CNA programme on chat with PM

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Topic supposed to be on the future we want/see in the nexty 20 years.

CNA then runs a survey on "Should pre-school fees be the same".
 
Really dissapointed with the forum.

Forum no focus, no depth, no challenging viewpoints. After viewing and listening, do not know what this is all about.

Shared purpose and aspirations are not even delved in deeply with purpose.:o

Indranee never talk much .:(
 
Really. The forum should be co-ordinated properly.

There was no central theme developedwithout any significant impact. At one instance, audience was asked whether pre-school fees to be maintained? Good grief, what disjointedness viz a viz the central theme.....

After I watch, I really can't grasp what this is all about. Everything touched on but only briefly ....apa ini ??:confused:
 
Really dissapointed with the forum.

Forum no focus, no depth, no challenging viewpoints. After viewing and listening, do not know what this is all about ...
hoi! ...

u tok so much here 4 wat? ... u go n c masuk all ze way la ...
 
... After I watch, I really can't grasp what this is all about. Everything touched on but only briefly ....apa ini ??:confused:
u nid 2 go n grasp melons n touch abalones la ... apa ini? ... :confused:
 
hoi! ...

u tok so much here 4 wat? ... u go n c masuk all ze way la ...

Agree. Should have gone to kranji instead. Wasting time.

I was expecting something deep and substantial. The chat turn out to be disjointed without any impact !!:(
 
Really no substance coupled with disjointedness like headless chicken running in a merry go round. At the end of the day, what did the viewers get out of this. Absolutely nothing, because of the shallowness.:(
 
Agree. Should have gone to kranji instead. Wasting time.

I was expecting something deep and substantial. The chat turn out to be disjointed without any impact !!:(

Kranji War memorial...Kate, balek rumah already!
 
In all seriousness, if I am to grade this programme. It will be 3 or 4 out of 10.

The objective is not even met.

It digresses when some hints of ideas are about to form and develop. Audiences feel like they are slowly supposed to be brought into the mainstream of the talk and suddenly deflates with so much distractions and sudden turns to different topics. This is infuriating to discerned viewers like us.:(
 
In all seriousness, if I am to grade this programme. It will be 3 or 4 out of 10.

The objective is not even met.

It digresses when some hints of ideas are about to form and develop. Audiences feel like they are slowly supposed to be brought into the mainstream of the talk and suddenly deflates with so much distractions and sudden turns to different topics. This is infuriating to discerned viewers like us.:(

You really bother with all these "wayang"?? I am amazed, don't mind me saying so!
 
Don't waste my time. Watching movies and documentaries now and not on the local shit channels.
 
This programme's intention is supposed to be up-lifting going forward as a nation viz a viz the uncertainties of the future. The objective is not met at all. Period.:(
 
This programme's intention is supposed to be up-lifting going forward as a nation viz a viz the uncertainties of the future. The objective is not met at all. Period.:(

I thought you were only interested in skirt lifting?
 
Last edited:
Topic supposed to be on the future we want/see in the nexty 20 years.

watched the program for about 15 minutes, decided to go to Old Airport Road to eat tao huey instead. saw this 老伴 tao huey, many folks eating, so decided to try it. then me realised it is merely overhyped... just a couple of stalls away, another tao huey stall, selling one for one, no one bothers to try. weird isn't it?
 
There were supposed to be 50 participants - but fewer than 10 spoke. And of those who spoke, they were not saying anything we have not heard before.
Except the lady who loved her own voice - went on and on about how she would love to know where her tax money went.

At least the PM did not ask the participants "what do you think?"
 
watched the program for about 15 minutes, decided to go to Old Airport Road to eat tao huey instead. saw this 老伴 tao huey, many folks eating, so decided to try it. then me realised it is merely overhyped... just a couple of stalls away, another tao huey stall, selling one for one, no one bothers to try. weird isn't it?
Tao Huay is hype daft sinkies see queue only go follow herd mentality...knn 51 next door is better than 老伴...
One for one is happy boy....quality also not bad.
 
watched the program for about 15 minutes, decided to go to Old Airport Road to eat tao huey instead. saw this 老伴 tao huey, many folks eating, so decided to try it. then me realised it is merely overhyped... just a couple of stalls away, another tao huey stall, selling one for one, no one bothers to try. weird isn't it?

yeah, over-hyped. there are so many nowadays. Heard they were made from powders, not the traditional way.
 
Really no substance coupled with disjointedness like headless chicken running in a merry go round. At the end of the day, what did the viewers get out of this. Absolutely nothing, because of the shallowness.:(

You are too optimistic bro....expected wayang 换汤不换药
 
Tao Huay is hype daft sinkies see queue only go follow herd mentality...knn 51 next door is better than 老伴...
One for one is happy boy....quality also not bad.

yah, 51 is better than the 老伴, even the bean flower water is better than 老伴.
 
Back
Top