- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 4,968
- Points
- 48
I find you hypocritical. You profess to be politically neutral and even slams PAP characters a few times to prove your point, but let me pick a few of your posts and let others decide whether you are pro-PAP. Some of your posts below:
Is it not the government's fault that we have FTs fighting for karung-guni business in SG? Who allowed these FTs to make a living in SG? Did you not quote your statement from some PAP MPs?
How is this being a Pro-PAP supporter. Someone asked for my opinion of whether I am for a single or dual party system. If you check the thread that I posted that, I already stated I am more in favor of a strong ruling party. My opinion will still be the same, if WP/NSP/SDP takes over government one day. That they should be given enough freedom to rule effectively instead of having a opposition party so strong that nothing gets done. U are seeing this as a "Pro-PAP" post only because U take into account the current ruling party and not accounting for the fact that PAP will get kicked out one day. There is a big difference between what I think is a good political system and what party I support.
U also failed to highlight the fact that I clearly stated that I have no problems with WP becoming strong power in government as long as it's a gradual process instead of having a sudden surge within a single election which I gave the quoted statement as a reason. The 2 country democratized and suffered during the period(Taiwan still ongoing) and their citizens are more independent minded then us. I am oppose to going through what they went through which is a wholesale change within a single election and in favor of a slow gradual one.
U are nitpicking on a single statement without regard for what I said as a whole.
Last edited: