some dogs are work dogs
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Anna
- Thread starter TracyTan866
- Start date
some dogs are work dogs
don't think so :o:o:o
erection2015
Alfrescian (InfP) + C
you are right brother. it will be a disaster to trust your wife to another man,esp when you wife is a hottie!!!
even if a woman trusts her best girl friend to her husband, it is also a big big mistake. she will eventually lose her husband too!
it works both ways. this is life.
Tell your good friend to look for Yaacob Ibrahim. He is a helpful minister and can assist in manpower related issues over and above his current portfolio.
A man can give you his heart, not his penis.
Guess its only 1 can of worm which is the CPF issues....but its not easy to get Dual Citizenship esp for western countries...
NS is probably not an issue...South Koreans are allowed dual citizenships if they have completed/ exempted from their Military services.....
I know Mark and May...a loving couple. Mark trusted his colleague and their good friend Ng. He asked Ng to help take care of May while he was on an overseas course. One thing led to another and Mark lost May
yes..i guess anyone who keeps a dog will pamper the dog. otherwise why keep it?
true...being together socially and having dinner is different from being closely and intimately together, esp when hormones are raging
Thanks for the advice. I hope YI is as helpful as you have described him.
But the issue here is not abt getting help. It goes down to a basic issue whether the pap can revoke a singaporean's citizenship or deny a singaporean her passport just because another country grants her a citizenship.
Isn't it a birthright of anyone borned in SG to be a SG citizen? can that be taken away by the govt? That's what Daphne has challenged MHA to decide.
Does a Singaporean have to sell her HDB flat just because she accepts another country's citizenship?
Is the pap abusing the SG Constitution
I am not sure I agree with what you said.
I wld think a man wld give a gal his p...s but not his heart
ICA does not have the right to ask her to renounce her Aussie ciizenship, doing so would cause more problems like a diplomatic row. ICA asked her to renounce her Singapore citizenship becos it's what the staff have been told to say & do, it's the law & the ICA staff are just following the rule book.
Can the pap deny anyone from taking up another country's citizenship by compelling her to renounce her SG citizenship?
Daphne has thrown the ball into MHA's court and told them that she is not renouncing her SG citizenship and niether is she selling her HDB flat. Let's see what MHA and HDB will do to her
Agree with you. ICA has no say over Daphne's choice to take up Australian citizenship
The pap has to think deeper into this issue. Is asking Daphne to renounce her SG citizenship constitutionally legal? Daphne suffers no fools
Scroobal's thread did mention ICA has the right to revoke SG citizenship (just saw it, by Scroobal himself).. too many pages to get the link :P
If ICA & HDB decides to play hardball... revoke citizenship and take back HDB flat (which is a 99 year lease from HDB, and not outright owned by the occupant of the flat)
That might result in a lot of unhappiness online though. Time for National Conversation
on dual citizenship..My guess is some idiot at ICA made the mistake the first time by renewing her passport when they should not have & when she renewed the second time, they just OK'd it without checking, the third time the mistake was spotted or maybe the counter staff were more on the ball & noticed she had filled in "Yes" to having dual citizenship. The ICA will now have to figure a way out for them as they should not have renewed her passport in the first & second time. No doubt this will be dealt with on an individual case basis & they are keen to keep it quiet.
Scroobal's thread did mention ICA has the right to revoke SG citizenship (just saw it, by Scroobal himself).. too many pages to get the link :P
If ICA & HDB decides to play hardball... revoke citizenship and take back HDB flat (which is a 99 year lease from HDB, and not outright owned by the occupant of the flat)
That might result in a lot of unhappiness online though. Time for National Conversation
Thanks...that's what MHA and HDB believe because they think the laws say so.
Do the laws contravene the Constitution?
Even if it is lawful for MHA and HDB to revoke a singaporean's citizenship, can the pap bear the political cost? will the pap sacrifice some singaporeans to keep many in line?
I dont think it is a straight forward case. It's a delicate issue...even if MHA and HDB are legally empowered to revoke citizenships, do they really want to stick with such outdated policies or would the pap seek to embrace Singaporeans who seek to be a global citizen?
Should the pap make a virtue out of necessity in this changing world rather than to stick to obsolete policies.
Similar threads
