Indeed, but how and what you search on google makes a difference as well. I remember my uni professor said, employers don't hire people to memorise stuff but rather they will hire people that will help them solve their problems. Its problem solving skills that is important. Rote learning is not going to get you employed, rather, the ability to utilise google, and find the right answer and application of it that is going to make the difference.
I'm of the belief that the advent of Google search has diminished the value of rote learning substantially. Why should an employer shell out big money to employ expensive human wikipedias if he could get cheap unskilled workers and equip them with working manuals and computers? How much skill does it take to memorise and regurgitate?![]()
[video=youtube;iG9CE55wbtY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG9CE55wbtY[/video]