then why the people kept returning WP in power there. S'poreans are well known to be a most pragmatic lot, if things had indeed worsen to the extent you said, then the voters would only be in a rush to bring the PAP back, and yet in the last GE, WP's majority actually went up. Hougang residents will tell you how hardworking Yaw is and is pretty well regarded.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
If it's really that bad, then why the people kept returning WP in power there.

So by the same logic the PAP must be doing an excellent job then since they've been returned to power in every single election since 1959.
 
Top