• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Inderjit Singh: Govt FT policy is wrong!

From the last few posts, I can sense that people are now opening up their eyes and can see through the real deal behind the act.
Well done.

Nothing maverick about him, he is faking it all the way. U think the PAP exec committee will still allow him to remain as a MP if he voiced dissension against them?
 
He can't be too assertive, or he'll be out. That's the sad reality.
In my opinion, only he and Lily Neo seem willing to really speak out against government policy and speak up for the people.
Most of the others seem to simply go through the motions.

I miss Tan Soo Koon. He was threw out by LHL leadership because LHL cannot take stress from him for being direct and vocal against bad policies. Fortunately, Singaporeans no longer buy into PAP leadership now. Singapore is in a stage of mess and falling apart. We are united and counting down to a swift and decisive election for a new beginning, once and for all good of the Republic of Singaporeans.
 
I daresay that if they lift the Whip more often, our Sikh friend might just court the lightning strike.

C'mon guys, he may not be true blue Oppo but I sense he speaks with his conscience, which the majority of PAP MPs don't.

I'm also not saying it's so ok now with dissenting voices within PAP that we dont have to vote more Opps. Sure we have to.


How far out depends on the class of licence and insurance LHL gives him. He's not only PAP, he's in AMK GRC. It's quite a joke to elect a team of six MPs to disagree with each other, one of them being PM. Go figure.

From the last few posts, I can sense that people are now opening up their eyes and can see through the real deal behind the act.
Well done.

Nothing maverick about him, he is faking it all the way. U think the PAP exec committee will still allow him to remain as a MP if he voiced dissension against them?
 
People they are just singing the populist tune, in preparation for the election.
 
Quite possible, in that case, the Whip wld be asking the backbenchers to close ranks. But this Bayi continues to plant ideas where they went wrong. The PAP may be too confident they can get away with tempting the Devil.

People they are just singing the populist tune, in preparation for the election.
 
Its so obvious, the game plan has now suddenly shifted towards speaking up on matters that has been irking the people, who has spoken up against such policies for the longest time. Suddenly you find new rules popping up making it "favorable" towards the citizens, speeches by ministars and mp against too many fts...:mad:
 
It's all about election, I want to believe Bayi is given the green light to say what the opposition wanted to say in the first place, nothing in the parliament is left to chance.

The end game is Win the next Election, at all cost.

Quite possible, in that case, the Whip wld be asking the backbenchers to close ranks. But this Bayi continues to plant ideas where they went wrong. The PAP may be too confident they can get away with tempting the Devil.
 
The Whip is quite a powerful position in the ruling party. The Whip represents the PM and Cabinet to their backbenchers. If the PM or some other ministers are displeasured by some backbenchers' acts or comments, they don't approach or reproach the offending backbenchers directly. They give the briefings to the Whip who would go and sort it out with the backbenchers, then report back and/or take appropriate action. The Whip has power up to recommending that any backbench MP be removed, especially in GRCs where no by-election is required. In SMCs, it's rare or never. They'd just sideline the offending backbencher and wait for the next GE.
 
Yes, you are very right about the protocol of the party Whip.

A failed PAP MP aspirant once told me that one of the virtues that the PAP looks for in potential candidates is the ability to "toe the party line". Some of them like Inderjit are given some leeway to criticise without driving too large a stake into the issue. Just enough to give the impression that the PAP has within it's ranks enough "opposition" to keep itself clean and accountable. I believe this is what often leads to the idea that the PAP will "split" into two camps once the old man dies.
 
The Whip is quite a powerful position in the ruling party. The Whip represents the PM and Cabinet to their backbenchers. If the PM or some other ministers are displeasured by some backbenchers' acts or comments, they don't approach or reproach the offending backbenchers directly. They give the briefings to the Whip who would go and sort it out with the backbenchers, then report back and/or take appropriate action. The Whip has power up to recommending that any backbench MP be removed, especially in GRCs where no by-election is required. In SMCs, it's rare or never. They'd just sideline the offending backbencher and wait for the next GE.

Yes, you are very right about the protocol of the party Whip.

A failed PAP MP aspirant once told me that one of the virtues that the PAP looks for in potential candidates is the ability to "toe the party line". Some of them like Inderjit are given some leeway to criticise without driving too large a stake into the issue. Just enough to give the impression that the PAP has within it's ranks enough "opposition" to keep itself clean and accountable. I believe this is what often leads to the idea that the PAP will "split" into two camps once the old man dies.
 
I miss Tan Soo Koon. He was threw out by LHL leadership because LHL cannot take stress from him for being direct and vocal against bad policies. Fortunately, Singaporeans no longer buy into PAP leadership now. Singapore is in a stage of mess and falling apart. We are united and counting down to a swift and decisive election for a new beginning, once and for all good of the Republic of Singaporeans.
He only became "vocal" after he "stepped down" as the speaker of parliament.
It's disappointing that even someone like you is not clear about this, although I do appreciate your clarity on other matters.
 
Inderjit has always been forthright and his area of interest is sme and entreneurship. He has been rather vocal issues during this term of parliament. He is self made and does not need the PAP but he has been a PAP man since his university days.

He asked to step down from parliament and not contest the next GE. He has been very influential within the party because he seldom holds back. He is the closest thing to Tan Cheng Bock.
 
Well summed up. That's why I still think he'll make a good Independent or if any Opp can get him on its wagon, he'll be an asset.

Inderjit has always been forthright and his area of interest is sme and entreneurship. He has been rather vocal issues during this term of parliament. He is self made and does not need the PAP but he has been a PAP man since his university days.

He asked to step down from parliament and not contest the next GE. He has been very influential within the party because he seldom holds back. He is the closest thing to Tan Cheng Bock.
 
Well summed up. That's why I still think he'll make a good Independent or if any Opp can get him on its wagon, he'll be an asset.

I'm free to vote for the opposition just like Indy Singh is free to join them.

ie. this doesn't change which side I'm voting for in the next GE.
 
Wait a minute. Wasn't that Davinder Singh? I remember alot of "Davinder Code" jokes flying around during that time.

You remembered wrongly. It was Inderjit Singh who "saboed" James Gomez in GE 2006, quoting that Gomez has "wayanged". Davinder Code has to do with his inside info in the NKF / T.T. Durai case.
 
He was a group of early batches of NTU student leaders identified by then PAP MP Yeo Choo Kok who was also director of Student Affairs at NTU. The first NTU student president Sinnakaruppan became an MP for 2 terms, followed by Inderjit Singh and then Lee Bee Wah. Only the 2nd Student Union president Mohd Akbar though groomed and a PAP member did not make the cut.

The desire then was a desire to push NTU and its student into the limelight and build a network. NUS already had Viv Balakrishnan, Simon Tay already in the mix.

These groups were given some level of independence. MP Yeo Choo Kok was posted there for a purpose.





Could it be due to this, the PAP 'captured' him to prevent him fallling into the enemy?
 
Back
Top