• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Everyone likes cooleo

Can u specifically tell us who are these a$$holes?

It's kind of irritating and uncool keep using this term 'a$$holes' on them.

Just tell us who they are in name. Acceptable to you?

Char_Azn said:
U can really tell who are the F**king Assholes in reality just by looking at how they behave when someone isn't around
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Char_Azn said:
I have my differences with Dankos but he at the very least was upfront about it and not stabbing me in the back.
Click to expand...

Dankos stabbed you in the back numerous times via the rep system..
 
Leongsam said:
Dankos stabbed you in the back numerous times via the rep system..
Click to expand...

Yeah my definition of backstabbing probably a bit different and doesn't involve rep points, I generally dun care about who up or drop it. Come to think of it I probably appear "rude" to someone who push my rep up and doesn't get the same from me. I probably used that thing 5-6 times in total throughout my time here
 
Char_Azn said:
Yeah my definition of backstabbing probably a bit different and doesn't involve rep points,
Click to expand...

It's not about points. It's about hurling abuse at you and your parents anonymously. If you don't define that as a backstab, you have a different understanding of the word than I have.

These are just a couple of examples.

[TABLE="class: tborder, width: 90%, align: center"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="class: alt1, align: left"][/TD]
[TD="class: alt1"]Char_Azn[/TD]
[TD="class: alt1"]09:16, 3rd Dec 2010[/TD]
[TD="class: alt1"]0[/TD]
[TD="class: alt1"]fuck your mother cheebye![/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]





[TABLE="class: tborder, width: 90%, align: center"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]Char_Azn
[/TD]
[TD]15:38, 3rd Jun 2011
[/TD]
[TD]-1
[/TD]
[TD]fuck u fat ass



<tbody>
</tbody>


[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
 
Char_Azn said:
I have my differences with Dankos but he at the very least was upfront about it and not stabbing me in the back. One reason why I was against his account deletion

U can really tell who are the F**king Assholes in reality just by looking at how they behave when someone isn't around
Click to expand...

I would have had no problems with you if you had not gone to Sam asking for Danko's IP address and insisting that Dankos declare publicly in the forum that he would not "go after your brother", when he had no intention to anyway.
It was like a primary school kid running to the teacher to complain about his classmate and then insisting that the classmate apologise in front of the whole class.
And if you recall, I told it directly to you.

Other than that, I don't mind your posts even though you are always trying to be objective, analytical, "I support the one who makes sense" etc. I actually like your posts on SG football and travelling, they show your knowledge about these 2 topics and I hope u will post more on these.
 
Maximilian Chua-Heng said:
Cooleo is luring the snake out of the hole man... :D
Click to expand...

I will always remember Cooleo saying that "My gf thinks people here are losers".
Do any of you remember that?

Once, when a picture was posted of LTK and Sylvia paying condolences to LHL at his mother's wake, he made a derogatory comment. I slammed him on that and he as expected whacked me back. :o
After that, we were always wary of each other but were never rude or abusive. Perhaps we were waiting for each other to give the other points, but it has not happened yet. :D
 
LeMans2011 said:
As with all human and beast (a lion is a beast), he has his imperfection. His vulgar self brings out the worst in humanity. eg. Papsmearer is knowlegeable and a good contributor but Cooleo+Papsmearer is a formula for disaster. You can't really tell one from another when they speak to each other.
Click to expand...

Cooleo vs Papsmearer is a formula for disaster - how true.
Don't even know how it started, does anyone know?
Saw their exchanges and it was really ugly from both sides, both giving as good as they got.
Both are actually interesting forummers in their own different ways.
 
Bro jw,

I see your point. Cooelo & I also had some skirmishes.

We choose how we want to remember or view a person.

Hey but people do change here, just look at clinton666. :p

jw5 said:
I will always remember Cooleo saying that "My gf thinks people here are losers".
Do any of you remember that?

Once, when a picture was posted of LTK and Sylvia paying condolences to LHL at his mother's wake, he made a derogatory comment. I slammed him on that and he as expected whacked me back. :o
After that, we were always wary of each other but were never rude or abusive. Perhaps we were waiting for each other to give the other points, but it has not happened yet. :D
Click to expand...
 
Maximilian Chua-Heng said:
Bro jw,

I see your point. Cooelo & I also had some skirmishes.

We choose how we want to remember or view a person.

Hey but people do change here, just look at clinton666. :p
Click to expand...

Clinton666 is different. He has always been very clever and cunning to abuse and then pull back and repeat this many times.
Someone once commented that he was Ivebert. No, he's much more clever and savvy than Ivebert.
Not only did he go after that gay clown but previously, he would also start threads or post very nicely on a variety of topics.

Sometimes I would imagine him posting and then going into the board room to chair a meeting. :D
 
Char_Azn said:
No problems with the guy although he did ban me once. I had to admit I was kinda asking for that one though. Dun see why he needs to leave just coz he have no power to do infraction any more. And the thread about him disappearing shows how many assholes in here who are Freaking Hypocritical Backstabbers. Cooleo at the very least doesn't say 1 thing and do something else.
Click to expand...

I have to expose your hypocrisy since you call people here Assholes and Freaking Hypocritical Backstabbers.

Firstly, dont be stupid, who is talking behind Cooleo's back? Do you mean to say Cooleo is not able to read the posts here? Just because he is not posting in his Cooleo nick does it necessarily mean he is away???

I find you hypocritical. You profess to be politically neutral and even slams PAP characters a few times to prove your point, but let me pick a few of your posts and let others decide whether you are pro-PAP. Some of your posts below:

U want examples, look at Taiwan and Korea. The economy went backward became stagnant or had slower growth then SG after they ditched the 1 party system. I think we all agree that the Taiwanese and Koreans are more independent minded pple compared to Singaporeans who pretty much depended on the government for EVERYTHING!!!! What is the first thing we do when something goes wrong? Blame the government and expect them to fix it. Don't believe me, go take a look at 99.9999% of the thread in this forum
Click to expand...
Is it not the government's fault that we have FTs fighting for karung-guni business in SG? Who allowed these FTs to make a living in SG? Did you not quote your statement from some PAP MPs?

U seriously want to compare past achivements? Low held Hougang for a few terms vs LKY who drag SG from 3rd world to first.

I just pointed out a simple fact to counter your question. Why did LKY had to come out and state 2 party system not good. Very simple coz Low's WP election slogan was "Towards a 1st world government" meaning more opposition in Parliament = good. As far as the Old Man is concern, it's a direct counter.

Low isn't one that talk that much sense coz he almost doesn't talk at all in Parliament. You guys seem to be forgetting why WP was called Wayang Party. Coz no action from them, in fact more then a few person in here have constantly called WP PAP dogs by a lot of pple in here because of that before this election. Talk about short term memory

Low isn't a very good Parliamentarian, he doesn't speak very well(mostly due to his Chinese background) and he is pretty lousy at debates(if anyone of you actually bother catching Parliamentary sessions). What he is however is a freaking genius at building a political party and a brilliant political strategies. He is patient, knows how to bid his time, knows when to strike and how to strike. Him leaving Hougang for Aljunied and bringing all this best man with him is a calculated and brilliant move. Like what some of the PAP man said, "blackmailing the Aljunied" resident to vote for them for fear of not having an opposition in Parliament.

His patience can be seen via his performance in Parliament. Keeping quiet in Parliament is not a sign of weakness like how most pple see it. He waits for an opportunity to strike and only talk when he deems appropriate. Chiam was the same, how did U think the 2 survived in Parliament this long. If it was that idiot Chee in Parliament, he wouldn't have lasted 1 term.
Click to expand...
Nobody bashes WP or LTK except PAP. You seemed to pick on WP and LTK a lot, when these are the embodiement of successful opposition in Singapore
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

disconsolate
Darshen Kuna : Economy-class plane passengers are 'peasants'.
Replies
4
Views
242
VanDick
VanDick
O
CNY reopens painful old wounds
2 3 4
Replies
60
Views
3K
True Believer
T
Hmv
The parts black snake shan left out in MPS saga, according to Kirsten han
Replies
13
Views
911
WangChuk
W
sbfuncle
Chitchat Why Amerigans has different view over it?
Replies
0
Views
133
sbfuncle
sbfuncle
duluxe
Negeria: Islamic cleric defends death penalty for whoever changes religion
Replies
0
Views
66
duluxe
duluxe
Back
Top