• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Roy Felt Raped While Investigated For Breaking The 'Cooling Day' Laws! 30% Where?

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Roy-Ngerng-Joel-Lazarus-interview-650x440.jpg


Roy Ngerng, a well-known political blogger who made news with his CPF articles and defamation suit with the Prime Minister of Singapore, was one of the two individuals who were called to assist the police in investigation of alleged violation of the Cooling Off Day regulations at the Cantonment Police Station, around 10am on Tuesday.

After a two hour interview with the police, instead of being allowed to go. Ngerng was escorted by three policemen back to his home and the police searched his residence without a search warrant. When the search was completed, the police took away 2 laptops, 2 harddisk, memory cards and his mobile phone.

Ngerng was brought back to the police station again for questioning before being released at around 6pm

On 27 May, the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) released a statement about the filing of police reports by the Assistant Returning Officer from the Elections Department (ELD) against socio-political site, The Independent Singapore (TISG), and two individuals, Teo Soh Lung and Roy Ngerng.

The unnamed Assistant Returning Officer filed the reports due to the publishing of "several online articles and postings that may be tantamount to election advertising, on Cooling-Off Day and Polling Day of the recent Bukit Batok by-election".

In a post that Ngerng made after his interview session with the police, he shared what went on during the interview and wrote that the police took 14 posts on Facebook and his blog to question him. He noted that were posts completely unrelated to the by-election. He said that one was on the funding update for the defamation suit that he faced from PM Lee Hsien Loong and the other was on thoughts about how tax should be calculated in Singapore. He also poured out his thoughts after his ordeal and how this and other matters have affected his family.

Below is Ngerng's full post on his Facebook account.

Got home only just. Spent nearly 8 hours being interrogated and held by the police today. Have not had a proper meal yet.

Was at the police station at 10am. Left close to 6pm.

Police took out 14 posts on Facebook and blog to question me.

But there were posts completely unrelated to the election. One was on the funding update for the defamation suit that I faced from the Singapore prime minister. Another was just thoughts about how tax should be calculated in Singapore.

The Election Department reported that I posted articles on the day before election - which to let my foreign friends know, is illegal in Singapore.

But personal views are allowed. Still, I am being investigated for posting my personal views.

The police told me a few times this is an arrestable crime and I could be arrested. I heard they threatened to arrest Soh Lung - the other lady being investigated with me.

When I thought I was done, several police officers surrounded me. I was to be brought home. They were going to "raid" my home, I was told.

My phone was taken away from me.

When I wanted to speak to Jeanette - the lawyer who was representing Soh Lung, they refused to let me. And dragged me away.

I insisted I wanted to know my rights and whether it was legal for them to do what they were doing. They would not let me speak to Jeanette.

My mom was at home when the police came. She was in shock. I have never seen my mom so traumatised before.

I do not remember how long the police were there. Two activist friends came to check on me. The police would not let them into my home.

When the police finished the raid and I had to head back to the police station, the police pulled me away before I could speak to my friends further more.

I was told that after I left, my mom broke down. My sister said my mom could not take it. She did not know how to handle things anymore. Mom has been trying too hard to put up a brave front for these 2 years since the government has been attacking me.

What can I do at that point? For being a useless and unfilial son?


Mom made me some oat to drink before I left again. When the policeman asked me what I ate, I told him it was a mother's love from her broken heart.

I told him - I stood up for justice and I lost my job. What did you lose?

It is very tiring. You fought so hard for equality. And who cares?

I spent nearly 8 hours with the police. I was not scared. Because my conscience is clear. But I kept thinking - why am I being investigated for a crime that I did not do - that should not even be a crime?

When I got back to the police station, the police told me that they wanted my all my passwords to access my phone, my laptop, and my Facebook and my WordPress accounts.

I asked why. They said it was because they wanted to check the IP address. They wanted to be sure I was the only person operating the account.

Funny, the government does not believe that just with one person, I can write nearly 700 articles on my blog and exposed how the government was taking our CPF pension funds to let GIC without telling Singaporeans?

I must be really honoured.

The police downloaded the archives from my Facebook. I overheard that Facebook taught them how to read the archives.

I asked them what they would do with my phone. They practically have access to my whole phone now and can access everything.

I have no more privacy.

I am angry. But tired. Exhausted. Sad. It is mixed emotions.

When I left the police station, I did not know what to feel.

I was reminded of what a PAP MP shared on his Facebook - democracy is like gang rape in action.

I felt raped. I felt raped when the police surrounded me to raid my home. I felt raped when they did not let me speak to my friends. I felt raped when the police searched all my devices and accounts in front of me. I felt like I was stripped and searched.

I lost my dignity, even as I tried hard to maintain it.

Having said that, most of the officers I met were nice enough. But one was not and was throwing his weight around. But I told the police - I do not hate them. They are doing their job. Singapore needs them for the real crimes. But it is in times like this, that I wonder if the police still remembers why they joined the police force for - to bully and intimidate or to protect people like me?

I have not eaten a proper meal until now. I told the police I wanted to get the interrogation over and done with quickly and did not want to eat. I did not know it would drag on for so long.

One policeman brought me two bars of cake. I thanked him but I did not eat them. He asked me why.

I said I do not trust this place. I do not trust what they would put in the food they give. They gave me two mineral water bottles. I did not dare to drink them. I did not trust the place, I said.

I told them - I have learnt not to trust because of what the PAP has done to me.

The police said - but we are nonpartisan.

Yeah, but the PAP makes use of you sometimes, I said. (PAP is the ruling party in government for the past 60 or so in Singapore, for those of you who do not know).

When I needed to go to the toilet about 5 or 6 times throughout the day, the police would stand watch over me like I am hardened criminal. They did this even when they raided my home. Imagine this - being guarded in your own home.

I stood my ground today but I did not know my rights, I did not know if what the police did was right or legal. I was pushed and pulled around.

I understand Soh Lung did not want to give her phone and laptop and asked for a search warrant. But the police threatened to arrest her.

Is this the kind of state we are in now - where we have to fear the very law and people who are supposed to protect us?

I am finally going to eat my first proper meal now. I am tired.

I wonder why I am doing all this. I am fighting for justice but it is tiring carrying the burden on my shoulders, alone.

When I stood my ground and faced the fire, I realise only I was there.

We want justice and equality for this country but we let just one person fight for it.

I asked the police - is your conscience pricked?

Is it?

I am sorry, mom and dad. I have let you down. I tried to be brave but what have I done to you? Have I done my duty to you as a son?

But it is not over yet. Tomorrow, I have to pay the prime minister the next installment for the defamation suit. I have to pay him S$180,000. And I still do not know if I will be charged for this "crime".

I told an activist who met me when I came out of the police station, that finally today has ended. He joked in a half-serious manner and said it has only just begun.

Perhaps, it has, the rot to our nation.

http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/201...thoughts-after-8-hour-ordeal-with-the-police/
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Playing the Martyr or the victim does not work. You have to attack the PAP on facts and there are many. Make it very clear that it was your personal view and the bloody law is so unclear that the Elections Dept had to come up with guidelines. This guidelines and the written piece of legislation have little correlation. Any sane person would take it as a personal view.

Pointless talking about not having your meal, your mother crying, your friends not allowed in the house, you cannot contact your lawyer, mentioning your foreign friends. These things are meant to milk the human emotions of the gullible. For heaven sake, they were with you from 10am to 6pm, that is not even a full day shift for many workers who have toil to make ends meet. Yet this has been spinned to near Mandela proportions.

Singapore, Malaysia and many other countries do not allow access to lawyers until the completion of investigation or until someone is released on bail. That has been the law from day one, nothing has changed. These statements only work for those who watch American TV shows and 1st world foreigners.

He needs to man up, be strong and firm. Not appear like a weak kuniang, pleading for mercy, and please don't ask for any further donations. Get a job.

When Alex Au was investigated, charged and convicted for taking on the judiciary, not ones did he talk about his father or mother, starving, people crying, not allowed to see the lawyer, having being raped and he never did ask for donations. This whole thing is embarrassing.
 
Last edited:

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/201...-raid-of-7-8-officers-without-search-warrant/
Teo Soh Lung visibly shaken from police house raid of 7-8 officers without search warrant 0
BY TERRY XU ON JUNE 1, 2016 CURRENT AFFAIRS
Teo Soh Lung, a lawyer and former Internal Security Act (ISA) detainee under the Operation Spectrum in 1987, was one of the two individuals who were called to assist the police in the investigation of alleged violation of the Cooling Off Day regulations at the Cantonment Police Station, around 10am on Tuesday.

Teo said that the police questioned her about her Facebook post made on Cooling Off Day, asking about the number of likes, who her visitors are, what she usually posts about, whether she thinks her post can influence the way people vote. Teo told the police that the Parliamentary Elections Act applies to political parties and candidates, not citizens like her, who have a constitutional right to post what they like on Facebook.

Instead of being allowed to leave the police station following her 2-hour interview, Teo was escorted by 7-8 police officers back to her residence to search for evidence relating to her alleged offence.

About five friends were there at her residence, accompanying Teo when the officers went through her belongings without a search warrant.

Lawyer, Remy Choo recalled his experience of the incident as he arrived at Teo's residence on Tuesday at about 2.20 p.m. He wrote that 7 - 8 police officers were in the midst of seizing her handphone, desktop and laptop when he arrived.

The investigating officer (IO) Angie Ng was asked about why the police had to seize her electronic devices given that Teo is not disputing the publication of the articles on her personal Facebook page on cooling off day.

Choo further pointed that Teo was willing to cooperate with the police by giving them all necessary information relating to the offence under the Parliamentary Elections Act which was being investigated.

The response from the IO was, "this is an arrestable offence, and we do not need to tell you how we conduct our investigations".

After pointing out politely but firmly that it was disproportionate to seize her personal electronic devices which contained personal data, another officer mentioned to Choo that he could be charged with obstructing investigations.

At the end of the search, the police seized one desktop, one laptop and one mobile phone belonging to Teo. The police said that Teo was not required to follow them back to the station. Ngerng, who also had his residence raided, had to follow the police back to the station.

Choo noted that Teo was visibly shaken by the entire spectacle. She was particularly upset that the police had to take her laptop, which had nothing related to the Facebook posts on it.

Choo commented on his Facebook post,

"I was disappointed with the police action. The seizure of a person's electronic devices is gravely disruptive to their personal lives, and that these devices contain large amounts of personal private data irrelevant to the investigation. I would have thought the police could give a proper explanation as to why they needed to go to such extremes, especially given the fact that these are essentially "political" offences under the Parliamentary Elections Act.

Soh Lung is a fiercely passionate social and political activist, but why must she be treated like a criminal, hell bent on concealing evidence from the police? She's a former practicing lawyer and council member of the Law Society!"

Choo also said that he has written to the police to ask that her electronic devices be returned as soon as possible, upon her provision of any information or material which is relevant to investigations which he believes to be a reasonable request and should be acceded to.

He further noted that there was no such extreme action being taken against politicians who were alleged to have breached cooling off day regulations and asked the need to use such a heavy hand against individuals posting on their personal Facebook pages.

Some individuals have speculated that the seizure of the personal electronic devices may be part of a fishing expedition by the authorities to seek out "incriminating" information that might lead to other charges.

Read : Stark contrast in police enforcement of Cooling Off Day regulations

Under the Parliamentary Election Act, any person who is found guilty of violating the cooling off day regulation will be fined for a sum of not exceeding $1,000 or to imprisoned for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is why peasant sinkies shouldnt engage in politics,just a little police investigation and they break down and traumatised.if this was india they would be engaged in court battles,if this was America the whole fanily would be engaged in gun fight with the police.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.byline.com/column/23/article/1073
WHEN THE POLICE GETS HOLD OF YOUR FACEBOOK
Kirsten Han photo Kirsten HanSingapore31 May 2016
When the police gets hold of your Facebook
A police investigation into the alleged breach of election rules in Singapore led to raids on the homes of two Singaporean activists, and the seizure of their electronic devices.
When activists Roy Ngerng and Teo Soh Lung reported to the police headquarters on Wednesday morning, they were probably only expecting a boring interview with the cops, answering questions related to the police report lodged by the Elections Department, accusing them of breaching laws related to election advertising on the eve of Polling Day, also known as 'Cooling-Off Day'.
According to these rules, election advertising is banned so that voters can have a day to consider their options away from the barrage of slogans, rallies and promises, before making their choice the next day. Online news websites – the source of most 'independent' or 'alternative' news in Singapore – are also expected to go silent. The mainstream media, however, widely known to be under the influence of the government in a country ranked 154 in Reporters Without Borders' Press Freedom Index, is allowed to carry on publishing.
The law, though, does state that "the telephonic or electronic transmission by an individual to another individual of the first-mentioned individual’s own political views, on a noncommercial basis", making it baffling that two individuals like Ngerng and Teo could be accused of having been in breach. The only explanation the Elections Department could come up with was that both individuals "regularly engage in the propagation, promotion and discussion of political issues" – more a descriptor of citizens exercising their rights rather than an incriminating statement.
Still, Ngerng and Teo presented themselves at the Cantonment Police Complex on Tuesday morning for questioning, as requested by the authorities. Questions were asked regarding specific social media posts: how many 'likes' it received, whether it was a private or public post, whether they felt that the posts put the opposition candidate running in Bukit Batok in a good light, whether they felt that their posts would influence voters' decisions. Some of these questions were silly: with the specific posts downloaded and presented as evidence, the police could clearly see for themselves whether it was public or private, and how many 'likes' it had garnered.
"I told them I am nobody, I'm not prime minister or anything, I don't know if I influence people's votes," Teo told me. "If I was so powerful the SDP [Singapore Democratic Party] would have won already." [The Singapore Democratic Party lost to the incumbent People's Action Party by over 20 per cent of the vote.]
But the investigation did not end with their interrogations. The police then informed them that they would have to hand over their mobile phone, and that their homes would be raided. When Teo refused to hand over her mobile phone, she was threatened with arrest. Ngerng wanted to speak with a lawyer who had shown up to advise Teo of her rights, but was not allowed to do so.

Seven police officers searched the home in which Teo lives alone. Her desktop, laptop and mobile phone were seized. Meanwhile, Ngerng's two laptops, two hard drives, mobile phone and some memory cards were also confiscated at his home. There was no search warrant or warrant to seize; the police said that there was no need for such warrants as it was all part of the investigation process.
When another lawyer questioned the proportionality of seizing Teo's property, he was told her could be charged for obstructing the investigation.
"I do not remember how long the police were there," Ngerng wrote on his Facebook page. "Two activist friends came to check on me. The police would not let them into my home."
Teo was released from custody, sans electronics, following the search, and remained at home. Ngerng, however, was brought back to Cantonment Police Complex where he was made to access his Facebook account and hand over his passwords to his phone, laptop, Facebook and WordPress accounts. His Facebook archive and activity log was downloaded.
"They pretty much have complete access to my phone. I’m not sure what they’re going to do with the access to my phone," he told me.
The police now have access to both Ngerng and Teo's electronic data. They can see emails, chat logs, WhatsApp and text conversations. They can look up what has been to said to other activists about any of the causes both individuals were working on. As fishing expeditions go – and Ngerng said the police had asked him not just about Cooling-Off Day posts, but other blog posts completely unrelated to the police report filed by the Elections Department – this has been a pretty successful one.
The episode has been condemned by civil society groups such as the Community Action Network (CAN) and Function8, of which Teo is a founding member.
"The police have clearly abused their power of investigation even though both Roy and Soh Lung had never denied, and indeed confirmed at the interview, that they had commented on, and shared postings on Facebook which had been made by others," said Function8 in its statement.
"In our view, it is part of a chain of recent incidents that encroach upon work of civil society which contribute to the legitimate exercise of good citizenship," they added.
"This is police harassment; as Singaporean citizens Teo and Ngerng are entitled to share their personal opinions on political issues. This should not be treated as suspicious, much less a crime warranting long interrogations and searches," said CAN.
The repercussions of Tuesday's police action stretches far beyond investigating errant Facebook posts. It is a gross violation of the privacy of Ngerng and Teo, as well as everyone recorded in their chat logs (full disclosure: I am likely to be one of them).
And it affects all Singaporeans, too. By going to the extreme of raiding homes and seizing property, the authorities are sending a signal that personal opinions on political matters – even party political matters – are dangerous in Singapore, with frightening implications. Some might wonder if the climate of fear could be slowly lifting in the Southeast Asia city-state, but days like these make the chilling effect very real indeed.
 

chongpangchixwings

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Gay Roy wants to go into the kitchen but expects it to be cool and comfortable there. He needs to be of sterner stuff before anyone of note will take him seriously.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I just wish Alex Au is back to his active self. His articles were incisive, accurate and hit the spot every time. The authorities hated it as he was right and they struggle to respond. Siew Kum Hong was also similar.

Not once did he address the issue.

Gay Roy wants to go into the kitchen but expects it to be cool and comfortable there. He needs to be of sterner stuff before anyone of note will take him seriously.
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
This is a fucking example of a political backward country.. what a fucking sinkie disgrace!!!!
 

cuckoldoolittle

Alfrescian
Loyal
On 27 May, the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) released a statement about the filing of police reports by the Assistant Returning Officer from the Elections Department (ELD) against socio-political site, The Independent Singapore (TISG), and two individuals, Teo Soh Lung and Roy Ngerng.

The unnamed Assistant Returning Officer filed the reports due to the publishing of "several online articles and postings that may be tantamount to election advertising, on Cooling-Off Day and Polling Day of the recent Bukit Batok by-election".

In a post that Ngerng made after his interview session with the police, he shared what went on during the interview and wrote that the police took 14 posts on Facebook and his blog to question him. He noted that were posts completely unrelated to the by-election. He said that one was on the funding update for the defamation suit that he faced from PM Lee Hsien Loong and the other was on thoughts about how tax should be calculated in Singapore. He also poured out his thoughts after his ordeal and how this and other matters have affected his family.


The Elections Department (ELD) got no balls to even put the name of the Assistant Returning Officer.
Balless sissy fargots just like Gay Loong.
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Have to wait to see what (if any) they will be charged for.

It will be interesting to see what the Law Society has to say since its an issue of legal interpretation and one of its members is involved.

Will the opposition parties have anything to say-esp those MP's who are lawyers -not to mention about parliamentary immunity.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
I just wish Alex Au is back to his active self. His articles were incisive, accurate and hit the spot every time. The authorities hated it as he was right and they struggle to respond. Siew Kum Hong was also similar.

Not once did he address the issue.

Alex Au doesn't want to feel raped again. He's now a good boy. I should feed him a biscuit.
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Roy-Ngerng-Joel-Lazarus-interview-650x440.jpg


Roy Ngerng, a well-known political blogger who made news with his CPF articles and defamation suit with the Prime Minister of Singapore, was one of the two individuals who were called to assist the police in investigation of alleged violation of the Cooling Off Day regulations at the Cantonment Police Station, around 10am on Tuesday.

After a two hour interview with the police, instead of being allowed to go. Ngerng was escorted by three policemen back to his home and the police searched his residence without a search warrant. When the search was completed, the police took away 2 laptops, 2 harddisk, memory cards and his mobile phone.

Ngerng was brought back to the police station again for questioning before being released at around 6pm

On 27 May, the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) released a statement about the filing of police reports by the Assistant Returning Officer from the Elections Department (ELD) against socio-political site, The Independent Singapore (TISG), and two individuals, Teo Soh Lung and Roy Ngerng.

The unnamed Assistant Returning Officer filed the reports due to the publishing of "several online articles and postings that may be tantamount to election advertising, on Cooling-Off Day and Polling Day of the recent Bukit Batok by-election".

In a post that Ngerng made after his interview session with the police, he shared what went on during the interview and wrote that the police took 14 posts on Facebook and his blog to question him. He noted that were posts completely unrelated to the by-election. He said that one was on the funding update for the defamation suit that he faced from PM Lee Hsien Loong and the other was on thoughts about how tax should be calculated in Singapore. He also poured out his thoughts after his ordeal and how this and other matters have affected his family.

Below is Ngerng's full post on his Facebook account.

Got home only just. Spent nearly 8 hours being interrogated and held by the police today. Have not had a proper meal yet.

Was at the police station at 10am. Left close to 6pm.

Police took out 14 posts on Facebook and blog to question me.

But there were posts completely unrelated to the election. One was on the funding update for the defamation suit that I faced from the Singapore prime minister. Another was just thoughts about how tax should be calculated in Singapore.

The Election Department reported that I posted articles on the day before election - which to let my foreign friends know, is illegal in Singapore.

But personal views are allowed. Still, I am being investigated for posting my personal views.

The police told me a few times this is an arrestable crime and I could be arrested. I heard they threatened to arrest Soh Lung - the other lady being investigated with me.

When I thought I was done, several police officers surrounded me. I was to be brought home. They were going to "raid" my home, I was told.

My phone was taken away from me.

When I wanted to speak to Jeanette - the lawyer who was representing Soh Lung, they refused to let me. And dragged me away.

I insisted I wanted to know my rights and whether it was legal for them to do what they were doing. They would not let me speak to Jeanette.

My mom was at home when the police came. She was in shock. I have never seen my mom so traumatised before.

I do not remember how long the police were there. Two activist friends came to check on me. The police would not let them into my home.

When the police finished the raid and I had to head back to the police station, the police pulled me away before I could speak to my friends further more.

I was told that after I left, my mom broke down. My sister said my mom could not take it. She did not know how to handle things anymore. Mom has been trying too hard to put up a brave front for these 2 years since the government has been attacking me.

What can I do at that point? For being a useless and unfilial son?


Mom made me some oat to drink before I left again. When the policeman asked me what I ate, I told him it was a mother's love from her broken heart.

I told him - I stood up for justice and I lost my job. What did you lose?

It is very tiring. You fought so hard for equality. And who cares?

I spent nearly 8 hours with the police. I was not scared. Because my conscience is clear. But I kept thinking - why am I being investigated for a crime that I did not do - that should not even be a crime?

When I got back to the police station, the police told me that they wanted my all my passwords to access my phone, my laptop, and my Facebook and my WordPress accounts.

I asked why. They said it was because they wanted to check the IP address. They wanted to be sure I was the only person operating the account.

Funny, the government does not believe that just with one person, I can write nearly 700 articles on my blog and exposed how the government was taking our CPF pension funds to let GIC without telling Singaporeans?

I must be really honoured.

The police downloaded the archives from my Facebook. I overheard that Facebook taught them how to read the archives.

I asked them what they would do with my phone. They practically have access to my whole phone now and can access everything.

I have no more privacy.

I am angry. But tired. Exhausted. Sad. It is mixed emotions.

When I left the police station, I did not know what to feel.

I was reminded of what a PAP MP shared on his Facebook - democracy is like gang rape in action.

I felt raped. I felt raped when the police surrounded me to raid my home. I felt raped when they did not let me speak to my friends. I felt raped when the police searched all my devices and accounts in front of me. I felt like I was stripped and searched.

I lost my dignity, even as I tried hard to maintain it.

Having said that, most of the officers I met were nice enough. But one was not and was throwing his weight around. But I told the police - I do not hate them. They are doing their job. Singapore needs them for the real crimes. But it is in times like this, that I wonder if the police still remembers why they joined the police force for - to bully and intimidate or to protect people like me?

I have not eaten a proper meal until now. I told the police I wanted to get the interrogation over and done with quickly and did not want to eat. I did not know it would drag on for so long.

One policeman brought me two bars of cake. I thanked him but I did not eat them. He asked me why.

I said I do not trust this place. I do not trust what they would put in the food they give. They gave me two mineral water bottles. I did not dare to drink them. I did not trust the place, I said.

I told them - I have learnt not to trust because of what the PAP has done to me.

The police said - but we are nonpartisan.

Yeah, but the PAP makes use of you sometimes, I said. (PAP is the ruling party in government for the past 60 or so in Singapore, for those of you who do not know).

When I needed to go to the toilet about 5 or 6 times throughout the day, the police would stand watch over me like I am hardened criminal. They did this even when they raided my home. Imagine this - being guarded in your own home.

I stood my ground today but I did not know my rights, I did not know if what the police did was right or legal. I was pushed and pulled around.

I understand Soh Lung did not want to give her phone and laptop and asked for a search warrant. But the police threatened to arrest her.

Is this the kind of state we are in now - where we have to fear the very law and people who are supposed to protect us?

I am finally going to eat my first proper meal now. I am tired.

I wonder why I am doing all this. I am fighting for justice but it is tiring carrying the burden on my shoulders, alone.

When I stood my ground and faced the fire, I realise only I was there.

We want justice and equality for this country but we let just one person fight for it.

I asked the police - is your conscience pricked?

Is it?

I am sorry, mom and dad. I have let you down. I tried to be brave but what have I done to you? Have I done my duty to you as a son?

But it is not over yet. Tomorrow, I have to pay the prime minister the next installment for the defamation suit. I have to pay him S$180,000. And I still do not know if I will be charged for this "crime".

I told an activist who met me when I came out of the police station, that finally today has ended. He joked in a half-serious manner and said it has only just begun.

Perhaps, it has, the rot to our nation.

http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/201...thoughts-after-8-hour-ordeal-with-the-police/

If gang rape where is the semen stain?
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Alex Au doesn't want to feel raped again. He's now a good boy. I should feed him a biscuit.

no matter how "incisive, accurate and hit the spot" that gay fag is, a more than 69% super majority of sinkies cannot care less. it's part of the lunatic fringe that will end up in the trash heap of history. sinkies have predominantly conservative social values and the moment a gay arsehole chimes in, everybody except lgbt sympathizers cramps up and deploys chastity belts. he will not be taken seriously except by losers.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
no matter how "incisive, accurate and hit the spot" that gay fag is, a more than 69% super majority of sinkies cannot care less. it's part of the lunatic fringe that will end up in the trash heap of history. sinkies have predominantly conservative social values and the moment a gay arsehole chimes in, everybody except lgbt sympathizers cramps up and deploys chastity belts. he will not be taken seriously except by losers.

Sinkies are not conservative. They are pragmatic. They follow winners and money. Until PAP is losing, most sinkies won't join in. They will stand by the side and watch PAP kick your teeth in.

I hope Roy's mother gets a nervous breakdown. Roy still hasn't learnt his lesson yet. Neither has that Teo bitch. We should lock her up again.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sinkies are not conservative. They are pragmatic. They follow winners and money. Until PAP is losing, most sinkies won't join in. They will stand by the side and watch PAP kick your teeth in.

I hope Roy's mother gets a nervous breakdown. Roy still hasn't learnt his lesson yet. Neither has that Teo bitch. We should lock her up again.

you are correct that a large segment of the non-christian and non-muslim "conservative" voters are actually heartlanders with progressive acceptance. ah bengs, ah lians, ah sohs, ah pors, ah peks are telling me they support the pap as life in sg is comfortable and protected. even uncles who frequent ktvs, hfjs, and massage parlors are telling me they cannot afford to take on undue risks with the oppo's as pap is their best chance at continuing blissful lives of debauchery. and to my greatest surprise of all, old cardboard collectors and tissue sellers are telling me they are having a healthy lifestyle exercising and making money at the same time. win-win for these folks and the pap.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
you are correct that a large segment of the non-christian and non-muslim "conservative" voters are actually heartlanders with progressive acceptance. ah bengs, ah lians, ah sohs, ah pors, ah peks are telling me they support the pap as life in sg is comfortable and protected. even uncles who frequent ktvs, hfjs, and massage parlors are telling me they cannot afford to take on undue risks with the oppo's as pap is their best chance at continuing blissful lives of debauchery. and to my greatest surprise of all, old cardboard collectors and tissue sellers are telling me they are having a healthy lifestyle exercising and making money at the same time. win-win for these folks and the pap.

Sinkies have the best life under PAP. Even the ang mo want to move to Singapore to live and work.

I have professional associates who tell them they are fed up with the frequent strikes in western europe and how it has crippled their transport and left businesses and industries without fuel. While they know singapore's workers have their own difficulties, they marvel at how Singapore solves problems by discussion and tripartite partnership instead of just going on strikes for the sake for striking. Europe workers have been going on violet strikes yearly. So that tells you a lot about the state of their working environment.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sinkies have the best life under PAP. Even the ang mo want to move to Singapore to live and work.

I have professional associates who tell them they are fed up with the frequent strikes in western europe and how it has crippled their transport and left businesses and industries without fuel. While they know singapore's workers have their own difficulties, they marvel at how Singapore solves problems by discussion and tripartite partnership instead of just going on strikes for the sake for striking. Europe workers have been going on violet strikes yearly. So that tells you a lot about the state of their working environment.

tell me about it. we just ended a 7-week strike by giving union workers more than 10% pay raise over 4 years plus added benefits and more job openings for unionized labor. might as well sell the business as it's already losing money and a lost cause.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Playing the Martyr or the victim does not work. You have to attack the PAP on facts and there are many. Make it very clear that it was your personal view and the bloody law is so unclear that the Elections Dept had to come up with guidelines. This guidelines and the written piece of legislation have little correlation. Any sane person would take it as a personal view.

Pointless talking about not having your meal, your mother crying, your friends not allowed in the house, you cannot contact your lawyer, mentioning your foreign friends. These things are meant to milk the human emotions of the gullible. For heaven sake, they were with you from 10am to 6pm, that is not even a full day shift for many workers who have toil to make ends meet. Yet this has been spinned to near Mandela proportions.

Singapore, Malaysia and many other countries do not allow access to lawyers until the completion of investigation or until someone is released on bail. That has been the law from day one, nothing has changed. These statements only work for those who watch American TV shows and 1st world foreigners.

He needs to man up, be strong and firm. Not appear like a weak kuniang, pleading for mercy, and please don't ask for any further donations. Get a job.

When Alex Au was investigated, charged and convicted for taking on the judiciary, not ones did he talk about his father or mother, starving, people crying, not allowed to see the lawyer, having being raped and he never did ask for donations. This whole thing is embarrassing.

Damn the PAP and its agents like you.

Stop berating Roy. He has done more than anyone of us in trying to better the country. Roy is human and is entitled to express them.
 
Top