• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

10% GST lai liao!

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
15,744
Points
83
so u really think pinky is that generous, huh?

wait long long.

10% gst coming. this is a double whammies for the citizens. first, pinky mentioned the compulsory medishield life which means more money gonna leeched out of our cpfs. and now the 10% gst.....

what's next?
:oIo:
 
GST hike ‘more likely’ if Govt needs to raise revenue for new initiatives
GST hike ‘more likely’ if Govt needs to raise revenue for new initiatives
TODAY file photo
mail
print
View all 24 comments


Share on Tumblr

BY
WONG WEI HAN
-22 AUGUST
SINGAPORE — The Government is unlikely to raise income tax to pay for the slew of healthcare, housing and infrastructure initiatives announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong during the National Day Rally as doing so could risk damaging Singapore’s appeal for businesses and investors.

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) might instead be the first in line for an increase should the Government need to raise revenue to help build a stronger social safety net, economists have told TODAY.

“Raising income tax is not very possible if Singapore wants to remain relevant for multinational corporations and high-income global talents,” UOB economist Francis Tan said.

“A more probable venue for change is the consumption tax bracket, and I do not think it’s impossible for us to increase GST from the current 7 per cent to 10 per cent. For years we’ve been cutting income-related taxes to move towards a more consumption-based system. This is to make Singapore more attractive than other developed countries where income tax rates are much higher. I don’t see us reversing this trend.”

Barclays economist Joey Chew pointed out that in Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s Budget 2012 speech, he compared the Republic’s income tax levels with those of Hong Kong. Mr Tharman had said that income taxes are significantly higher at the top end of incomes compared with Hong Kong and, as result, there is a limit to how high taxes can go at the top end without hurting competitiveness.

Hence, a GST hike is more likely, said Ms Chew, adding that the Government is well-prepared should such a move prove necessary.

“GST is regressive, but the government would provide offsets to lower-middle income households, as they have done so in previous rounds of GST hikes,” she said. “Now that we have the permanent GST Voucher Scheme, the offsets are even easier to implement. The groundwork has already been laid for an eventual increase in GST.”

On Sunday, Mr Lee cautioned that “all good things must be paid for”, either by raising taxes or cutting other spending so that future generations will not be laden with debt. This follows previous statements made by Mr Lee and other ministers suggesting that higher taxes are on the cards in Singapore after years of relatively low rates.

Regardless of how the government plans to fund the higher social spending, Singapore will not feel the pinch in the near future as it has ample financial resources to support the measures, said CIMB economist Song Seng Wun.

“Take the last fiscal year ending March 2013 as an example. Singapore’s operating revenue — mainly from collection of taxes, including GST — was S$55.8 billion. Including other revenue such as land sales, the gross earning was S$80.4 billion,” Mr Song said. “Of that, we spent a total of S$46.2 billion. So, we have some S$34.1 billion in surplus.”

He added: “Over the longer run, as our population ages, Singapore’s operating revenue might shrink, and spending rise — only then would we need to increase tax, in which case I think the government will more likely focus on GST ... Overall, I don’t see our business attractiveness or growth potential getting diminished (by the new measures).”

Ultimately, tax rates are just one of the determinants of Singapore’s business potential, said Mr Tay Hong Beng, KPMG’s head of tax in Singapore. “Investors also look at other factors such as political stability, business infrastructure and the ease of doing business,” Mr Tay said.

It is also possible for the Government to increase revenue without raising tax rates, he added, by improving Singapore’s competitiveness in the global marketplace. “(This will) lead to rising incomes, and hence tax collections.”
 
If indeed our GST will be raised to 10%, I will tiu the 1st fooktard who say we're as competitive as HK.
 
well well... nothing surprising.... the population ponzi scheme is all about socializing the cost of the population increase but privatizing the profits.
 
If no increase in GST, I very worried. Because you can't predict what else the MIW will implement and their new idea could even be more terok.
 
We were told that lesser headcounts means higher tax in future. Now it seems like we are being ask to pay higher tax despite the fact that gov have more people to tax from.

We are not getting our part of the deal.
 
10% is too modest

15 % will be just right

the more you spend, the more you pay

the more you eat out,the more you pay

the more you buy , the more you pay

if you are poor, you don't spend out, you don't eat out, you don't go pubbing and you stay at home
exercise and take good care of your health, you don't have to suffer the 15% GST

yes, the money from the GST will be harvested back and then help the poor and finance all the subsidies

this is a brilliant idea....
 
That shiny head finance MP confirmed no increase in GST during the last GE for the next 5 years.
He now broke his promise? This will cost him a lot of vote swing in the next GE.
 
That shiny head finance MP confirmed no increase in GST during the last GE for the next 5 years.
He now broke his promise? This will cost him a lot of vote swing in the next GE.


What can you expect from someone who overspent on YOG by 400% to 500%.

You have to wonder where all the money went to because nothing new was built. They simply reused the facilities that was already in place & yet they over spent
 
[video=youtube;WoiGPKAjTHA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WoiGPKAjTHA[/video]

see ah?
 
[video=youtube;u6zheEf4EDE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6zheEf4EDE[/video]

if GST rise, Tharman is a liar, and LHL already say "if he has lied, he has to go."
 
What can you expect from someone who overspent on YOG by 400% to 500%.

You have to wonder where all the money went to because nothing new was built. They simply reused the facilities that was already in place & yet they over spent

Hey bro. You got the wrong guy lah. Just because they are both same color doesn't mean they have the same size brain.
 
step 1. make cpf life compulsory for everyone till 90 yo. means those with lesser cpfs are finished. they can forget seeing their life saving anyone.

step 2. after implementing 1, pinky would say many couldn't afford so bo bian raise gst 10% which the gov would use the tax to "help more poor and needies". their help means putting the invisible money into your cpf life which is like got give; like got never give. either way, u dun get to see the money and not even to say u r going to use it.

step 3. this is our responsibility and that is TO VOTE THOSE BASTARDS OUT IN GE2016!
 
so u really think pinky is that generous, huh?

wait long long.

10% gst coming. this is a double whammies for the citizens. first, pinky mentioned the compulsory medishield life which means more money gonna leeched out of our cpfs. and now the 10% gst.....

what's next?
:oIo:

lianbeng already said before liao! GST 10% is just a matter of time mah! :D all no belip!
 
If indeed our GST will be raised to 10%, I will tiu the 1st fooktard who say we're as competitive as HK.

Even more competitive, as unlike Hong Kong, Singapore does not have a minimum wage law. ;)
 
I knew the GST hike is going to come sooner or later. It's just a question of timing: you can't implement it just before an election, for obvious reasons. :cool:

Keep in mind that as the base population of Singapore has increased, every % of GST increment now will yield much more tax revenue than compared to five or ten years ago.

Of course, the PAP govt and its media sycophants will come out in full force and put a positive spin on things, claiming that it will 'help the poor' with the pittance it dishes out in rebates and subsidies. Uh-huh. :rolleyes:
 
Hey bro. You got the wrong guy lah. Just because they are both same color doesn't mean they have the same size brain.


Oops I keep getting mixing up the botak guy with the other one :)

The current crop of MPs are so unexceptional that they all look the same to me
 
Also,..with government induced inflation, GST will bring in more revenue as it will be taxed on the inflated price,,,

10% is too modest

15 % will be just right

the more you spend, the more you pay

the more you eat out,the more you pay

the more you buy , the more you pay

if you are poor, you don't spend out, you don't eat out, you don't go pubbing and you stay at home
exercise and take good care of your health, you don't have to suffer the 15% GST

yes, the money from the GST will be harvested back and then help the poor and finance all the subsidies

this is a brilliant idea....
 
Back
Top