>> From: XXXXXXs sg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Sent: Monday, 18 October 2010 9:04 PM
>> To: Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject: "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
>>
>>
>> Dear Mr Teo,
>>
>> I came across this comment on the internet which I'm sure u will be
>> interested to read.
>>
>> On my part as a citizen of Singapore I am just disgusted at your
>> approcah. Instead of looking at ways and means to help the poor you
>> have resorted to this to raise money. What happened? All the money for
>> the poor gone to foreigners and to pay for the the over budget for
>> the YOG?
>>
>> ABOLUTELY DISGUSTING!
>>
>>
>> Paul
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------------- "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
>>
>> $3mil divide by 24,000 is a petty sum of $125 per resident. Even with
>> 1-1 match from Government, it's $250. I wonder what they expect these
>> citizens to cover with $250?
>>
>> They must think that Singaporeans are bangalas. They give away more
>> than 2000 times that amount to FT at CWG, a minister earns 10,000
>> times that amount and this government overspend 3,000,000 times that
>> amount in a stupid YoG.
>>
>> Is this a government who has your interest and welfare at heart? Is
>> this a government capable of looking after its own citizens?
>>
>> And they say $3mil is a stretch goal... Thank God I'm not Teo Ser
>> Luck, if I'm as incompetent as he is, I would have lost my job.
>>
>> Mr Teo, you donate 1/2 your salary and get each of your MP to donate
>> 20%. You'll hit your goal with the 1-1 matching from Government. Even
>> with 1/2 your salary, you will still live more comfortably than 90% of
>> Singaporeans.
> On 10/18/10, Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> Dont be disgusted. You may not have the full context just by reading
>> the comment.
>> Would you like to give me your number so i can call you to explain
>> since the comment below did not include the full message and context
>> why the district councillors are doing this and what gap we are trying
>> to bridge apart from the existing assistance programmes ?
>>
>> There are so many assistance programmes in CDC and everyday we lend
>> these needy families or individuals a helping hand. Would you like to
>> come observe what we do ? It is an invitation.
>>
>> Just let me know.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Ser Luck
> From: XXXXXX sg [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 October, 2010 3:27 PM
> To: Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)
> Subject: Re: "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
>
> Teo,
>
> I am fully cognisant of the full context. I only sent u part of the numerous
> postings on this issue. I am sure u will have read these.
>
> Are you doing this because you guys overspent the YOG budget by nearly
> 4 times!!. Till to date we as citizens of Singapore have still not received
> a full and proper account. I repeat " full and proper account" for this
> massive budget overrun and how this may be now having an negative impact of
> the MCYS funds available to help the poor people of Singapore.
>
> My disgust grows by the day.
>
> P.
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Message Classification: Unclassified
>
> Paul,
>
> You were discussing about the comment which was on funds for the needy. It
> is about the CDC helping those in need.
>
> In my previous message, I have indicated to provide more info for you and
> also a chance to observe the process and understand the gap we are trying to
> bridge through this amount. 1 to 1 matching is to encourage organizations
> and individuals who are well off to help the less well off and scale up the
> programmes. Sometimes, good ideas come from them too. In the meantime, the
> existing assistance programmes still continues whether these external funds
> are there.
>
> Invitation to you to observe how the different assistance programmes help
> those in need still stands. You can also meet some of the needy families at
> their homes or CCs or CDC offices. This could help you obtain some
> background to the assistance schemes and the needs of these families. We
> see them daily. You may suggest changes to the schemes after and we can
> even discuss the details. Programme outreach and awareness are critical.
>
> You need not be disgusted, really, because believed you have not seen the
> assistance programmes in action and obtain enough info. Give yourself a
> chance to observe and experience 1st.
>
> Regards.
>
> Ser Luck
> From: XXXXXX sg <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 October 2010 11:48 AM
> To: Ser Luck TEO (MCYS) <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
>
> How about this constructive suggestion for you to reach your target of 3m.
>
> As our MM is getting on in age and his health is not good, you could
> persuade him to retire and look after himself as we are all concerned about
> his health. He will also thank you for your kind concern.
>
> By him retiring the goverment will save a few million dollars a year. This
> way you will have alot more money for the needy without asking the
> overstretched Singaporeon to contribure more.....
>
> P.
On 10/20/10, Ser Luck TEO (MCYS) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> 3 million or not, we still need to continue to help those in need and work
> on the ground. Lets discuss about how to help them which was the original
> intent of your email.
>
> Please consider to come, observe and you decide if you want to continue to
> contribute from there. You can also make an assessment on the programmes and
> give suggestion.
>
> Regards.
>
> Ser Luck
from XXXXXX sg <[email protected]>
to "Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)" <[email protected]>
date Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:47 PM
subject "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
mailed-by gmail.com
signed-by gmail.com
hide details 7:47 PM (20 minutes ago)
Teo,
I have already said my piece and made some very good suggestions. I
also asked some very relevant questions.
Unfortunately I have not received any response to any of the above.
I rest my case and will not waste any more time in writing to you.
Suffice to say I am even more disgusted than when I first started.
P.
>> Sent: Monday, 18 October 2010 9:04 PM
>> To: Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject: "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
>>
>>
>> Dear Mr Teo,
>>
>> I came across this comment on the internet which I'm sure u will be
>> interested to read.
>>
>> On my part as a citizen of Singapore I am just disgusted at your
>> approcah. Instead of looking at ways and means to help the poor you
>> have resorted to this to raise money. What happened? All the money for
>> the poor gone to foreigners and to pay for the the over budget for
>> the YOG?
>>
>> ABOLUTELY DISGUSTING!
>>
>>
>> Paul
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------------- "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
>>
>> $3mil divide by 24,000 is a petty sum of $125 per resident. Even with
>> 1-1 match from Government, it's $250. I wonder what they expect these
>> citizens to cover with $250?
>>
>> They must think that Singaporeans are bangalas. They give away more
>> than 2000 times that amount to FT at CWG, a minister earns 10,000
>> times that amount and this government overspend 3,000,000 times that
>> amount in a stupid YoG.
>>
>> Is this a government who has your interest and welfare at heart? Is
>> this a government capable of looking after its own citizens?
>>
>> And they say $3mil is a stretch goal... Thank God I'm not Teo Ser
>> Luck, if I'm as incompetent as he is, I would have lost my job.
>>
>> Mr Teo, you donate 1/2 your salary and get each of your MP to donate
>> 20%. You'll hit your goal with the 1-1 matching from Government. Even
>> with 1/2 your salary, you will still live more comfortably than 90% of
>> Singaporeans.
> On 10/18/10, Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> Dont be disgusted. You may not have the full context just by reading
>> the comment.
>> Would you like to give me your number so i can call you to explain
>> since the comment below did not include the full message and context
>> why the district councillors are doing this and what gap we are trying
>> to bridge apart from the existing assistance programmes ?
>>
>> There are so many assistance programmes in CDC and everyday we lend
>> these needy families or individuals a helping hand. Would you like to
>> come observe what we do ? It is an invitation.
>>
>> Just let me know.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Ser Luck
> From: XXXXXX sg [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 October, 2010 3:27 PM
> To: Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)
> Subject: Re: "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
>
> Teo,
>
> I am fully cognisant of the full context. I only sent u part of the numerous
> postings on this issue. I am sure u will have read these.
>
> Are you doing this because you guys overspent the YOG budget by nearly
> 4 times!!. Till to date we as citizens of Singapore have still not received
> a full and proper account. I repeat " full and proper account" for this
> massive budget overrun and how this may be now having an negative impact of
> the MCYS funds available to help the poor people of Singapore.
>
> My disgust grows by the day.
>
> P.
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Message Classification: Unclassified
>
> Paul,
>
> You were discussing about the comment which was on funds for the needy. It
> is about the CDC helping those in need.
>
> In my previous message, I have indicated to provide more info for you and
> also a chance to observe the process and understand the gap we are trying to
> bridge through this amount. 1 to 1 matching is to encourage organizations
> and individuals who are well off to help the less well off and scale up the
> programmes. Sometimes, good ideas come from them too. In the meantime, the
> existing assistance programmes still continues whether these external funds
> are there.
>
> Invitation to you to observe how the different assistance programmes help
> those in need still stands. You can also meet some of the needy families at
> their homes or CCs or CDC offices. This could help you obtain some
> background to the assistance schemes and the needs of these families. We
> see them daily. You may suggest changes to the schemes after and we can
> even discuss the details. Programme outreach and awareness are critical.
>
> You need not be disgusted, really, because believed you have not seen the
> assistance programmes in action and obtain enough info. Give yourself a
> chance to observe and experience 1st.
>
> Regards.
>
> Ser Luck
> From: XXXXXX sg <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 October 2010 11:48 AM
> To: Ser Luck TEO (MCYS) <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
>
> How about this constructive suggestion for you to reach your target of 3m.
>
> As our MM is getting on in age and his health is not good, you could
> persuade him to retire and look after himself as we are all concerned about
> his health. He will also thank you for your kind concern.
>
> By him retiring the goverment will save a few million dollars a year. This
> way you will have alot more money for the needy without asking the
> overstretched Singaporeon to contribure more.....
>
> P.
On 10/20/10, Ser Luck TEO (MCYS) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> 3 million or not, we still need to continue to help those in need and work
> on the ground. Lets discuss about how to help them which was the original
> intent of your email.
>
> Please consider to come, observe and you decide if you want to continue to
> contribute from there. You can also make an assessment on the programmes and
> give suggestion.
>
> Regards.
>
> Ser Luck
from XXXXXX sg <[email protected]>
to "Ser Luck TEO (MCYS)" <[email protected]>
date Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:47 PM
subject "Mayor":Gahmen no $- Poor Need Sponsors
mailed-by gmail.com
signed-by gmail.com
hide details 7:47 PM (20 minutes ago)
Teo,
I have already said my piece and made some very good suggestions. I
also asked some very relevant questions.
Unfortunately I have not received any response to any of the above.
I rest my case and will not waste any more time in writing to you.
Suffice to say I am even more disgusted than when I first started.
P.
