Summer said:more likely a inside job.
maybe a Committee Of Inquiry
will be set up soon ???
The best source of pin codes of the cards is DBS's own video cameras installed at all ATMs. So is inside job likely?
Summer said:more likely a inside job.
maybe a Committee Of Inquiry
will be set up soon ???
a) full refund of stolen funds-how
can enough ?
b) lost of interest for the 1 week or so ?
c) and so on ...
a)
imagine ' A ' stole your car
and return it 5 days later to you.
you happy or not ?
one very ungrateful friend ...
dont like that said.
i did not vote last year hor.
just thinking if the 400 accounts
come from a foreign Bank , say CitiBank,
public reaction will be different right?
Your analogy is off the planet. DBS didn't steal anything. They had something stolen from them.
Here's a better analogy. You're looking after your friend's car while he's in reservist. It gets stolen while it's in your care. Your friend sees his car being driven around and calls you up to ask what the hell is going on.
Being a good friend, you take responsibility and buy him a replacement. He now wants to SUE YOU for allowing it to be stolen in the first place even though you've made good.
i worry when things are covered up :(
simple leh:
anything, ie "The Hard Truths", knowingly
concealed for whatever reasons = Cover-up , :(
Summer said:Yes. i think it is inside Job.
they want the CEO to Go
the way of SPH.
we will know soon .
The question is why would the fraudsters choose such a difficult site with the risk of being detected or discovered several times unless they have some special advantage in using these machines.
Leongsam said:The main advantage of skimming from ATMs in high traffic areas is the large number of accounts that can be harvested because of the volumes.
The disadvantage would be the risk of detection.
I've never heard of "inside jobs" skimming ATM machines. Insiders usually go for life changing multi million dollar deals by falsifying accounts or creating bogus overdraft facilities.
Your analogy is off the planet. DBS didn't steal anything. They had something stolen from them.
Here's a better analogy. You're looking after your friend's car while he's in reservist. It gets stolen while it's in your care. Your friend sees his car being driven around and calls you up to ask what the hell is going on.
Being a good friend, you take responsibility and buy him a replacement. He now wants to SUE YOU for allowing it to be stolen in the first place even though you've made good.