- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,177
- Points
- 48
I cannot even do my nephew's Primary 5 Maths paper.
I WOULD like to challenge the reasonableness of the current Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) model. Over the years, the PSLE has pushed the bar higher and higher in its expectations of the educational standard of the primary school leaver.
The Ministry of Education has maintained that the PSLE has not become more difficult as they compare the exam papers year on year. However, we need to look deeper into the PSLE curriculum expectations.
The PSLE curriculum expects proficiency in both content acquisition and processing skills. Content requirements have increased over time.
For example, in science, pupils are now tested on the human reproduction system for the PSLE, whereas as late as the 1990s, this topic was introduced at Secondary 3. Likewise, in mathematics, challenging concepts are taught early with the new maths teaching approach.
Higher-order processing skills (making inferences, analysing, evaluating, problem-solving) are routinely tested, expected and valued for all subjects in the PSLE. In the language papers, for example, pupils need to read between the lines to answer comprehension questions.
I disagree that the average 12-year-old is able to meet these challenges breezily.
Pupils need to invest inordinate amounts of time and energy to match up to the curriculum expectations, often just to acquire enough content knowledge and processing skills practice to do reasonably well.
Enough anecdotal evidence has surfaced to indicate that it is challenging for schools to adequately prepare their charges for the exams. Pupils turn to private tuition and extra coaching from enrichment centres to fill the gaps. Interestingly, some schools routinely use materials developed by enrichment centres to supplement their teaching.
As Singapore relooks the PSLE, I appeal for boldness. Let's not simply tweak the system but look long and hard at what needs to change, and implement it.
Marie Tan (Madam)