Chitchat Naive millenials think toxic companies care that people are leaving and will bother to "fix the culture" *LOL*

[Si1verwolf]

"Realistically, there are probably a bunch of people at the company who shouldn’t be here,” Zuckerberg said in a recording obtained by The Verge.
“Part of my hope by raising expectations and having more aggressive goals, and just kind of turning up the heat a little bit, is that I think some of you might decide that this place isn’t for you"

https://www.peoplematters.in/news/l...-staff-bunch-of-people-shouldnt-be-here-34724

 

[k1976]

Keep an eye for this phrase the millennial/Gen Z snowflakes enjoy: 'safe space'.

I think I have seen 'safe space' on a poster at the NUS campus during one of my recent explorations there. And there is a 'gender neutral' toilet near the Central Library, see if you can spot it if you're in that area.

Wow…uou mean NUs is not that safe so it need to create safe space awareness??

 

[True Believer]

"Realistically, there are probably a bunch of people at the company who shouldn’t be here,” Zuckerberg said in a recording obtained by The Verge.
“Part of my hope by raising expectations and having more aggressive goals, and just kind of turning up the heat a little bit, is that I think some of you might decide that this place isn’t for you"

I am in favour of clearing out dead wood because there is no free lunch as far as any boss is concerned. However, in many companies, the boss prefers to be surrounded by average supporters in his management team. It creates a "safe space" for him as there won't be outstanding leaders who are a threat to his position nor will he have deputies who will disagree with his direction for the company. Unfortunately, groupthink will be entrenched like the PAP, where nobody dares to disagree with the PM or SM.

 

[k1976]

I am in favour of clearing out dead wood because there is no free lunch as far as any boss is concerned. However, in many companies, the boss prefers to be surrounded by average supporters in his management team. It creates a "safe space" for him as there won't be outstanding leaders who are a threat to his position nor will he have deputies who will disagree with his direction for the company. Unfortunately, groupthink will be entrenched like the PAP, where nobody dares to disagree with the PM or SM.

Well, Sinki need to be educated to be like sheep’s and have conformance mindset

 

[True Believer]

Well, Sinki need to be educated to be like sheep’s and have conformance mindset

If employees display any brilliance, their supervisors might fear being replaced by the very subordinates whose work appraisals they graded favourably. Many rising stars in a company receive a rude shock at their next performance review; instead of the expected glowing appraisal, their bosses criticise their decision-making and marginalise their contributions. Whether such talents resign in anger or are forced out, the organisation loses a vital contributor because of a paranoid boss trying to sabotage a subordinate perceived as a threat to his job.

 

[RelativeMath8994]

If employees display any brilliance, their supervisors might fear being replaced by the very subordinates whose work appraisals they graded favourably. Many rising stars in a company receive a rude shock at their next performance review; instead of the expected glowing appraisal, their bosses criticise their decision-making and marginalise their contributions. Whether such talents resign in anger or are forced out, the organisation loses a vital contributor because of a paranoid boss trying to sabotage a subordinate perceived as a threat to his job.

Also many colleagues and coworkers are foreigners that can't wait to push locals out. Because useless managers and bosses are too dense, listening to whatever bullshit spew into their ears like sacred words. The reason why so many things are declining because incompetent people are at higher position guarded by their own idiots 'yes' men, they got no real talent to challenge or question their decisions.

 

[True Believer]

Also many colleagues and coworkers are foreigners that can't wait to push locals out. Because useless managers and bosses are too dense, listening to whatever bullshit spew into their ears like sacred words. The reason why so many things are declining because incompetent people are at higher position guarded by their own idiots 'yes' men, they got no real talent to challenge or question their decisions.

If you see a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that is a post turtle. It didn't get up there by itself. It doesn't belong up there. It's out of its comfort zone. It doesn't know what to do while it's up there. It's stuck and unproductive. You just wonder what kind of dumbass put it there in the first place! A post turtle is in a position of power that he didn't achieve through his own efforts. Someone put him there. He lacks the necessary skills, knowledge or understanding to perform effectively. He is stuck, like a turtle on a post. The term is used to point out cronyism in leadership roles.

 

[Sustanon]

Keep an eye for this phrase the millennial/Gen Z snowflakes enjoy: 'safe space'.

I think I have seen 'safe space' on a poster at the NUS campus during one of my recent explorations there. And there is a 'gender neutral' toilet near the Central Library, see if you can spot it if you're in that area.

 

[True Believer]

Also many colleagues and coworkers are foreigners that can't wait to push locals out. Because useless managers and bosses are too dense, listening to whatever bullshit spew into their ears like sacred words. The reason why so many things are declining because incompetent people are at higher position guarded by their own idiots 'yes' men, they got no real talent to challenge or question their decisions.

This describes the PAP where cronyism and nepotism rule. Groupthink is deeply entrenched and nobody dares speak up for the long suffering people because of the fear of losing their iron rice bowl filled with gold ingots.

 

[Si1verwolf]

HR is there to protect the business/company.

When staff whistle-blow, you're naive to believe HR will protect the staff. HR will use the information to protect the company.

"A whistleblower brought allegations regarding client documents being inappropriately shared internally to the senior leadership team.
An internal investigation did not substantiate the claims, with a further external legal firm also supporting the outcome."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05...ishandled-whistleblower-allegations/106737180

Hard truths *LOL*

Human Resource, by the way, is there to protect the business and not the wage-cucks....errr....employees.

People leaving? By all means. It's a time-tested stamped-chopped-certified effective HR strategy called 'managing people out'.

Meanwhile, there's still a long queue outside, fresh meat eager and willing to take over your place.

There's nothing human about human resource

 

[jsctan]

He should

Army special forces, combat-tested, survived sleep deprivation and enemy fire. But this too does not make one immune.

Entity also still doing very well. Very very long queues of fresh grads lining up to join. Share price is in fact at an all time high. *LOL*

Bank of America banker who died had sought to leave, citing long hours​

https://www.reuters.com/business/fi...-citing-long-hours-recruiter-says-2024-05-15/

He should have come to Singapore instead. Cecas having fun ...especially the other Gupta in our local bank.

 

[True Believer]

HR is there to protect the business/company. When staff whistle-blow, you're naive to believe HR will protect the staff. HR will use the information to protect the company. "A whistleblower brought allegations regarding client documents being inappropriately shared internally to the senior leadership team. An internal investigation did not substantiate the claims, with a further external legal firm also supporting the outcome." Hard truths *LOL*

There was an accusation of sexual harassment made against a senior manager at one of my former companies by a young female subordinate. The CEO and HR questioned the manager who flatly denied the accusation, and the woman was told to show proof i.e. an audio or video recording. Failure to produce the evidence meant that the case was closed; how does she tell the manager to repeat his fondling and start recording the video while he does so? The aggrieved woman resigned thereafter when her boss made life hell for her.

 

[A Singaporean]

Duplicate.