• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PSA Increase Docking Fee 10-Fold, Cruise Agents Up In Arms

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.lloydslist.com/ll/news/s...htm;.065acf6a61c52eed94766d1ba7da5d95d4ecd58a

Singapore cruise agents up in arms over extra charges

Marcus Hand, Singapore - Friday 9 October 2009

CRUISESHIP agents are in uproar over a decision by the Singapore Cruise Centre to charge ships an additional docking fee of 10 times the usual amount if they are forced to berth at container terminals due to congestion.

Singapore-based cruise line agents were informed officially a week ago of hefty new service charges to be levied in the October 2009 to April 2010 cruise season on vessels that will have to call at PSA’s container terminals due to lack of space during busy periods at the cruise centre.

The fee was not stated in the letter to agents informing them of the new charges, but agents who have enquired were told it would be an additional S$3,600 ($2,587) per hour, compared with S$340 per hour docking charges previously.

Singapore Shipping Association cruise sub-committee chairman Frankie Tan said they were concerned that both the service charge was very high, and it was being implemented immediately.

Mr Tan said it would affect the costs of cruise lines that had already published their programme for the next season and budgeted for their costs. International cruise lines normally plan their itineraries at least one year in advance.

The new higher fees will affect 19 ships scheduled to call at the Singapore Cruise Centre between now and April 2010. An average call of 12 hours for an affected vessel would cost an estimated average additional amount of S$41,392.

The Costa Classica, due to stay in port in Singapore for 34 hours, will pay an estimated additional S$107,644 on top of the original docking fee of $14,756. In total the 19 affected calls are expected to cost an additional S$789,399.

The cruise centre has given no reason as to why the additional fees are being levied and the SSA expressed grave concerns over the lack of consistency of transparency of fees being charged for vessels calling at third party berths.

“It would be a shame if a lack of transparency irreparably damages Singapore’s reputation and credibility after all the work that has gone into developing Singapore as an International Maritime Centre and cruise hub,” said SSA president SS Teo.

Mr Tan called for the fee to be postponed until at least next year to give cruise lines time to decide if they wanted to make alternative arrangements.

Cruise line agents said it was too early to gauge the reaction of cruise lines although they are expected to be unhappy about the charges and unwilling to accept such a large additional charge.

“Cruiseship operators may decide to divert their ships to other ports in the region in view of their lower costs,” said Mr Teo.

The Singapore Cruise Centre is the only licensed cruise terminal operator in the city state, and Maritime & Port Authority of Singapore does not allow cruiseships to anchor for passengers to be brought ashore by tenders.

Singapore’s second cruise terminal, which broke ground last week, will not be operational until the end of 2011. Cruiseship passenger arrivals in Singapore have grown by 20% this year and are expected to pass the 1m mark before year end.

================

For more updates, pls visit Singaporenewsalternative.blogspot.com

.
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Notice how one Papaya agency after another up fees and tariffs in defiance of the economic situation and with ridiculous %? Any more doubt that the Old Fart's and Ho Jinx's problem gambling habit has gotten worse, not better, after they were allowed to go away scott free and with no regret after their ming boggling $270B loss?
 

Sperminator

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.lloydslist.com/ll/news/s...htm;.065acf6a61c52eed94766d1ba7da5d95d4ecd58a

Singapore cruise agents up in arms over extra charges

Marcus Hand, Singapore - Friday 9 October 2009

CRUISESHIP agents are in uproar over a decision by the Singapore Cruise Centre to charge ships an additional docking fee of 10 times the usual amount if they are forced to berth at container terminals due to congestion.

Singapore-based cruise line agents were informed officially a week ago of hefty new service charges to be levied in the October 2009 to April 2010 cruise season on vessels that will have to call at PSA’s container terminals due to lack of space during busy periods at the cruise centre.

The fee was not stated in the letter to agents informing them of the new charges, but agents who have enquired were told it would be an additional S$3,600 ($2,587) per hour, compared with S$340 per hour docking charges previously.

Singapore Shipping Association cruise sub-committee chairman Frankie Tan said they were concerned that both the service charge was very high, and it was being implemented immediately.

Mr Tan said it would affect the costs of cruise lines that had already published their programme for the next season and budgeted for their costs. International cruise lines normally plan their itineraries at least one year in advance.

The new higher fees will affect 19 ships scheduled to call at the Singapore Cruise Centre between now and April 2010. An average call of 12 hours for an affected vessel would cost an estimated average additional amount of S$41,392.

The Costa Classica, due to stay in port in Singapore for 34 hours, will pay an estimated additional S$107,644 on top of the original docking fee of $14,756. In total the 19 affected calls are expected to cost an additional S$789,399.

The cruise centre has given no reason as to why the additional fees are being levied and the SSA expressed grave concerns over the lack of consistency of transparency of fees being charged for vessels calling at third party berths.

“It would be a shame if a lack of transparency irreparably damages Singapore’s reputation and credibility after all the work that has gone into developing Singapore as an International Maritime Centre and cruise hub,” said SSA president SS Teo.

Mr Tan called for the fee to be postponed until at least next year to give cruise lines time to decide if they wanted to make alternative arrangements.

Cruise line agents said it was too early to gauge the reaction of cruise lines although they are expected to be unhappy about the charges and unwilling to accept such a large additional charge.

“Cruiseship operators may decide to divert their ships to other ports in the region in view of their lower costs,” said Mr Teo.

The Singapore Cruise Centre is the only licensed cruise terminal operator in the city state, and Maritime & Port Authority of Singapore does not allow cruiseships to anchor for passengers to be brought ashore by tenders.

Singapore’s second cruise terminal, which broke ground last week, will not be operational until the end of 2011. Cruiseship passenger arrivals in Singapore have grown by 20% this year and are expected to pass the 1m mark before year end.

================

For more updates, pls visit Singaporenewsalternative.blogspot.com

.

Appalling.

Making such decisions by the Singapore Cruise Center raises some questions.

1. Could it be that they do not want too many Cruise Ships to be parked?

2. Or they are just greedy, forcing the planned schedule to pay for more?

I wonder who makes the pricing raise?

This would essentially be passed to the passengers, and meaning that Cruise fairs would increase... reducing the desire to take a cruise.

However, we know that usually in Cruise Ships there are Casinos.

And what we know that the International Resort are due for opening next year?

Could it be a business strategy of diverting the scarce gamblers into the IR instead of going to the Cruise Ships?

Most of the time, people going for Cruise is to enjoy the Casinos, and in a Casino, the chance of losing all your bets in one night is pretty high...

And someone rather have the Gamblers lose their gambling capital in the IR...

So these are just my speculation... any real reasons out there?
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PSA Increase Docking Fee 10-Fold, Cruise Agents Up In Arms ...
hdb increase rent ... lta increase erp ...

other ppl makin mor moni ... ofcos u oso want 2 make mor moni 2 show 2 ur boss ... nothin surprisin ...
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Notice how one Papaya agency after another up fees and tariffs in defiance of the economic situation and with ridiculous %? Any more doubt that the Old Fart's and Ho Jinx's problem gambling habit has gotten worse, not better, after they were allowed to go away scott free and with no regret after their ming boggling $270B loss?


It now costs $48 for a round trip to Batam. Previously it was only in the $20's but the price went up, up & up. The lame excuse for the price hike was baggage handling, security,.... fuel prices. Suspect that the added taxes was useed to pay for the upgrading of the mall :rolleyes:

The ferry tax on the Spore side is $21 :eek:

The gov't is taking a short term & dangerous game as it is discouraging visitors from Indonesian. The indonesian already have to pay the Indonesian a tariff for leaving Indonesia. Majority of Indos are not rich. Many Indos are instead going to Aust, Malaysai, LOS,.. Even the medical tourists are choosing to go elsewhere :rolleyes:
 

mercbenz

Alfrescian
Loyal
The day will come when we really need our reserves and when the vault opens up, there are cobwebs inside only.
 
Top