• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Tan Cheng Bok endorses Nathan !

Khun Ying Pojaman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Tan Cheng Bok during Round-table Discussion:

And I would say we have to really study the roles and responsibilities of the president. Many people think that the president is just going around waving hands and so on. But I read the report, from Nathan's report, I think he's done a lot of things, apart from the ceremonial role, the custodial role and so on.

So is Tan Cheng Bok going to emulate Nathan ? From the look of it, Tan Cheng Bok is the quietest of the 4 candidates.

Almost the whole of Singapore feel Nathan has little to do. Tan Cheng Bok obviously thinks otherwise.
 

Khun Ying Pojaman

Alfrescian
Loyal
And like his usual style, Tan Cheng Bok makes simple things sound complicated but often he is not able to substantiate.

If Nathan has done a lot of things, how come Tan Cheng Bok wasn't able to quote a few examples ? This kind of answer is as good as "many people say" etc. Who are these people ? And for TCB, what are those things ?

Just like he recalled how he believed the information that was presented to him with regard to 1987 detention of ISA detainees, what was the information that was so damning ?

TCB is beginning to sound like the myth teller.
 

jeesus

Alfrescian
Loyal
TCB is a smooth talker. In PAP there will always be some backbencher who speaks against party policies, this is part of the wayang show. TCB happened to be assigned that role, now he is drumming it up as if he had a mind of his own.

Now, through all the interviews his true colours are showing up.

Why do you think he dare not hold a rally? He has no substance.

Why did he not run for president last two PEs against Nathan? Why now? Because he thinks the 4m is ripe for picking....
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
I suspect we may end up with a Chinese Nathan, but at least he will be more popular than the Indian one.

He wants people to trust him to do the right thing, to remember what he has done for Singaporeans as an MP, but how many can really remember him?

Watching him in speak on camera, he seems like a principled man. If he isn't what he claims to be, then perhaps Mediacorp should present him a trophy for the next Star Award.
 

Khun Ying Pojaman

Alfrescian
Loyal
He wants people to trust him to do the right thing, to remember what he has done for Singaporeans as an MP, but how many can really remember him?

We remember him as a PAP MP.

What has he done as a MP ? It's not free, okay ? The citizens of Singapore paid him a very handsome MP allowance.
 

RK85

Alfrescian
Loyal
We remember him as a PAP MP.

What has he done as a MP ? It's not free, okay ? The citizens of Singapore paid him a very handsome MP allowance.

Reference from Wiki:

CPF for Tertiary Education
In 1988, Tan Cheng Bock, as GPC Chairman for Education, led a team of MPs to argue for the use of CPF for education, as an appreciable number of able students were not able to enter local universities due to limited places. Tan felt that education was a form of investment, and that all his GPC was asking for was an extra option for CPF members, to let them decide whether to put their investible savings in stocks and shares or in education. Chief argument against the idea was that the use of such retirement savings may leave the account holder with an insufficient amount at the end of his working life. The Minister for Labour at that time, Lee Yock Suan said that there were alternatives available such as soft loan schemes which were interest free. In answer to Tan's claim that Lee had not clearly stated his position on the issue despite the idea being first mentioned years ago, Lee insisted that his position had always been plain, that he "was against it, but you have pressed me to study it and I shall"[6]. The set of guidelines on the use of CPF for Education proposed by the GPC was eventually implemented, paving the way for the beginnings of a wave of Singaporean students studying at overseas universities

Free parking
Tan also convinced the Ministry of National Development (MND) to let Singaporeans park their cars for free in HDB estates on Sundays and public holidays, to promote family togetherness.

Nominated Member of Parliament Scheme
Tan Cheng Bock actually voted against his own party despite the Whip not lifted (a first in the history of Singapore politics) regarding the NMP scheme, on grounds that MPs had to be elected by the people and be accountable to an electorate for their views. He received a warning for his action.

Think Singaporeans
FirstIn 1999, when the nation was recovering from the Asian Financial Crisis, and experiencing yet labour talent shortages in several key sectors, the PAP pushed for a stronger intake of foreign talent to fill the ranks. Although not against this rationale, Tan Cheng Bock argued that the Government should tone down its calls for the recruitment of foreign talent and reassure Singaporeans that they came first, [9] which earned him strong rebuttals, including one from then Minister of Trade and Industry BG Yeo and a stern rebuke from then Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew.

For this, I'm supporting TCB, even though he is a former PAP man.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
To be fair, perhaps he's trying hard to get the Indian and Malay votes as he is trailing the endorsed candidate. It's not a dealbreaker, just an unusual comment...
 
Top