Going by Baba Emperor's Nazi style Eugenics Theory, Jobs will be dismissed as a troublemaker who has too much free time from his LSD and con man antics. Jobs' adoptive parents will probably be penalised based on the regime's doctrines to punish children of wedlock.
Interestingly Jobs character flaws resulted in his silly charges that others committed intellectual banditry, his ideas are the victims but as smarter peasants know it, Jobs stole as much as Google when he took Xerox GUI ideas as his own. At the end of the day, he is simply a wheel dealer who is a parasite on the genius efforts of the serfs around him. Prata Nathan pales in comparison. While Jobs is a swindler (Wozniak an willing victim), Prata Nathan is a traitor who collaborated with the Japs during WWII. Both men however proved the fact that Heaven favour the dishonest and traitors.
How does Ruler Loong measure up to Jobs? Putting aside the glowing reports that Ruler Loong is a genius mathematican (you pay the fees + donations, Cambridge will label you the Messiah) , Jobs is the ultimate acknowledged design engineer who despite his lowly background amassed unearthly wealth of 80 billion peanuts. Ruler Loong on the other hand inherited 80 billion peanuts (based on the US/SGD exchange rate) but on the sweat and toil of 3 million peasants and merchants. Ruler Loong is on the record for having to solve two silly investments incurred by his father and wife (Citibank, UBS). From this alone, Ruler Loong represents Inheritance Wealth based on rent economy as opposed to Jobs' $$ from the sales of real tangible goods.
The famed investor, Gecko Kwa paled in comparison. No Satans will ever imagine Gecko touting iPhones as the good old way to get rich? For Gecko Kwa, it is easier and simpler to get Housing Mafia appoint her legal firm as underwriters of pigeonholes than beat up Google.
Interestingly Jobs character flaws resulted in his silly charges that others committed intellectual banditry, his ideas are the victims but as smarter peasants know it, Jobs stole as much as Google when he took Xerox GUI ideas as his own. At the end of the day, he is simply a wheel dealer who is a parasite on the genius efforts of the serfs around him. Prata Nathan pales in comparison. While Jobs is a swindler (Wozniak an willing victim), Prata Nathan is a traitor who collaborated with the Japs during WWII. Both men however proved the fact that Heaven favour the dishonest and traitors.
How does Ruler Loong measure up to Jobs? Putting aside the glowing reports that Ruler Loong is a genius mathematican (you pay the fees + donations, Cambridge will label you the Messiah) , Jobs is the ultimate acknowledged design engineer who despite his lowly background amassed unearthly wealth of 80 billion peanuts. Ruler Loong on the other hand inherited 80 billion peanuts (based on the US/SGD exchange rate) but on the sweat and toil of 3 million peasants and merchants. Ruler Loong is on the record for having to solve two silly investments incurred by his father and wife (Citibank, UBS). From this alone, Ruler Loong represents Inheritance Wealth based on rent economy as opposed to Jobs' $$ from the sales of real tangible goods.
The famed investor, Gecko Kwa paled in comparison. No Satans will ever imagine Gecko touting iPhones as the good old way to get rich? For Gecko Kwa, it is easier and simpler to get Housing Mafia appoint her legal firm as underwriters of pigeonholes than beat up Google.
