-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Loyalty To Singapore
- Thread starter TracyTan866
- Start date
some values are universal despite globalisationa dn technological advancements.
love for country, love for families, care for the needy are universal values which anchor us .
if we have no love, we are just like any animal
Very true..
Singaporeans shd not allow a political party to jeopardise Singapore's identity
being loyal to SG is not dependent on pap's performance
good points!!!
loyalty and love are important in our lives
pap is singapore
pap is not Singapore
A country whose citizens are not loyal is heading for break-up
Good analysis and well said. Thanks
No one person, organisation or government, can claim that Singapore belongs to him.
Singapore belongs to Lee Kuan Yew you twit. Surely that's dawned on you after more than 40 years of PAP rule.
No, it doesn't. I'm tempted to call you twit too, but shall refrain from doing so less I drop to your level of name calling. Enjoy your weekend in Auckland (maybe go shack some sheeps?)
No, it doesn't. I'm tempted to call you twit too, but shall refrain from doing so less I drop to your level of name calling. Enjoy your weekend in Auckland (maybe go shack some sheeps?)
I agree with you. No Singaporean can claim that he is worth more than another Singaporean. We are all the same...Any Singaporean who thinks that LKY is worth more than him is truly worthless and useless.
In my morning jogs, I meet SR Nathan frequently when he was President. I dont mean to be rude...but I do ignore him even when I come face-to-face with him. If he smiles, I smile back...a Singaporean to another Singaporean. No more, no less.
I will do the same to LKY. Why shd he be more than me. In my eyes, LKY can be as big or as small as I allow him to be.
To some PAP running dogs, I may sound arrogant to ignore SR Nathan or LKY. But I know my position as a Singaporean. And I dont have to kowtow to LKY if I dont wish to
Last edited:
We all have our place in society. Whoever we are, we carry ourselves with pride and dignity, be pleasant and polite when we engage with people, be humble and compassionate.
LKY has done much for Singapore, I would respect him for that. If I see him in a park, I would smile and wave at him. But he's not God. I would not worship him and think that he can do no wrong. One day (won't be very long), he will become part of history and whether he leaves behind a legacy for future generations to remember, or curse, only time will tell. But great as the man is, Singapore does not belong to him. Or anyone for that matter.
Absolutely. We smile to one another because we are gracious and want to extend courtesy to others. We dont view that person as superior nor worth more
(maybe go shack some sheeps?)
The term is "shag" not "shack".
While LKY may not hold the title deeds to everything, the fact that he controls all pretty much makes him the de facto owner.
Yes Sir, it's shag. Maybe you go and shag some sheeps.
Yes I have fond memories of the places I grew up in but this cannot be translated to loyalty to the country aka PAP. Loyalty is an absolutely outdated thinking in this globalize village.
Last edited:
