• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Zorro surfaces, accuses SMRT of being anti-union unlike SBS

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
SINGAPORE - Last week's illegal strike by SMRT's China bus drivers occurred because the public transport operator's management, the unions and the workers "did not work closely enough", labour chief Lim Swee Say said yesterday.

In his first comments on the illegal strike, which saw 171 workers protesting over salary increases and living conditions, the Secretary-General of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) said the labour dispute "shouldn't have happened" and "could have been avoided".

NTUC is thus reaching out to SMRT's management to persuade them "to adopt a more enlightened approach to embrace the union as a partner", he added.

Mr Lim, who was speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the Labour Movement Workplan Seminar, cited the example of SMRT's rival SBS Transit where nine in 10 of its China bus drivers are union members. Only one in 10 of SMRT's China bus drivers are union members, according to union sources.

SBS Transit's management "recognised the constructive role of the union", while union leaders "played the role of looking after the interests of the drivers", said Mr Lim.

"And as a result … they work very closely as one team, it's a win-win outcome. In terms of how workers are being treated and respected, how management are responsive, how they work together, I think it's a kind of model that we ought to see more and more in Singapore."

Mr Lim, who is also Minister in the Prime Minister's Office, said NTUC "is in closer contact" with SMRT's China drivers to "encourage them" to join the union. "Right or wrong, they have been given the impression that either there is no need to join the union, or (they have) no right to join the union," he added.

Mr Lim said the labour movement was "very encouraged" by an advisory on grievance-handling procedures issued by the Singapore National Employers Federation on Wednesday, but felt that there should be greater recognition of the role played by unions.

He said he hoped companies could accept unions as a partner "in a more positive way instead of resisting or limiting the role of unions".

NTUC, meanwhile, is currently "taking stock of the various ways" the labour movement can further strengthen their engagement of foreign workers who are union members here. NTUC currently represents 125,000 foreign workers - about 18 per cent of all members - who are spread across a variety of industries such as transport, food and beverage, and manufacturing.

TODAY
 
Last week's illegal strike by SMRT's China bus drivers occurred because the public transport operator's management, the unions and the workers "did not work closely enough"


I thought that's what a Labour chief job suppose to make sure they work closely enough ?!!!
 
lianbeng noted frogs always hide inside the well until safe to come out.:D grippit! grippit!
 
The union did nothing and now blames SMRT. SMRT CEO blames the former CEO. And the PRC workers? They can't blame anybody even though SMRT violated the contractual obligation and chose to ignore the complaints. Guess, they can blame the PAP government for passing an obtuse law.
 
End of day, the minister blame passengers for the low pay of drivers,.....profits, management salaries and bonus aside.

The solution : Passengers to pay more for fares!

Absolutely brilliant and a 'heal-all' solution! Win for ggovt, win for SMRT, win for everyone....except the poor end-users!

OK, sinkies, anymore complaints of any essential service? <You know how the problem will be solved!>
 
I thought that's what a Labour chief job suppose to make sure they work closely enough ?!!!

He's been very busy and very excited obsessed with his monthly CPF statements and payslips.His motive in life is staring at his monthly CPF statements and payslips which keeps him alive.Workers ? Work closely ? Where got time ? Regrettable ? LOL !
 
This stupid idiotic masked clown is not even aware that by his comments, he is just telling the whole world what a fcuked up job he has been doing.
When someone does not want to buy your product, it is his fault, by this guy's fuzzy logic.
 
All senior civil servants, including those in the uniform organizations, who leave before retirement age should lose their pension.
 
I thought that's what a Labour chief job suppose to make sure they work closely enough ?!!!


hi there


1. bro, no offence.
2. do you think that an ugly monkey that goes around donning some zorro outfit literally perform?
3. at its best, it would probably down 2 bananas at a time!
4. a very expensive ape act:mad:
 
This stupid idiotic masked clown is not even aware that by his comments, he is just telling the whole world what a fcuked up job he has been doing.
When someone does not want to buy your product, it is his fault, by this guy's fuzzy logic.


hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. the monkey-lookalike is farting via its rear again.
3. totally useless & damn fugly:D
 
He's been very busy and very excited obsessed with his monthly CPF statements and payslips.His motive in life is staring at his monthly CPF statements and payslips which keeps him alive.Workers ? Work closely ? Where got time ? Regrettable ? LOL !

[video=youtube;72zO-7Qfl-0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72zO-7Qfl-0[/video]
 
[video=youtube;72zO-7Qfl-0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72zO-7Qfl-0[/video]

LSS ex-deputy in NTUC Ong Ye Kung sit on the SMRT board and yet LSS accuses SMRT for non NTUC friendly????? What kind of logic is this??Also why did LSS speak now and not one or two years ago???
 
Back
Top