NS nurtures serial killers?

Alamaking

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
19,724
Points
83
Wow, Woodland mooncake festival murderer was caught, he was also involved in attacks at Yishun and Sambawang, the murderer is an 20 years old NS man. All targets are female, attacks was stabbing from the back with no feuds, random attacks.
 
I knew it!!! Alamaking is madmansg. madmansg is Alamaking.

I've found the smoking gun!
:D


Wow, Woodland mooncake festival murderer was caught, he was also involved in attacks at Yishun and Sambawang, the murderer is an 20 years old NS man. All targets are female, attacks was stabbing from the back with no feuds, random attacks.
 
If NS doesn't nurture serial killers, then I worry. NS is supposed to nurture serial killers to kill enemies, serially.
 
At the risk of digressing, with the elections coming, I think that any party that resorts to demagoguery will gain a lot of seats. You want to win, just tell the sheep in Sinkieland that with their mandate, you'll replace NS with professional force, kick out FThrash and drop all the stealth taxes. Just don't bother with "freedom of expression". Sinkie sheep are apathetic to that. Which is why SDP is a joke amongst many Sinkie sheep.
 
At the risk of digressing, with the elections coming, I think that any party that resorts to demagoguery will gain a lot of seats. You want to win, just tell the sheep in Sinkieland that with their mandate, you'll replace NS with professional force, kick out FThrash and drop all the stealth taxes. Just don't bother with "freedom of expression". Sinkie sheep are apathetic to that. Which is why SDP is a joke amongst many Sinkie sheep.

NSF + Reservists = almost 500,000 (SAF, RSN, RSAF, SPF and SCDF)

All Regulars = hardly 50,000 (how to survive?)
 
NSF + Reservists = almost 500,000 (SAF, RSN, RSAF, SPF and SCDF)

All Regulars = hardly 50,000 (how to survive?)

I've my thoughts on the feasibility of that. But that's beside the point. I'm talking about winning the elections. Winning the elections and governing a country are two different matters. That's why I said that you need demagoguery to win the elections. Promise everything during election period. Whether you can fulfill or not is irrelevant. Sinkie sheep are largely apathetic to political issues. To paraphrase Jerry Maguire, just show them the money.
 
I've my thoughts on the feasibility of that. But that's beside the point. I'm talking about winning the elections. Winning the elections and governing a country are two different matters. That's why I said that you need demagoguery to win the elections. Promise everything during election period. Whether you can fulfill or not is irrelevant. Sinkie sheep are largely apathetic to political issues. To paraphrase Jerry Maguire, just show them the money.

You're a real politician. You should join a party to stand for election. A politician is not about fulfulling promises. A politician is about making enough promises to win an election and being able to explain away why promises can't be kept after winning. :D
 
You tell sinkie sheep that you will fight to the bitter end for their freedom and their response will probably go somewhere along the line of "Siao! I rather you give me money". Politics, as with all things in life, is about adapting to the demands of those whom you seek to exploit and manipulate. In simple terms, tell them what they want to hear. It's simple arithmetic: in every country, the average ratio of sheep to intellectuals is approximately 10:1. So why bother pandering to the whims of the minority? After all, democracy is nothing more than two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner. Majority rules.
 
You tell sinkie sheep that you will fight to the bitter end for their freedom and their response will probably go somewhere along the line of "Siao! I rather you give me money". Politics, as with all things in life, is about adapting to the demands of those whom you seek to exploit and manipulate. In simple terms, tell them what they want to hear. It's simple arithmetic: in every country, the average ratio of sheep to intellectuals is approximately 10:1. So why bother pandering to the whims of the minority? After all, democracy is nothing more than two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner. Majority rules.

Tell that to some moronic opposition candidates. They're like some flies banging against the windscreen over and over again in the same way. Then come up with some conspiracy theory that the glass is conspiring against them or the glass is fearing the wrath of the master of the glass.
 
Tell that to some moronic opposition candidates. They're like some flies banging against the windscreen over and over again in the same way. Then come up with some conspiracy theory that the glass is conspiring against them or the glass is fearing the wrath of the master of the glass.

Indeed. I'm no psychologist but I think these 反对党 just want to blame their personal failings on the "evil" rich or PAPpies. Then they convince themselves that they are the next Mandela or Gandhi, fighting against the tyrants on behalf of the people (who laughs at them in return). What a joke! PAPpies are no angels but do they really think Sinkie sheep would rather vote for them than PAPpies?
 
Back
Top