• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Sinkies Balls Shrinked - DBS UOB OCBC Sexposed by Hin Leong

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
If you ask me, hin leong will be a good fit for petronas,
Petronas have tankers under misc and eagle tankers which they bought from PAP.
And that new refinery in jb will need outlets for its products.
Could this be a good excuse for a temasek take over? Oil prices will go up. And past history has shown us ...when the price rise..it will make huge gains and the losses will be eliminated quickly. The world needs oil. Temasek will buy it on the cheap
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
the wiz of accounting marvel has many ways to deal with this situation ...it all depends on many things .

firstly ,why Hin Leong remained a private limited is quite telling ..had it been a public limited it would have been under Temasek long ago..in short ,the founder was not willing to relinquish centralised management control...had it been a public limited the banks can convert the loans to equity ..overnight the banks becomes shareholders and not lenders.

but being a private ltd ,I am quite certain Lim would have signed personal gurantee as a director but shareholders are usually spared ...so,why is a public limited is different...say,our ex auditor general is appointed as a SIA director and should it go bust ,surely its not fair for him to lose his pants too.

still ,Lim chap will still live very comfortably ..since there are tax havens and secret numbered accounts as in the Switzerland and law firms to show the art of hiding billions and top accounting firms to cook the book creatively ...as a matter of fact ,it was those international accounting firms that managed Najib 1MDB kleptocracy of RM40 billions
Would this be the excuse temasek needs for a take over? N as long as the bosses remain in singkieland. The pap can arm twist them n also give them a graceful exit.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Just the storage tanks alone would cost a few billion if constructed new.
Then you add the vlcc's, and ships plus the oil they have in storage. Who knows.
Temasek could go in n just buy the assets n customer base. N pinky can always tekan the banks to agree. Many companies do that as a buy over. Just makan the assets...happens often in ang mor lands
 

Nice-Gook

Alfrescian
Loyal
Temasek could go in n just buy the assets n customer base. N pinky can always tekan the banks to agree. Many companies do that as a buy over. Just makan the assets...happens often in ang mor lands
i figure the problem lies in being a private ltd ..ex ,how to take possession or dispose shares held in a private ltd ?...unlike public listed cos you cannot trade its shares ...all cos whether pte or public has a constitution article of association..in it its clearly spelt how shares can be disposed and even busineeses it can and cannot do

as it it would take a court order to dispose assets...under receivers who are accountants appointed by the court ...temasek or any co interested in its assetts like tankers and etc are usually auctioned off to the highest bidder ...those who buys are people in the same business..so it doesnt make sense for temasek to buy assets eeven if sold at lalong prices.

co like temasek are interested in ongoing busineeses ..meaning the company must be operative whether making a loss or profit

most importantly the founding family had a centralised management within their family .
like many Chinese family business ...and the buisness will doom without them.

this is the cultural deficits of asian buainess vs ang mor buisness..in short asian buisness where equity holders and managers are the same ..whreas ang mor after some development will hold the shares but manged by professionals
 

Nice-Gook

Alfrescian
Loyal
had a friend who was a liquidator in the than cooper and lybrant..he specialised in liquidation when no body wanted that kind of job in Sinkieland...but when HK had a bad patch in the mid eighties ..he wss tranfered there ...millions of assets came under him and as a liquidator he can even set aside court orders ..hence had some insight how things work ...but things may be lot different now
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
i figure the problem lies in being a private ltd ..ex ,how to take possession or dispose shares held in a private ltd ?...unlike public listed cos you cannot trade its shares ...all cos whether pte or public has a constitution article of association..in it its clearly spelt how shares can be disposed and even busineeses it can and cannot do

as it it would take a court order to dispose assets...under receivers who are accountants appointed by the court ...temasek or any co interested in its assetts like tankers and etc are usually auctioned off to the highest bidder ...those who buys are people in the same business..so it doesnt make sense for temasek to buy assets eeven if sold at lalong prices.

co like temasek are interested in ongoing busineeses ..meaning the company must be operative whether making a loss or profit

most importantly the founding family had a centralised management within their family .
like many Chinese family business ...and the buisness will doom without them.

this is the cultural deficits of asian buainess vs ang mor buisness..in short asian buisness where equity holders and managers are the same ..whreas ang mor after some development will hold the shares but manged by professionals
Good point. If temasek wants it...it can do wat it can to get it. After all pap will back its move. To me it is a strategic industry n if there is a glc competitor they can take over with arm twisting thanks to pinky. Pinky will also want to protect DBS. N to a certain it is a strategic company too valuable to give up. Singkieland economy hinges on finance, shipping, oil n fuel and property. It's too valuable n strategic a company for pap to not take over.
How an epic gamble exposed the rot inside O.K. Lim's Hin Leong oil trading empire
O.K. Lim revealed he hid more than S$1.14 billion in losses speculating in oil futures.
O.K. Lim revealed he hid more than S$1.14 billion in losses speculating in oil futures.PHOTO: BUSINESS TIMES
Published
11 hours ago
SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) - The letters started to arrive in early April. One after the other, the titans of global finance, from JPMorgan Chase & Co to HSBC Holdings, demanded the immediate and urgent repayment of hundreds of millions of dollars in loans.
On the receiving end was Hin Leong, one of the most powerful and secretive names in oil trading. Founded in 1963 by a Chinese immigrant known to everyone in the industry as O.K. Lim, it was a giant in the world of shipping fuel from its base in Singapore.
Over the decades, it had become one of the most fabled trading houses, the source of a billion-dollar fortune, and the subject of stories about legendary deals that made rivals sweat. But earlier this month, as oil prices collapsed in the fallout from the coronavirus, its foundations crumbled.
Banks had already been pulling credit lines, spooked by defaults at other trading houses. Smelling something wrong at Hin Leong, they started to ask for their money. When it failed to repay promptly, they called in their lawyers, and the game was up.
O.K. Lim, known formally as Lim Oon Kuin, has fallen on his sword, revealing he hid more than US$800 million (S$1.14 billion) in losses speculating in oil futures over the years. Worse still for the banks, Mr Lim said he had secretly sold some of the million of barrels of oil inventories the company had pledged as collateral for its loans. The gap between the company's assets and its liabilities stands at US$3.34 billion.
The Singapore police force is now investigating the company while the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the nation's financial regulator and central bank, has been in contact with Hin Leong's bank creditors, according to people familiar with the matter.
The closely knit trading community in Singapore, where players bet hundreds of millions of dollars every day on the price of oil, is in shock at the downfall of one of its biggest names. Hin Leong, which means "prosperity" in Chinese, sought protection from its creditors in Singapore last Friday (April 17). Having spent decades keeping the inner workings of his company secret, Mr Lim came clean in a startling mea culpa.
"I had given instructions to the finance department to prepare the accounts without showing the losses and told them that I would be responsible if anything went wrong," Mr Lim said in an affidavit seen by Bloomberg News. Although Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd's official accounts showed a profit of US$78 million in its 2019 fiscal year, "in truth", Mr Lim explained, the company "has not been making profits in the last few years".
The rise and fall of Hin Leong is a tale of humble beginnings, business acumen, and luck. But above all, it shows that Mr Lim, a keen poker player according to those who know him, was willing to bet, and bet big, in the loosely regulated and opaque world of oil trading. This month, he lost his biggest hand.
"Hin Leong is a company that likes risk," said Mr Jorge Montepeque, a veteran oil market executive who knows Mr Lim. "But this time the risk became too big."
This account of the trading house and its founding family is based on interviews with business associates, rivals, bankers and consultants, plus presentations to creditors and affidavits made by the founder and his son in support of court applications. While some of the people spoke publicly, most asked not to be named because the sensitivity of the situation.
Multiple attempts by phone and e-mail to reach Mr Lim, members of his family or officials from his companies for comment were unsuccessful.
HUGE CONSEQUENCES
The demise of Hin Leong has far-reaching repercussions for a market that literally fuels global trade. Singapore is the world's biggest hub for shipping fuel. The trading house's bunkering unit was the third-largest supplier in the city last year, according to the Maritime and Port Authority.
Thanks to its unique position straddling the sea lanes that connect China to the rest of the world, Singapore has become one of the world's top commodity trading hubs, alongside Geneva, London and Houston.
"Hin Leong was instrumental in helping the growth of Singapore as an oil hub and bunkering location," said Mr Jean-Francois Lambert, a commodity industry consultant and former trade finance banker with HSBC.
The crisis is the latest in a series of scandals to tarnish the reputation of the island-state, including multi-million dollar losses by some high profile Chinese and Japanese traders, the collapse of Noble Group, one of the biggest names in the industry, and the more recent implosion of Agritrade International.
This time, the trigger was a global calamity that nobody saw coming. World oil prices fell by two-thirds between early January and the end of March, crushed by plummeting demand due to the coronavirus outbreak and a price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia. They have since collapsed below zero in the United States for the first time ever.
NO HEDGES
Unfortunately for Hin Leong, it wasn't hedged against a price rout. In fact, Mr Lim had made the opposite bet, believing China would control the virus and oil demand would recover from its initial slump triggered by the country's virtual shutdown, according to people who discussed the outlook in meetings and phone calls.
Whether it was an attempt to get out of hidden losses, or something else, the fact is that Mr Lim bet that prices were about to rise. It was a gamble against all the odds, a wager that almost everyone else in the industry was wrong. In many ways, it was the quintessential Hin Leong play: bold and aggressive.
The tycoon was right to a degree; Beijing did manage to bring the outbreak under control and oil demand in China gradually started to recover in March. But what Mr Lim failed to predict was how the disease would eventually become a global pandemic and bring the world to a standstill.
Brent crude, the global benchmark, plunged from more than US$70 a barrel in early January to just US$21.65 a barrel in late March. As prices crashed, Hin Leong's banks asked for more and more money to cover the bullish bets that it had placed. What's more, the value of the company's inventories was rapidly shrinking as prices dropped, meaning Hin Leong needed to mortgage more barrels to maintain its credit lines.
The situation unraveled as Hin Leong all but ran out of cash. When the company's bankers started to pull their credit lines, it could no longer function.
TRADING LIFEBLOOD
Bank financing in the form of letters of credit and other short-term loans is the cornerstone of the opaque world of commodity trading, enabling firms to buy, store and transport raw materials around the world. Traders use their cargoes and other assets as collateral for the credit lines and if they fail to repay, the bank can seize the goods. But in the case of Hin Leong, it appears most of the barrels are already gone.
The company now owes some US$3.85 billion to 23 lenders, including HSBC, Societe Generale, Standard Chartered and Deutsche Bank, according to people with knowledge of the matter. HSBC has the biggest exposure at about US$600 million while Singapore's three biggest lenders are owed a combined US$500 million or thereabouts.
The banks held a virtual meeting with the oil trader and its advisers on April 14, the people said. During the call, the company told them that its liabilities stood at US$4.05 billion as of April 9, while its assets were only US$714 million. The massive US$3.34 billion difference suggests banks may recover only 18 cents on the dollar, a staggering loss in the business of financing commodity trade.
The accounts that Hin Leong has provided also contain clauses that suggest more nasty surprises could emerge. "Figures obtained from the company are subject to verification," it warned in a presentation to its creditors, according to a screenshot seen by Bloomberg News.
RISKY BUSINESS
The legal documents filed by Mr Lim also shed light on how risky the business model was. Most physical oil traders hedge their positions using derivatives such as futures, options and swaps. But Hin Leong didn't. As a matter of policy, the company "did not hedge aggressively", Mr Lim said in his affidavit.
It's a business model the company has employed with gusto over decades. Often making money when prices moved in the right direction; but often also getting hurt, as the founder's son Evan Lim put it in a rare interview more than 25 years ago. "On one occasion we agreed to buy 800,000 barrels for delivery with a five-day pricing window," the younger Lim told Bloomberg News in 1994. "We got burned badly because the seller was in the market pushing prices up."
Hin Leong trades a range of oil products, makes lubricants and operates loading terminals and storage facilities. Its affiliated company has a fleet of more than 100 ships that supply fuel to commercial vessels at anchor offshore.
The company doesn't have to file financial statements because of its classification as "an exempt private company" with fewer than 20 members and does not have any corporations holding beneficial interest in its shares. It declared revenue of more than US$20 billion in its 2019 financial year.
HUMBLE START
The company has humble beginnings. Mr O.K. Lim started off with little more than a fishing boat supplying diesel to other vessels. More comfortable speaking his native dialect of Hokkien than English or Mandarin, he was one of the first traders outside China to start doing business with the mainland, shipping fuel to southern Chinese provinces since the 1980s.
Hin Leong grew in parallel with Asia's recovery after the 1997-98 economic crisis. As Indonesia, Malaysia and others rebounded, so did demand for diesel and fuel oil, the staples in which Hin Leong traded. When China's growth accelerated over the following decades, more ships stopped in Singapore to take on fuel, and Hin Leong became a giant of the industry, an empire with stakes in an oil terminal and tanks capable of holding millions of barrels of oil.
Its domination of the market gave rise to the quip that anyone wanting to start a ship fuel business in Singapore had better get an "OK" from Mr Lim's company. His trading plays, often bullish, and more often than not targeting either fuel oil or diesel became the stuff of legend in the city. While others stumbled, Mr Lim appeared to always persevere.
LOW-KEY
Associates who've known Mr Lim for more than three decades described him as a humble, low-key businessman, who remained true to his origins. In Singapore, he is said to like dining at Putien, a chain restaurant named after his hometown of Putian in China's Fujian province, that serves his favorite fish dish, "100-second" stewed yellow croaker, for $14.90.
"A man of his mindset and character, I doubt whether he would sit and bury his head in the sand," said Mr Robson Lee, a Singapore-based partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, who is acquainted with business of the Lim family. "He will try to navigate his way out."
And perhaps that's what Mr Lim is now trying to achieve, according to two people involved in the talks involving the banks, consultants and the company. By taking all the blame on himself, he could be attempting to distance the collapsing business he founded and other assets controlled by his family, notably the giant oil tanker business Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd.
The trading house has appointed accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Singaporean law firm Rajah & Tann as advisers. Mr Lim told creditors he's already in talks with a Chinese entity for a deal to rescue his company. He resigned last Friday, but said he hopes his children, committed to rescuing the family company, will remain involved.
In his own affidavit, Mr Evan Lim claimed he was unaware of his father's actions or the reason for its losses. A spokesman for Rajah & Tann, which is advising Hin Leong, said it's unable to comment because the matter is before the court. PwC didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Like other governments around the world, Singapore is trying to help businesses struggling from the effects of the coronavirus. In the past, the country has used the financial muscle of its investment agencies to bail out home-grown traders like Olam International when they were in financial distress.
Whether it can or wants to engineer a solution for Hin Leong remains to be seen. The losses appear larger than before, and the foreign banks are unlikely to turn a blind eye to a company whose founder has all but admitted to cooking the books for years.
Introductory Offer at $0.99/month
Unlock all Premium articles and discover exclusive stories, in-depth analysis, award-winning multimedia content and more. Cancel anytime.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Police investigating debt-laden oil trader Hin Leong Trading: What we know so far
Besides oil trading, Hin Leong also has operations across terminal and storage, bunker supply, lubricants manufacturing and inland transportation services. (Photo: Hin Leong's website)Bookmark
SINGAPORE: The Singapore police have begun investigating Hin Leong Trading after the home-grown oil trader filed for bankruptcy protection amid a startling revelation from its billionaire founder that the firm had failed to disclose hundreds of millions in losses over several years.
One of the country’s largest independent oil trader, Hin Leong, which means “prosperity” in Chinese, is now struggling to repay debts of US$3.85 billion (S$5.49 billion).
Hin Leong and its shipping arm Ocean Tankers are seeking a six-month moratorium, according to filings to the Singapore court, which also threw up the admission from founder Lim Oon Kuin that he had directed the firm to hide nearly US$800 million in losses from speculating oil futures over the years.
In the latest development on Tuesday (Apr 21), the police confirmed that “investigations are ongoing” into the debt-laden firm, although it did not elaborate on the nature or scope of its investigations.
ABOUT THE COMPANY
Hin Leong was founded in 1963 by Mr Lim, who came to Singapore from the Chinese province of Fujian.
It started out as a one-man-one-truck supplier of diesel to small fishing vessels before growing into one of the region’s biggest names, with operations across oil trading, terminal and storage, bunker supply, lubricants manufacturing and inland transportation services.
Hin Leong started off as a one-man-one-truck oil dealer before becoming one of Singapore's biggest independent oil trading companies. (Photo: Hin Leong's website)
According to its website, Hin Leong’s Ocean Tankers owns and operates more than 130 vessels, while its bunkering arm, Ocean Bunkering Services, is one of Singapore's largest marine fuel suppliers.
It also partly owns Universal Terminal, a commercial storage facility on Singapore's Jurong Island.
As the company grew, so did the fortunes of Mr Lim or better known in the business world as “O K Lim”.
The 76-year-old was ranked 18th on Forbes’ list of Singapore’s richest people in 2019, with an estimated net worth of US$1.65 billion. A Forbes article on Apr 20 said it no longer considered Lim as a billionaire following the company’s bankruptcy filing and admission of sustained losses.
Hin Leong was founded in 1963 by Lim Oon Kuin. (Photo: Hin Leong's website)
WHAT HAPPENED
Concerns about Hin Leong’s finances emerged early this month with a report that said some lenders had freeze credit lines to the firm.
At least two banks will not issue new letters of credit citing concerns about the firm’s ability to repay debt, said the report by Bloomberg on Apr 9. That week, the company appointed accounting firm PwC and law firm Rajah & Tann as its advisers to help negotiate with banks.
Letters of credit are used to guarantee payment to a supplier for the purchase of goods. These are issued by the banks on behalf of the buyer who repays the banks once the goods have exchanged hands.
Letters of credit are critical trade finance instruments for the likes of Hin Leong as a way of financing short-term trade.
The company held talks with its lenders on Apr 14 but was not able to reach an agreement, according to various media reports. Hin Leong filed for a debt moratorium, which would grant it protection from creditors, on Apr 17.
An affidavit signed by Mr Lim cited the dramatic collapse in global oil prices – brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and a price war among the oil majors – and a lack of hedging policies among factors behind the company’s financial distress.
A tightening of credit lines and margin calls by banks also caused a “severe depletion” of the company’s cash reserves, Reuters cited Mr Lim as saying in the affidavit.
WATCH: Oil trading and bunkering sectors face slump in demand, say experts | Video
The affidavit also disclosed how the company “suffered about US$800 million in futures losses over the years but these were not reflected in the financial statements”.
“In this regard, I had given instructions to the finance department to prepare the accounts without showing the losses and told them that I would be responsible if anything went wrong,” Mr Lim had said, adding that the company “has not been making profits in the last few years” despite its financial statements for the 2019 fiscal year reporting a net profit of US$78 million.
The affidavit, which said Mr Lim was resigning immediately as director of the family-held company, did not specify over how many years the losses were incurred.
CIMB economist Song Seng Wun said: “This is a case about checks and balances within the company, as well as the collapse in the energy market brought about COVID-19.
“The very sharp fall in energy prices over a very short period of time compounded the losses and it basically forced the company’s hand.”
An analysis by S&P Global Platts said the woes of Hin Leong confirmed two key concerns - commodity financing curbs and wider industry losses on the back of plunging oil prices.
“Banks were already pulling back from financing oil and gas trades after the oil price crash, with credit shortages due to the coronavirus outbreak percolating into the commodity business more widely than expected,” it said.
“Undisclosed industry losses among commodity traders and oil companies already run into several billions of dollars that could still trigger more defaults and bankruptcies, especially among smaller traders with poor hedging and financing options."
The analysis also described the drop in demand due to the COVID-19 outbreak as the “nail in the coffin”, which left Hin Leong “with unsaleable fuel worth half the original price”.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
the wiz of accounting marvel has many ways to deal with this situation ...it all depends on many things .

firstly ,why Hin Leong remained a private limited is quite telling ..had it been a public limited it would have been under Temasek long ago..in short ,the founder was not willing to relinquish centralised management control...had it been a public limited the banks can convert the loans to equity ..overnight the banks becomes shareholders and not lenders.

but being a private ltd ,I am quite certain Lim would have signed personal gurantee as a director but shareholders are usually spared ...so,why is a public limited is different...say,our ex auditor general is appointed as a SIA director and should it go bust ,surely its not fair for him to lose his pants too.

still ,Lim chap will still live very comfortably ..since there are tax havens and secret numbered accounts as in the Switzerland and law firms to show the art of hiding billions and top accounting firms to cook the book creatively ...as a matter of fact ,it was those international accounting firms that managed Najib 1MDB kleptocracy of RM40 billions
The company had losses for a few years... but manage to hide it. The external auditors need to be fined n locked up n licence revoked. Isnt there a rule that external auditors need to be changed to prevent an Enron type scandal? How did the external auditors not do their job?
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The company had losses for a few years... but manage to hide it. The external auditors need to be fined n locked up n licence revoked. Isnt there a rule that external auditors need to be changed to prevent an Enron type scandal? How did the external auditors not do their job?
Ya la already reading the market wrong for years.
Bet on China haha lose your pants serves him right....what astute trader? Kns kena cleaned out.
 

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
Exactly ... alot of people forget his company name - Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd
What headache ? Its a private limited company. It is the Bank that is balls shrink !


Banks got very short memories.

Abalone King case. Baring Bank Case. Colour Touch Case . Khameleon : The Elyamani Khamis case ...and so on...

now.. Lim O.K. case - The Legendary Trader turned Celebrity " Cook " ... i mean cooking
the Books...

IMG_20200422_013108.jpg


IMG_20200422_013615.jpg
 

Nice-Gook

Alfrescian
Loyal
External auditors to blame. Will pap throw the book at them?

a couple of things to note ...external Auditors is a must for all Pte and public Ltd via...in essence it was made mandatory to protect the public by evaluating of the state of a company by independent entities ....but the big question is how can an independent auditor remain independent if he depends on the company to pay for the work done ?thus lies the problem of cooking the books or Creative accounting as it’s called

now both the Co director and independent auditors play this game...for eg,say you are a typical ah Peh co who made millions in a fiscal year .,,the auditor will know and strike a bargain with the ah Pek , how he can cook the book to show a lot less or even a loss...for which the auditor will charge a leg and arms...sometimes ,the auditor even can fix you up and threaten you for more money ..this is the game played every fiscal year of a company

than there are directors of companies who can falsify or show documents to Auditors misleading them ...if anyone is familiar with the principle of accounting will know this ..one are a company can play punk is in the Stocks ...it can be over valued or undervalued or even falsified ...two things to note ...say NTUC tender documents to Auditors it carries X amount of stocks at the close of accounting period ,we cannot expect the Auditors physically to go and count its stock and tally thus the author must accept documents on face value ...there are many ways to skin the cat so as to say

again this game of cooking the book is not only played by the companies but everybody including the government and even economist ...for example let say our GDP is 5% last year and the government must show an improvement this year to win election ...than what it does is do a different alogaritthum to calculate ...just like say our government does including PR or new citizens with local born to say more are employed than foreigners whreas from our point of view more foreigners are employed than locals since PR can be handed to a person anytime any day

these days you simply cannot trust any figures ...you need a mind of your own
 
Top