• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Mr Goh Meng Seng exploit people misery

Z

Zombie

Guest
If what you say can be be generally proven on balance, then I think MAS should probably intervene...

If what GMS said is correct, then everyone should sue MAS first.

Because MAS is the one to ensure that the disclosure documents (ie prospectus and pricing statements) to be adequate in providing all the informations required under the law, upon registration.
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
I don't think MAS can be sued, probably has statutory immunity. However adequate and appropriate political public pressure could probably 'force' MAS to do the "right thing" and facilitate an expeditious compensation payment to the victim/innocent investors without having to go down the lengthy, costly and uncertain legal route.

If what GMS said is correct, then everyone should sue MAS first.

Because MAS is the one to ensure that the disclosure documents (ie prospectus and pricing statements) to be adequate in providing all the informations required under the law, upon registration.
 
Top